What's new

Panama leak Case Proceedings - JIT Report, News, Updates And Discussion

Status
Not open for further replies.
I am hearing that Shahbaaz (he's more clever than dumb Nawazu) has made a plan to directly make judges controversial---by doing something along the lines of submitting a huge amount of cash to judges' family members account and then 'exposing' the transaction as bribe etc (all before the judges or their families could even realize what happened).

Shareefs have their trusted partners/moles in banking institutions and all others.

So SC has to move quickly and decisively.

Allah khair karay
 
. .
Is article main..itself mentioned nahi hai? Ke 62-1(f) main kitnay arsay ke liye disqualification hai? Because Justice Khosa and Gulzar just mentioned he is dusqualified acc to 62-1 (f) .. They didnt mention any time frame....

There's no specified time period mentioned in 62, ROPA is followed.
 
.
I am hearing that Shahbaaz (he's more clever than dumb Nawazu) has made a plan to directly make judges controversial---by doing something along the lines of submitting a huge amount of cash to judges' family members account and then 'exposing' the transaction as bribe etc (all before the judges or their families could even realize what happened).

Shareefs have their trusted partners/moles in banking institutions and all others.

So SC has to move quickly and decisively.

Allah khair karay

Can't do anything like that.. It is very difficult nowadays..
 
. .
I am hearing that Shahbaaz (he's more clever than dumb Nawazu) has made a plan to directly make judges controversial---by doing something along the lines of submitting a huge amount of cash to judges' family members account and then 'exposing' the transaction as bribe etc (all before the judges or their families could even realize what happened).

Shareefs have their trusted partners/moles in banking institutions and all others.

So SC has to move quickly and decisively.

Allah khair karay
Well considering you've already heard this ingenious plan it means the plan wasn't that good to begin with if everyone knows now lol.
 
.
Aaj ek argument jo mujhe rebuttals main missing laga.. Rebuttals main inhon ne sirf disqualification ke arguments diye...forgery ke cases ka kisi ne nahi kaha..ke forgery ke cases bhi banayein...? Kiun?

Initial application main covered nahi tha.. Forgery will be addressed by the court only.. Agar woh forgery ke upar argument detey tou unhain rok dia jata..


Yeh aurat confirm ro rahi thi.. I am telling you..
 
. . .
Hahahah! dukhtar-e-awal is too cruel.

this statement :D

Screenshot_2017-07-21-13-26-00.png
 
. .
minimum 5 maximum 21.

Why didnt Justice Khosa and Gulzar then mention time frame ...ke woh kitnay years ke liye disqualify karrahay hain? Unhon ne 62-1(f) aur section 99 of ROPA ka zikr kiya tha sirf.. I thought ke inn articles main itself time frame mentioned hoga.....?
 
Last edited:
.
Why didnt Justice Khosa and Gulzar then mention time frame mention ...ke woh kitnay years ke liye disqualify karrahay hain? Unhon ne 62-1(f) aur section 99 of ROPA ka zikr kiya tha sirf.. I thought ke inn articles main itself time frame mentioned hoga.....?

I think complete judgement nahi tha iss liey.. abb aayega complete judgment..

@Farah Sohail

A good read.. I am also readind it..

https://sahsol.lums.edu.pk/sites/default/files/article_3-_distilling_eligibility_and_virtue.pdf
 
. . .
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom