What's new

PAKISTAN’S RESPONSE TO ANNOUNCEMENT BY THE KINGDOM OF SAUDI ARABIA REGARDING AN ALLIANCE

Saudi apologists and the Indians are eagerly waiting for Pakistan to make another huge mistake by joining the Middle East conflict. Then the Indian supported terrorist groups will start attacking Pakistan's strategic, military and nuclear installations while claiming loyalty to ISIS, Al Qaeeda, Talibans, etc. Pakistan is NOT going to join the Middle East conflict.
Well dude those groups are already trying their best to harm us, joining this alliance won't change much.

BTW I have no problem joining this Alliance of mighty Muslim states like Djibouti and Comoros, but only if KSA agrees to share 25 percent of its annual defense budget with us, they are spending 80 Billion USD a year on defense, just imagine all the goodies we can get with an additional 20 Billion USD per year. :pleasantry:

But if all they are willing to do is provide a couple of billion dollars as aid, then f*** this, ISIS is not a threat to us. And even if it becomes one, it will be wise to deal it with the help of Afghanistan and other neighbors than let's say Senegal.
 
.
These groups are defaming islam...
Creating fitna in name of islam...
Muslims should eliminate them ...or give way to non muslim powers that are attacked to eliminate them...first option being preferable

Thats islamic law...

We punish criminals not protect them...
 
.
we can get with an additional 20 Billion USD per year.

We got nearly $10 billion for support in Afghanistan but lost $100 billion when economy stagnated due to this war. Beside the Saudi gave $30 billion to Egypt and we are more than three times bigger than Egypt and have more experienced army. They should have offered us $100 billion which would have repaid our total foreign debt.
 
.
Pakistani military is stretched out already on the eastern and the Western borders. There is a shortage of officers so 4th battalion in PMA has been comissioned to increase intake. PA forces fighting terrorists are on a very tough schedule esp SSG. All air assets like transport and ATTACK helicopters are being deployed for use against TTP.
In all honesty, PA cannot spare forces to be sent abroad for direct action. Maybe send instructors and advisors to oversee training and ops.
 
.
We got nearly $10 billion for support in Afghanistan but lost $100 billion when economy stagnated due to this war. Besided Saudi gave $30 billion to Egypt and we are more than three times bigger than Egypt and have more experienced army. They should have offered us $100 billion which would have paid our total foreign debt.
For that my friend first we will have to find a regime that is friendly to Iran and talks against the Arab monarchies. Once that is in power our army will have to topple it with the blessings of KSA and become friendly to KSA again, once that is done Riyals will rain on us.
 
.
I also don't understand why KSA is interested in leading the coalition. Generals like Eisenhower are needed to lead a multinational military ops against a hidden enemy. Eisenhower led probably fewer nations than 34 in WW2, how does KSA think it has the military expertise to lead armies of 34 nations?
Which muslim country has the best generals ? Vast experience of wars ? Best trained soldiers ? Which muslim country is most vulnerable to face terrorist retaliation in case of such ops ? Who is going to fund these ops ? What compensation will that country get which loses the most soldiers or assets during ops?
 
.
Pakistan created, trained and equipped Talibans that is a historical fact.

Some points for you to pounder but I am damn sure you will repeat your bias & hypocrite attitude towards Pakistan & its Institutions ....

- The mujahedin benefited from U.S. weapons, provided through the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) in cooperation with Pakistan’s Inter-Service Intelligence directorate (ISI).

- The State Department has said that a total of about $3 billion in economic and covert military assistance was provided by the United States to the Afghan mujahedin from 1980 until the end of the Soviet occupation in 1989.

- U.S. Assistance to Afghanistan During the 1990s, the United States was the largest single provider of assistance to the Afghan people even though no U.S. aid went directly to the Taliban government when it was in power during 1996-2001; monies were provided through relief organizations.

- The Taliban’s leader, Mullah Muhammad Umar, had been a fighter in Khalis’s Hezb-i-Islam party during the anti-Soviet war—Khalis’ party

- The Clinton Administration opened talks with the Taliban after it captured Qandahar in 1994 and continued to engage the movement after it took power

- Between 1985 and 1994, the United States had a cross-border aid program for Afghanistan, implemented by USAID personnel based in Pakistan.

- Even though the Northern Alliance was supplied with Iranian, Russian, and Indian financial and military support

- Iran, perhaps attempting to demonstrate that it can cause U.S. combat deaths in Afghanistan

- Recent State Department reports on international terrorism have stated that the Qods Force of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps of Iran (IRGC-QF) provides training to the Taliban on small unit tactics, small arms, explosives, and indirect weapons fire, and that it has shipped arms to militants in Qandahar.

- This phrasing implies that Iran is arming Pashtun Taliban militants in the core of the combat zone in Afghanistan. Weapons provided reportedly include mortars, 107mm rockets, rocket-propelled grenades, and plastic explosives.

- In March 2011, NATO said it had seized 48 Iranian-made rockets in Nimruz Province, bound for Afghan militants; the 122mm rockets have a range (13 miles) greater than those previously provided by Iran.

- On August 3, 2010, the Treasury Department, acting under Executive Order 13224, named two IRGC-QF officers as terrorism supporting entities, freezing any U.S.-based assets.

- Iran reportedly has allowed a Taliban office to open in Iran, and high-level Taliban figures have visited Iran.

https://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/row/RL30588.pdf
 
Last edited:
.
This politely says that Pakistan is not part of this alliance.

Please stop interpreting things as per your desires. Learn to differentiate whims and wishes with from concrete facts and accept what has already taken place.
Peace.
 
.
PR No. 164
PRESS RELEASE
PAKISTAN’S RESPONSE TO ANNOUNCEMENT BY THE KINGDOM OF SAUDI ARABIA REGARDING
FORMATION OF AN ALLIANCE AGAINST TERRORISM

Islamabad: December 16, 2015

As is well known, Pakistan has consistently supported all regional and international efforts to combat militancy, extremism and terrorism and, to this end, has extended its full support and cooperation to international community.

This becomes very contentious especially while terrorists finding heavenly ambience in green land....
Allegations of support system in Pakistan for Osama bin Laden - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The return of Masood Azhar - Pakistan - DAWN.COM

Lastly not to mention about Good terrorists......
 
.
What expertise ? First creating, training and equipping the Talibans then hunting and killing them. Pakistan Army created its own nemesis and some elements still support Talibans.

I gotta admit I had a lol moment here, alas your objective way of looking at our reigion and its problems will have very little audience as we are blinded by false brovado and sense of false image :(

I hope that that it will have more takers in the years to come but countless innocent folks will have paid the ultimate price by then, the Peshawar massacre is one good example of such episode.

/Peace
 
.
Great - so the state that spawned ISIS will lead the coalition to fight it? What a joke! The Saudis can begin by not funding ISIS and other affiliated jihadist groups. That would be a good start.
 
Last edited:
.
Pakistan should NOT by any means should be part of this alliance. Let them deal with their own mess & Pakistan should stay away from it.
 
.

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom