Critics of the policy say "Daesh" is a politically correct linguistic device that allows Western leaders to claim that the Islamic State is not Islamic -- and thus ignore the root cause of Islamic terror and militant jihad.
I just caught that in the long drawn out compendium of untruths from your post #8.
It's ridiculous and only understandable under the penmanship of a biased author.
Daesh is the insulting ( to the ISIL ) nickname of these killers so not politically correct by any stretch of imagination.
What's more, the root cause mentioned is in fact murderous hatred, not Islam.
Of course, it does fit the following point to a T :
French leaders have also been consistently antagonistic toward Israel, a country facing Islamic terror on a daily basis. France is leading international diplomatic efforts to push for a UN resolution that would lead to the establishment of an independent Palestinian state within a period of two years. The move effectively whitewashes Palestinian terror.
Are you sure the pro-Palestinian stance of France is not the reason for this ludicrous piece and your own viewpoint?
Seriously, if anything whitewashes Palestinian terror, couldn't it be the Israeli ( govt ) treatment of that people?
As for your conclusion on foreigners imagining a quota system :
terrorizing non-Muslims becomes accepted by the larger society? Your civil rights are gone; you exist only by the will of others.
it's pure unadulterated drivel.
As a non-Jew, I'll take civil rights in France over those in Israel any day!
I'm as sad for your opinion as I am glad it's not true, sorry to say, Tay.
P.S. If your friends are serious about foregoing visits to France hence, could they please
… convince Benjamin to do the same?