So on what constitutional article will the ruling for "conflict of interest" be?Obviously the judgement has to be based on 63(1)(1), for it was the article which was invoked
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So on what constitutional article will the ruling for "conflict of interest" be?Obviously the judgement has to be based on 63(1)(1), for it was the article which was invoked
It says who ceases to be a Pakistani it doesn't say about dual national, a dual national is still a Pakistani.
Want to read a long judgement of Justice Chaudhry?
Yes! JIT was provided with all the record, same is true for PTI.
Sheikh rashid argued...ke phir tu PM ko agar koi enemy agency hire kar ley..phir?
That, as Prime Minister of Pakistan, I will discharge my duties, and perform my functions, hon-estly, to the best of my ability, faithfully in accordance with the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan and the law, and always in the interest of the sovereignty, integrity, solidarity, well- being and prosperity of Pakistan:
Just heard Sh. Rasheed.Sheikh rashid argued...ke phir tu PM ko agar koi enemy agency hire kar ley..phir?
JApart from that... lahore m banners lagy hn " mian saab jany do shehbaz sharif ko any do " is it true ?
If it is then from whome ?
Is there a clear rift in noora league ?
So this is true then ?maybe by Hamza Shahbaz ... he wasn't so happy about Maryam getting all the attention ... obviously with Shahbaz's consent
Just heard Sh. Rasheed.
He is in the view that nothing is going to change regarding the evidence which they are claiming now.
Case is closed and no new evidence can be considerd now.
Apart from that... lahore m banners lagy hn " mian saab jany do shehbaz sharif ko any do " is it true ?
If it is then from whome ?
Is there a clear rift in noora league ?
So this is true then ?
Mera nahi khyal ke NS ke bach janay ka koi chance hai... Undeclared bank accounts, conflict of interest on dubai job..qatari letter, jhoot....no money trial..forged docs..maryam beneficial pwner proved...what else is reqd for disqualification?
Now..has it been proved tht these docs whivh are now shown on media..were they submitted to SC, and JIT, before or not? @Emmie
Aur doosri baat ye ke PML N jo ab dey rahi hai..aguments/docs ..ye pehle kiun nahi diye..jab Kh Haris arguments de rahay thay? Why on last day? SC hasnt even accepted and made these docs, part of record..agar ye wohi hain, jo Kh Haris end main laaye thay?
Ye docs waisa hi twist tu nahi jo 2 days pehle Hussain nawaz ke docs thay ke game changer hain...aur SC ne aisi taisi kar di thee..un docs ki?
So the "new evidence " is also destined for " raddi ki tokri " ?
Abhi 92 report kar raha tha ke SC has accepted these docs..
It means my friend was right when he said it would be difficult for SC being the very last forum to not accept anything from defense.