Pakistan's Airborne Early Warning and Control Aircrafts

[Imran Khan]

No offence, but I don't rely on googling doodling for my info, unlike you.

So better keep me out of this...and keep on living in your lala land.

and we know well abut internal sources truth sir

 

[Safriz]

No offence, but I don't rely on googling doodling for my info, unlike you.

So better keep me out of this...and keep on living in your lala land.

sigh..

same old "The voices told me" ricochet.

 

[Jango]

sigh..

same old "The voices told me" ricochet.

Yada yada yada...

You wanna believe nothing happened, not my problem.

I stand by what I said on the morning of the attack even now.

 

[Safriz]

Yada yada yada...

You wanna believe nothing happened, not my problem.

I stand by what I said on the morning of the attack even now.

you have been changing your statement multiple times which was based on "Inside info"...so do us a favor and repeat what do you stand by?
You and some others on this forum have been spreading negative propaganda which is not good for national morale..
If you cant prove something why stand by it and make yourself look like a fool?

 

[SQ8]

sigh..

same old "The voices told me" ricochet.

Yada yada yada...

You wanna believe nothing happened, not my problem.

I stand by what I said on the morning of the attack even now.

Do you gentlemen even know what your disagreement is about?

 

[Jango]

you have been changing your statement multiple times which was based on "Inside info"...so do us a favor and repeat what do you stand by?
You and some others on this forum have been spreading negative propaganda which is not good for national morale..
If you cant prove something why stand by it and make yourself look like a fool?

You are the only one who is making a fool of himself, and I think by constantly replying to your nonsense, I am probably making a fool of myself by wasting time.

I have always stood by my comment that one aircraft was destroyed and other damaged.

The only time I said something else was very early morning, when the TV channels were showing a picture of IL-78 parked on the tarmac and saying this aircraft got some damage and all others were good. So I repeated that on the forum that by the looks of it, it's all good.

But later on, I got the truth and have stuck to it ever since. Got ridiculed, abused, threatened, provoked...didn't make a difference.

Ab tang na kar yar.

Bye...

 

[Safriz]

Do you gentlemen even know what your disagreement is about?

Good point..and actually yes and no.
I have reached the conclusion that all three were damaged to various extents.One has been declared not feasible for repair and the other two either have been repaired or will be repaired.
But i took a whole year and now evidence from various sources is compelling.Thats the only way an additional 17% of the original contract or 170 million USD contract can be justified.
I did not rely on some "Inside Info" despite my real life friend @Skywalker telling me so when he visited IDEAS exhibition and talked to someone.

But i am not sure what Nuclearpak has been saying..
He said all three destroyed and that we had only 3 AWACS...

 

[SQ8]

Good point..and actually yes and no.
I have reached the conclusion that all three were damaged to various extents.One has been declared not feasible for repair and the other two either have been repaired or will be repaired.
But i took a whole year and now evidence from various sources is compelling.Thats the only way an additional 17% of the original contract or 170 million USD contract can be justified.
I did not rely on some "Inside Info" despite my real life friend @Skywalker telling me so when he visited IDEAS exhibition and talked to someone.

But i am not sure what Nuclearpak has been saying..
He said all three destroyed and that we had only 3 AWACS...

I dont think you guys even know what your disagreement is nor did you ask NP to clarify his stand. You guys are arguing over whether there was a main market in Medina around 680 A.D whilst assuming that the argument is about if there was a lassi stand there.

 

[Jango]

But i am not sure what Nuclearpak has been saying..
He said all three destroyed and that we had only 3 AWACS...

Nope....

And not gonna clarify further.

 

[Imran Khan]

and no one has single pic of a damaged saas-2000

 

[VelocuR]

and no one has single pic of a damaged saas-2000

Yes, it was one Erieye damaged which was confirmed, I remember that day in Kamra base attack . Do you think, someone will take picture to show the public?

 

[Imran Khan]

Yes, it was one Erieye damaged which was confirmed, I remember that day in Kamra base attack . Do you think, someone will take picture to show the public?

yes why not ? we have 50 pics of damaged P3-Cs

 

[SQ8]

yes why not ? we have 50 pics of damaged P3-Cs

That sat in the middle of a City and were easy vantage shots. Not like Kamra.

 

[Imran Khan]

That sat in the middle of a City and were easy vantage shots. Not like Kamra.

and everyone can see a flame from 10km . now please show me same blast and flame smoke on kamra attack .air force didn't hide anything they informed that one saab was damaged by RPG hit on hanger its only here few want to destroy all of saab2000. and i am 99% sure there is no such internal info things .

 

[VelocuR]

yes why not ? we have 50 pics of damaged P3-Cs

Yes, it was parked outside, which can taken photo during sunny beautiful day, however, they learned their lesson to control public information. No one will see the picture of damaged Erieye inside the hanger and Google map I have used before is not always accurate.