Pakistan's Forces at Siachin - World's highest battlefield

[Rank]

Pakistan has ZERO control and presence on the glacier. In fact, even Saltoro ridge is under Indian control, which happens to be to the west of the actual glacier.

lol according to Suriya Kiran ..

 

[Bang Galore]

lol according to Suriya Kiran ..

Funny right, when even this picture is labelled as Baltoro+K2 trek.......

Baltoro, Concordia& K2 B.C Trek | Snowland

 

[raja hindustani]

What does it matter whether it is Siachin or not. Lets just enjoy the pictures for what they are, rather than getting into useless debates.

 

[Bang Galore]

What does it matter whether it is Siachin or not. Lets just enjoy the pictures for what they are, rather than getting into useless debates.

It actually doesn't. Great pictures.

 

[surya kiran]

lol according to Suriya Kiran ..

Well, prove me wrong with on ground data. Would be nice and educative, if you could point out on a map positions of the Pak Army on the glacier?

Funny right, when even this picture is labelled as Baltoro+K2 trek.......

View attachment 53965

Baltoro, Concordia& K2 B.C Trek | Snowland

@Stealth Busted! And you are posting these photos on your FB page and presenting false facts to the poor Pakistani chaps on FB. Awesome

 

[Rank]

 

[ghazi52]

Great pictures.Thanks.

 

[Green Arrow]

Great Pics. Keep coming

 

[Rank]

 

[Inception-06]

Harsh weather treats officer and Jawan equally.

 

[blain2]

Pakistan has ZERO control and presence on the glacier. In fact, even Saltoro ridge is under Indian control, which happens to be to the west of the actual glacier.

The very same can be said about India in that India does not have COMPLETE control over the glacier either. Given the Pakistani positions, Indians cannot allow mountaineering expeditions onto the glacier. So while dominating the heights at the glacier is advantages tactically in that its hard to displace built up positions when you have to go up and fight, the reality is that neither country can realistically use the real estate for their purpose.
Like the LoC, Siachen is also frozen in the status-quo with both sides contesting.
So while you sit at the higher elevations, you also have more logistical challenges with supplying and dumping at the positions. We are occupying positions that prevent the glacier from being visited by tourists etc. The net benefit is none for either but it is also something that Pakistan won't give up on for as long as the Indians are there. The land is ours, and we are going to stay on it for as long as it takes for both sides to mutually demilitarize.

 

[Green Arrow]

A big salute to our brave soldiers.

 

[Alfa-Fighter]

The very same can be said about India in that India does not have COMPLETE control over the glacier either. Given the Pakistani positions, Indians cannot allow mountaineering expeditions onto the glacier. So while dominating the heights at the glacier is advantages tactically in that its hard to displace built up positions when you have to go up and fight, the reality is that neither country can realistically use the real estate for their purpose.
Like the LoC, Siachen is also frozen in the status-quo with both sides contesting.
So while you sit at the higher elevations, you also have more logistical challenges with supplying and dumping at the positions. We are occupying positions that prevent the glacier from being visited by tourists etc. The net benefit is none for either but it is also something that Pakistan won't give up on for as long as the Indians are there. The land is ours, and we are going to stay on it for as long as it takes for both sides to mutually demilitarize.

India can send expedition from its side.... India has complete control from lower part and higher side on the East & west. PAK troops on the lower side of the mountain on the west part.

India already overcome those challenges...

This is the same reason PAK don't want to acknowledge the Actual held position by both armies though 3rd Party. which will expose the myth of PA.

 

[surya kiran]

.

The very same can be said about India in that India does not have COMPLETE control over the glacier either. Given the Pakistani positions, Indians cannot allow mountaineering expeditions onto the glacier. So while dominating the heights at the glacier is advantages tactically in that its hard to displace built up positions when you have to go up and fight, the reality is that neither country can realistically use the real estate for their purpose.

Semantics. On ground, we are on the glacier. You are not on the glacier. Point made. Any photo showing Pakistani troops on Siachen is a lie.

Like the LoC, Siachen is also frozen in the status-quo with both sides contesting. So while you sit at the higher elevations, you also have more logistical challenges with supplying and dumping at the positions. We are occupying positions that prevent the glacier from being visited by tourists etc. The net benefit is none for either but it is also something that Pakistan won't give up on for as long as the Indians are there.

Your side is under your control. You can stay over there till kingdom comes. Be our guest. No tourist going there is fine with us. We are still trying to increase traffic to rest of India.

The land is ours, and we are going to stay on it for as long as it takes for both sides to mutually demilitarize.

Your point of view. Like I said, your side of the place, you do a dance party over there. We are not concerned.

 

[Rank]