Panama leak Case Proceedings - JIT Report, News, Updates And Discussion

[Tameem]

NS name is not in panama leaks.... and pti has provided 0 proof of maryam being his dependant (news paper cuttings excluding)...

I dont know why my pti colleagues are so anxiously awaiting decision...

They will have an enormous task of damage control after decision if ik has to survive in politics... especially after his shenanigans of last week... phateecher and every thing...

Exactly, I mean, If one just hypothetically assume that court reached a decision against NS, then they should call him in person in court to give him one last chance to defend (just like in case of YRG). It will be totally against the justice to gave verdict on assumption and without calling person to defend.

The point is, court states that 99% documents are garbage, they never calls premier in court and here PTI Kids thinks verdict will be against NS.....highly childish and immature.

 

[Baghial]

Nabeel Gabol lol. Yea, totally credible fella he is.

jee VERY CREDIABLE,,,,,,,,,,, 5/6 PARTIES GHOOM PHAR KAR PIR SEE APNA ROOHANI BAAP KE PAAS JA BETHA.

 

[PakSword]

Nabil Gabol‏ @Nabilgabol
Panama case Verdict expected next week . MNS wil announce early elections b4 the verdict and resign .

Aur kisi ko lagta hai ke Nawaz Sharif verdict se pehle resign karsakta hai? Mujhe tu aisa nahi lagta

@Verve @PakSword @Arsalan

Nabil Gabol aaj kal PPPP main hai.. PPPP aur uss ke log aaj kal bilkul hi out hain.. koi inn ko important nahi samajhta.. establishment inn ko shak ki nazar se dekhti hai,.. yeh log attention seekers hain, iss se ziada kuchh nahi..

 

[Mrc]

Exactly, I mean, If one just hypothetically assume that court reached a decision against NS, then they should call him in person in court to give him one last chance to defend (just like in case of YRG). It will be totally against the justice to gave verdict on assumption and without calling person to defend.

The point is, court states that 99% documents are garbage, they never calls premier in court and here PTI Kids thinks verdict will be against NS.....highly childish and immature.

Both side had no evidence to present...

By law burden of proof is on accuser..

Even if court makes an exception on this... even than there is question of how NS is can be linked to this...

PTI lawyers are presuming (no evidence) that NS bought property in his childern name.... ok.... NS lawyer argued that money was given not by father but grandfather (mian sharif) ... again no proof... but in abscence of any solid evidence either way... NS lawyer has created a reasonable doubt...

Without evidence even if there is 1% chance that grandfather was responsible for transaction.... that doubt is reasonable...and goes in favour of accused.... verdict shoukd be not guilty....in my opinion...

I dont see any mitigation to that... just fanboy dreams and alot of abuse

 

[PakSword]

By law burden of proof is on accuser..

Do you know the law more than SC?

 

[Mrc]

Do you know the law more than SC?

This is a universal rule of law... every one knowz this much

 

[PakSword]

Even if court makes an exception on this... even than there is question of how NS is can be linked to this...

Because:

His children own expensive properties for which they couldn't provide any source of income other than a Qatari khat. They were even asked to provide the source of 52 crore, they didn't disclose, on which SC remarked that the money seemed to be circulating..

This is a universal rule of law... every one knowz this much

No.. you are wrong.. By the way, what is the universal law?

NS lawyer has created a reasonable doubt...

You are right here.. A commission is required.. but before than the "regulator" of NAB should be suspended.

 

[Mrc]

No.. you are wrong.. By the way, what is the universal law?

Meaning every country in world has same principle. Burden of proof is on accuser

 

[PakSword]

Without evidence even if there is 1% chance that grandfather was responsible for transaction.... that doubt is reasonable...and goes in favour of accused.... verdict shoukd be not guilty....in my opinion...

If this is the case, every corrupt person will bring a letter saying that his "deceased" grand father had friend who is also "deceased" and the money came from either of them... clean chit to everyone yeeaaa!

Meaning every country in world has same principle. Burden of proof is on accuser

I am asking this question one last time.. Have you read laws related to money laundering and corruption?

Have you read NAB ordinance on this?

 

[Mrc]

If this is the case, every corrupt person will bring a letter saying that his "deceased" grand father had friend who is also "deceased" and the money came from either of them... clean chit to everyone yeeaaa!

If u are accused of murder... police have to prove u are a nurderer ... not other way around.... please google and read burden of proof if u dont know it.. reversing that would result in syria or nazi germany lije situation...

Case is in supreme court not in NAB ... whatever that ordinance says is irrelevant here...

First link NS to properties... with evidence....not done... not guilty...

 

[PakSword]

If u are accused of murder... police have to prove u are a nurderer ... not other way around.... please google and read burden of proof if u dont know it.. reversing that would result in syria or nazi germany lije situation...

Case is in supreme court not in NAB ... whatever that ordinance says is irrelevant here...

First link NS to properties... with evidence....not done... not guilty...

Again asking, have you read the law on money laundering and corruption? I am not talking about murder.. Can I help you?

 

[Mrc]

Again asking, have you read the law on money laundering and corruption? I am not talking about murder.. Can I help you?

No and please share a link

 

[PakSword]

@Mrc while I search the link for you, just look at the following three pictures and read the tickers..

 

[Farah Sohail]

Ye PML N supporters aaj achanak se kahan se aagaye......is thread main? Abhi 23rd tu door hain... Abhi kuch din hain verdict aanay main.... Abhi relax karein

 

[Mrc]

@Mrc while I search the link for you, just look at the following three pictures and read the tickers..

View attachment 384152 View attachment 384153 View attachment 384154

To be honest i will like justice to pervail here...

I dont know much about NAB law... but if burden of proof is reversed in that law...
Its absolutely pathetic than the performance of NAB.. which is like punjab thanedar ....pathetic

Ye PML N supporters aaj achanak se kahan se aagaye......is thread main? Abhi 23rd tu door hain... Abhi kuch din hain verdict aanay main.... Abhi relax karein

Verdict will come before 23rd march... my prediction..
President can preside the parade and i dont think supreme court gives a damn....unless army soecifically requests a delay... which i dont think they will...