batmannow
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Jan 28, 2008
- Messages
- 18,830
- Reaction score
- -19
- Country
- Location
we ill contact you , sooon when the noora govt is finished?what is this?
1. its not as easy as it looks. homeless (of kachi basits) have been given homes/land many times but instead they sell those homes and continue to live where they live for various benefits.
2. fair enough.
3. Average wage earning per month was 10,000 rupees in 2011 according to ILO global wage database. ILO global wage report (2012-13) says that more than 50% of employees (those getting monthly salary) in Pakistan were poor. according to the same report, around 57% of wage earners were living under 2$ a day (as per 2005 data). So this means that on average 1 out of two employed people will be paying 'half the real amount on flour, rice, milk, cooking oil, sugar, and plain clothes.' this is totally absurd.
4. look at point 3. on average half of the Pakistan is lower middle class. meaning almost half of pakistan will be paying 'half of the exact amount of these utilities.' Again, this is absurd.
5. fair enough.
6. fair enough.
7. fair enough.
8. What are peace centres and why do we need to teach 'peace' to people via training centres? i fail to conceive the idea of training centres for peace. establishing and running 10,000 'peace training centres' is a waste of resources. and why will the religious seminaries revise their syllabus on your call?
9. law have been amended. Its a matter of implementing them and developing a culture which does not harass women. Anyway, Dr. Tahir ul-Qadri sbs role has been constructive through out when it comes to respecting women. Deserves the appreciation.
10. I dont agree that the disparity should be minimized. Poor should be supported via social spending and targeted subsidies rather than cutting/restricting the income of high skilled work force. Income disparity is too less in the govt institutions. a lower scale person in the govt institution earns more than his/her private sector contemporary while a high scale person earns less than his/her private sector contemporary.
there is hardly any economic consideration in these policy statements. huge amount of subsidies are mentioned which can no way be sustained. Either the person who made this picture was mistaken to only show these populist policies or otherwise PAT doesnt know what they are saying.
till then just keep a cool head?lolzz