Pakistan's U-turn on talks with India, says PM Modi's letter doesn't mention offer for dialogue

[VILAYATI]

"India is looking for constructive and meaningful engagement with Pakistan," the PM said in the letter written on August 18.''


https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com...pak-foreign-minister/articleshow/65470265.cms

too busy raping women and children so its clouding their judgement.

Nonsense .

 

[Windjammer]

Where is the U turn? when Pakistan is itself saying that it never said something like that? The government of Pakistan is not responsible for whatever spin media tries to do.

Poor creatures victims of their own propaganda machinery.
And PDF has given them a voice.

 

[El Sidd]

Poor creatures victims of their own propaganda machinery.
And PDF has given them a voice.

They are not poor
Ask karna

 

[randomradio]

The Pakistanis are fooling themselves if they believe talks are possible.

 

[randomradio]

Even Qureshi has now threatened India with the atum bum.

https://www.indiatoday.in/india/sto...istan-talks-says-islamabad-1318879-2018-08-20
"I want to tell India that there is no space for adventurism. We are not only your neighbour but also an atomic power," Qureshi said.

 

[Windjammer]

They are not poor
Ask karna

Well you can't ignore Jairam Ramesh either.

 

[BHarwana]

It is the last year election are coming and message of peace from Pakistan is not good for politics of Modi he will lose his hate votes in India.

 

[randomradio]

It is the last year election are coming and message of peace from Pakistan is not good for politics of Modi he will lose his hate votes in India.

You obviously don't, and pretty much all the Pakistanis here also don't get it, but your civilian leadership has little to no part to play with Pakistan's foreign policy.

All the major foreign policy decisions are made by some other people. So your message of peace only falls on deaf ears.

 

[SabzShaheen]

even if this were true, is it something news worthy or something to be proud of that india did and has not offered dialogue? on one hand india wants kashmir to remain a bilateral issue (even though they hypocritically try to involve third parties from time to time) but won't engage in dialogue. it's as if they don't want to resolve the kashmir issue

 

[randomradio]

even if this were true, is it something news worthy or something to be proud of that india did and has not offered dialogue? on one hand india wants kashmir to remain a bilateral issue (even though they hypocritically try to involve third parties from time to time) but won't engage in dialogue. it's as if they don't want to resolve the kashmir issue

We drew a line long ago. We are willing to talk, but only after terrorism stops. Until terrorism stops, there is no scope for dialogue at all.

And no, you got something mixed up. We are vehemently opposed to third party interference. We have in fact made it clear to other countries that interference in bilateral issues by third countries will lead to a severe downgrade of diplomatic relations with that country. That's why no one has even bothered to interfere. It is Pakistan that tries to bring in a third party.

 

[Windjammer]

For Indians on PDF, that's a matter of pride.

And i'm sure they are thrilled when dressed in pink saree and no shame in the desperation of getting back.

 

[SabzShaheen]

We drew a line long ago. We are willing to talk, but only after terrorism stops. Until terrorism stops, there is no scope for dialogue at all.

And no, you got something mixed up. We are vehemently opposed to third party interference. We have in fact made it clear to other countries that interference in bilateral issues by third countries will lead to a severe downgrade of diplomatic relations with that country. That's why no one has even bothered to interfere. It is Pakistan that tries to bring in a third party.

i've said this before and i will say it again, the indian point of view is contradictory. indians say that it is the pakistani army running the foreign affairs of the country and sponsoring terrorism. if we are to assume it is true, then don't you think it would make sense for india, if they truly want peace and stability, to engage in dialogue despite terrorist attacks? i've seen it argued in indian media that the pakistani army sponsors these terrorist attacks just when the two nations are reaching the point for dialogue in order to prevent peace so they stay in power in pakistan. if this were true then india could get around this by just continuing dialogue with pakistani politicians and even army folk. then the pakistani army would lose it's current influence in pakistani social and foreign affairs because the whole reason it has it is because of the perceived threat from our neighbours, mainly india.

i dont have any sources right now about india bringing in third parties so i'll leave that. terrorism has to stop for sure, but general bajwa has made it clear that he is pro-peace and anti terror. however, india must concede that cross-border skirmishes will continue to occur and lives on both sides will be lost before any dialogue is finished.

 

[Sugarcane]

Although Urdu originated in Hindustan but looks like there's nobody in Hindustan who can understand it or Modi ji wet his chaddi considering the backlash of 90% idiots when they will find out that their macho man is offering dialogues to dushman desh and asked the spin factory to spin it to massage the ultra micro egos of Hindustanis

 

[Hamza913]

Even Qureshi has now threatened India with the atum bum.

https://www.indiatoday.in/india/sto...istan-talks-says-islamabad-1318879-2018-08-20
"I want to tell India that there is no space for adventurism. We are not only your neighbour but also an atomic power," Qureshi said.

It keeps the barbarians at the gates.

 

[Sully3]

Even Qureshi has now threatened India with the atum bum.

https://www.indiatoday.in/india/sto...istan-talks-says-islamabad-1318879-2018-08-20
"I want to tell India that there is no space for adventurism. We are not only your neighbour but also an atomic power," Qureshi said.

lol you temple educated and feed imbecile

he isnt threatening, he infact is saying war would be suicidal for both countries.