Beidou2020
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Dec 3, 2013
- Messages
- 7,857
- Reaction score
- -48
- Country
- Location
J-20S, J-35, KJ-600
All revealed within the last few days
All revealed within the last few days
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
J-20S, J-35, KJ-600
All revealed within the last few days
Don't forget about Y-20U Strategic Aerial Tanker last month
View attachment 788554
That's also mean, Type 003 Carrier Battle Group ready to take Action Fully Equipped
six inside,six outside.any news regarding its internal bay, howe many missiles or bombs it can carry?
That's indeed something worth of a brag!! Even if I've been "indulged" by the fast movement by China for its multiple defense programs, I still feel amazed to it! A big WOW!!J-20S, J-35, KJ-600
All revealed within the last few days
Yes it's about time, FC-31/35/whatever has been dragging on for years, with 003 in shape, J-15 even KJ-600 both ready, this perhaps is last piece of the puzzle. I believe it has always been designed for CV since 1st day on drawing board, i.e. everything from aspect ratio to low speed maneuverability to EW suite (similar to F-35's role in NIIF-CA) revolves around CV and naval doctrine. The previous "prototypes" are more like testbeds at different stages, it has never been a land-based design, but of course future land-based variants (export-driven, PLAAF unlikely) are not ruled out.It's to be expected naval stealth fighter would appear around this time. Could you imagine Type 003 was finished and there was nothing on it but J-15? That would b a disaster!
any news regarding its internal bay, howe many missiles or bombs it can carry?
Yes it's about time, FC-31/35/whatever has been dragging on for years, with 003 in shape, J-15 even KJ-600 both ready, this perhaps is last piece of the puzzle. I believe it has always been designed for CV since 1st day on drawing board, i.e. everything from aspect ratio to low speed maneuverability to EW suite (similar to F-35's role in NIIF-CA) revolves around CV and naval doctrine. The previous "prototypes" are more like testbeds at different stages, it has never been a land-based design, but of course future land-based variants (export-driven, PLAAF unlikely) are not ruled out.
Also a “J-15D” could be developed to function as a growler, similar to the J-16D.J-15 may be demoted to bomb trucks while this beauty dominates the air.
Yes I also think some roles will be undertaken by UAV, like recon, ASW or tanker like you have mentioned. That's one distinctive benefit brought by EMALS i.e. flexibility to catapult a wide range of take-off-weights, a capability that STOBARs (CV-16, 17) does not offer. PLAAF is obviosuly far ahead in fielding UAVs, how PLAN max out of the new platform is yet to be seen.The carrier lacks a dedicated fixed wing ASW asset like the S-3 Viking. Perhaps that role will be filled with a drone that could also be the basis for a tanker like the MQ-25.
Exactly, that's why I think one design criteria of J-XY must be ability to play similar role as F-35 plays in NIIF-CA, cos PLAN might have developed similar doctrine. J-15D is a necessary piece of the picture.Also a “J-15D” could be developed to function as a growler, similar to the J-16D.