Pakistan's 'Nuclear Bluff Exposed', Indian Minister Warns

[tore]

that means india pakistan is now closer to nuclear war

 

[Longhorn]

I think they might grow a few extra toes not brain cells.

They need to grow some balls

 

[khanmubashir]

Only bluff that's been exposed is of India s overwhelming conventional superiority
Pakistan has shown it has enough conventional capabilities to punish any Indian misadventures and make em back off


The world has seen this in broad daylight

Now only thing modi gov can do is do Rundi Rona and fool bhakts and since India is the most ignorant in world Google so it's the only place where such BS can work ;

 

[alee92nawaz]

Salaam!

© AP Photo/ Anjum Naveed
Pakistan's 'Nuclear Bluff Exposed', Indian Minister Warns

https://sputniknews.com/asia/201903101073100538-pakistan-nuclear-bluff-exposed-india/
13:17 10.03.2019(updated 13:19 10.03.2019)
Conflict Between India, Pakistan Escalates Over Exchange of Airstrikes in Kashmir
The statement comes weeks after India accused Pakistan of harbouring terrorists and having a “direct hand” in the deadly suicide bomb attack on the Indian paramilitary police force in Kashmir in mid-February. Islamabad, for its part, has vehemently denied the allegations and arrested over 40 terrorists earlier this week.

New Delhi has “exposed” Pakistan’s “nuclear bluff” by carrying out an air raid on an alleged Jaish-e Mohammad terror camp at Balakot in Pakistan-administered Kashmir on 26 February, Indian Finance Minister Arun Jaitley said on Saturday.

“India fought and won conventional wars against Pakistan in 1965, 1971 and during the Kargil conflict. Since then, Pakistan’s army has realised that because of our huge economy and superior military strength, conventional wars cannot be won. Since both countries are armed with nuclear weapons, the nuclear bluff was their second option. But it has been exposed this time”, he said on an Indian TV station, as cited by the Hindustan Times.

The finance minister went on to accuse Pakistan of sending terrorists to attack India, and said that Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s approach towards Islamabad has brought a change to the country’s policy:

“Till now, Pakistan’s policy was to send terrorists to carry out attacks, while our policy was to be defensive. Modi brought a small change in that. While we will continue to defend, we will also attack the main source of terrorism. The 2016 surgical strike was our first step, and the latest air strikes were the second”, he added.

Earlier this week, Pakistan arrested at least 44 members of Jaish-e Mohammad, including Mufti Abdul Raoof, the brother of the terror group’s leader.


On 26 February, India’s Air Force carried out an air raid on the alleged base of the Pakistan-based terrorist group, Jaish-e Mohammad, at Balakot, reportedly destroying a number of facilities. New Delhi’s assault was conducted in response to a suicide bomb attack claimed by Jaish-e Mohammad on a convoy with Indian security forces on 14 February that killed over 40 soldiers.

© REUTERS/ ANUSHREE FADNAVIS
India Asks US to Probe Pakistan's Alleged Breach of F-16 Deal Amid Escalated Tensions
While New Delhi claims that the air raid on Balakot was targeted against Jaish-e-Mohammad terrorists, which claimed responsibility for the 14 February deadly suicide attack on Indian paramilitary forces, Islamabad has strongly denied the allegations.


Pakistan contended that the Indian aircraft dropped their bombs in a wooded area, causing no damage or casualties, and that it was a pure act of aggression by the IAF which was promptly responded to by the Pakistan military.

Pakistani top civilian and military leaders also rejected India's claims that it had hit a "terrorist camp" inside Pakistan, warning that it would retaliate “at the time and place of its choosing” to Indian aggression.

READ MORE: Indian Army Shoots Down Pakistani Drone Along Int'l Border — Report

Pakistan's National Security Committee (NSC), comprising high-ranking officials including Prime Minister Imran Khan and Army Chief Qamar Javed Bajwa, said Khan would "engage with global leadership to expose irresponsible Indian policy".

I think i this narrative was only true on 26th. On 27th it became the opposite and Pakistan called their conventional bluff. Brutally exposed Indian airforce. Which is much bigger with better jets ..

 

[Mega_Man]

They're naive, Ask CIA if it was a bluff, and why did US THAAD was deployed in Israel in so urgency.

India is being humiliated at international level not only for destroying it's 7 jets but also for unsuccessful launching of spice bomb which is now being reverse engineered.

 

[Sheikh Rauf]

yeh qoam chahti hai kay in ka baira gharak ho... they wanna fight conventionally but we have first use policy and we sud keep it..

 

[M.Bison]

They're naive, Ask CIA if it was a bluff, and why did US THAAD was deployed in Israel in so urgency.
View attachment 545574
India is being humiliated at international level not only for destroying it's 7 jets but also for unsuccessful launching of spice bomb which is now being reverse engineered.

Were there some bomb that didn’t explode?

 

[Michael Corleone]

showed complete lack of credibility right there...

1965: wanted to do breakfast in lahore but almost lost amritsar
1971: our own civil war where they "helped" the majority...big whup!
1999: lost the highest and the most strategic peak in kargil. only the retarded indian mind high on cow-dung fumes would call this a victory!

'nuf said.

they claim they won 71 in 16 or so days... the fact that bengalis have been wearing pakistani army down for months and they only sought opportunity to humiliate and show off at the end doesn't enter their thick skull
about 1999 though, is the peak still occupied by pakistan? idk much and can't seem to find definitive facts to say who won.... all i hear from the indian friends of mine is that they were actually losing until the last few days when the soviets sent military support and only then they were able to defeat pakistan.... but i'm skeptical.... if anyone could link me to good sources would be welcome

 

[GumNaam]

they claim they won 71 in 16 or so days... the fact that bengalis have been wearing pakistani army down for months and they only sought opportunity to humiliate and show off at the end doesn't enter their thick skull
about 1999 though, is the peak still occupied by pakistan? idk much and can't seem to find definitive facts to say who won.... all i hear from the indian friends of mine is that they were actually losing until the last few days when the soviets sent military support and only then they were able to defeat pakistan.... but i'm skeptical.... if anyone could link me to good sources would be welcome

right...they conveniently choose to ignore the fact (just to give themselves a false and a fatal sense of bravado) that Pakistan Army was actually going up against nearly 55% of the population of Pakistan and most of the mukti bahani were actually Pakistan Army, Air Force and Navy's bengali soldiers, sailors and airmen who had rebelled for obvious reasons. basically, the bengalis did most if not all of the fighting and the indiots at the end came in the middle of the civil war to take the credit. In a military to military fight, indians don't stand a chance...their only saving grace is the adversary's internal turmoil. but those days are long gone. it is now time for india to suffer internal turmoils...what goes around, comes around.

 

[Michael Corleone]

right...they conveniently choose to ignore the fact (just to give themselves a false and a fatal sense of bravado) that Pakistan Army was actually going up against nearly 55% of the population of Pakistan and most of the mukti bahani were actually Pakistan Army, Air Force and Navy's bengali soldiers, sailors and airmen who had rebelled for obvious reasons. basically, the bengalis did most if not all of the fighting and the indiots at the end came in the middle of the civil war to take the credit. In a military to military fight, indians don't stand a chance...their only saving grace is the adversary's internal turmoil. but those days are long gone. it is now time for india to suffer internal turmoils...what goes around, comes around.

hey i mean they influenced in splitting a country into two, karma right.... the kashmiris, punjabis, kerelites and the bengalis in india was freedom and autonomy.... a ticking timebomb tbh

 

[GumNaam]

hey i mean they influenced in splitting a country into two, karma right.... the kashmiris, punjabis, kerelites and the bengalis in india was freedom and autonomy.... a ticking timebomb tbh

agreed. All the regional countries should capitalize on it and grab a piece of the indian pie now.

 

[newb3e]

so if we bomb banya heaven the only hindu country in the world will be destroyed and hindus will be left without a country! if these bastards dont get in line press the red fking button!