Pakistani Scientist Negates Ohm's Law, Conducts electricity through Non Con

[danger007]

Mixing Non Conductors to create a sort of conductor.....If i may put it for you

---------- Post added at 06:59 PM ---------- Previous post was at 06:57 PM ----------


Do you know what word "Atom" means? and what happened subsequently what we call fission and fusion.....There is always an evolution......

---------- Post added at 07:01 PM ---------- Previous post was at 06:59 PM ----------


Of course, we still call atom an "Atom" after it being no longer "Atom"

atom? how you are relating atom, there should be free path to flow electron. resistivity level will be very high in non-conductor, which is impossible pass electron through it.do you know about losses. please provide credible source instead blindly arguing.

 

[MM_Haider]

Pakistani Scientist Negates Ohm's Law, Conducts electricity through Non Conducting Materials

Wow.. but wonder why this hasn't published in some papers at international conferences..

 

[I spikes therefore I am]

Well, please tell me first what exactly this "achievement" is, before high-fiving endlessly.

It is completely fake news with lack of creditable source.

 

[VCheng]

It is completely fake news with lack of creditable source.

This is what I fear too, sadly.

 

[SBD-3]

I have tried, but failed to find any peer-reviewed scientific publications on this body of work. Perhaps you know of a source?

The guy also has a website, the link of which i have also posted here, may be we can use questions tab over there to get the details about the news (including evidence of truth or falsification)
.::A.I.K Technologies::.

 

[Splurgenxs]

What i read on the sight link......total gibberish for morons...

Technologies are emerging day by day in every discipline and there effecient utilization has been a task that is worth researching and digging. Infact, this research is making the world to enter in a technological era! But the efficient utiliztion of any specific technology has always been a tedious work.

Researchers and scientists are continously working to optimize the ways of technology utilization and their optimal engagment. The same is the concept of A.I.K, A.I.K Technology is nothing but the use of nature in a proper sequential manner and through suitable methodology to generate an unusual amplified impact that could bring about a useful Kinematic change in the natural products or processes.

Pellentesque at dui risus. Fusce congue molestie consequat. Vestibulum eget nibh id ante semper blandit non nec dui. Proin pharetra dignissim arcu quis eleifend. Mauris vitae velit id sem pretium faucibus in sit amet tortor. Vestibulum eleifend, erat non mollis consequat, ipsum ipsum imperdiet lectus, nec dictum nibh leo vulputate tellus. Sed sapien nibh, pulvinar eu eleifend et, blandit ac sapien.

LOL at the bolded part....Heh heh ....seriously WTH
Is he describing technology or some vague form quantum mechanics?

 

[SBD-3]

atom? how you are relating atom, there should be free path to flow electron. resistivity level will be very high in non-conductor, which is impossible pass electron through it.do you know about losses. please provide credible source instead blindly arguing.

You didn't get the catch.....There is a very interesting history in physics, While the discoveres of "Atom" named it so because Atom means "indivisible", however, the discovery of nuclear fission and subseqently neucleos and electrons falsified the old concept of indivisibilty. This breakthrough sparked a further expension in physics (nuclear branch) which was not possible before, a ground breaking discovery led to revison of prior concepts. Same happened again, when at the proposal of newton's laws of motion, it was thought that Physics is now complete and needs nothing more left to discover until the ground breaking discovery of quantum physics which expanded on the revolutionary equation of E=MC^2 . And now even this equation is challanged by the introduction of new concept of "God particle" which is deemed necessary for sparking energy to mass conversion. So laws we see are only proposed theories which are not finalized....

 

[mautkimaut]

Dielectric breakdown requires too much voltage..If this scientist has discovered Di-electric breakdown, then Kudos to him for the achievement..

There is nothing new about dielectric breakdown.
and I guess by mixing metals with insulators,

He is simulating the effects pollution has on the insulators used normally in power transmission

One of my professor R.S. Gorayan was working on it.

You can search google to get relevant links.


In fact regarding Dielectric breakdown,

I did an experiment to study arcing in Air,

Argon , Carbon Strip and that too in my 4th year of B.Tech

 

[Splurgenxs]

^^ well failing of an insulator under large voltages cant be considered success can it? i thnk its studied to improve insulation in materials and objects?

@hasnain0099
Lol buddy ... at least lets have a proper reason and explanation as to how a non conductor conducts EMW.
Either a medium conducts through ions or electron transfer(semiconductors) ...u cant change the nature of a non conductor to conduct ...cus then it would then be a conductor wouldn't it.

Don't mingle theoretical physics with practical...as is the case of God particle or whatever ti is...

 

[danger007]

You didn't get the catch.....There is a very interesting history in physics, While the discoveres of "Atom" named it so because Atom means "indivisible", however, the discovery of nuclear fission and subseqently neucleos and electrons falsified the old concept of indivisibilty. This breakthrough sparked a further expension in physics (nuclear branch) which was not possible before, a ground breaking discovery led to revison of prior concepts. Same happened again, when at the proposal of newton's laws of motion, it was thought that Physics is now complete and needs nothing more left to discover until the ground breaking discovery of quantum physics which expanded on the revolutionary equation of E=MC^2 . And now even this equation is challanged by the introduction of new concept of "God particle" which is deemed necessary for sparking energy to mass conversion. So laws we see are only proposed theories which are not finalized....

don't tel me 10th class stories. im asked how exactly the resistivity level reduced in non-conductor.

 

[I spikes therefore I am]

The guy also has a website, the link of which i have also posted here, may be we can use questions tab over there to get the details about the news (including evidence of truth or falsification)
.::A.I.K Technologies::.

That website is not credible source . If v know about person name (who discovered) or name of Institute that is more than enough and it able to track his previous research work and it progress . If somebody provide that above info V can refine our search. As far I knw It havn't published in any peer reviewed journals.

 

[sarthak]

This is what I fear too, sadly.

Cheer up bro , why are you so sad? Look at it this way , if ohm's law had been proved incorrect , our entire 11th grade physics would go waste , that's if you were a science student. I'm sure you wouldn't want that to happen

 

[I spikes therefore I am]

The guy also has a website, the link of which i have also posted here, may be we can use questions tab over there to get the details about the news (including evidence of truth or falsification)
.::A.I.K Technologies::.

That website is not a credible source . If v know about person name (who discovered) or name of Institute that is more than enough and it able to track his previous research work and it current progress . If somebody provide that above info V can refine our search. As far I knw It havn't published in any peer reviewed journals.

 

[sarthak]

double post

 

[I spikes therefore I am]

Cheer up bro , why are you so sad? Look at it this way , if ohm's law had been proved incorrect , our entire 11th grade physics would go waste , that's if you were a science student. I'm sure you wouldn't want that to happen

Dude try to understand the fact science is dynamic u can't say everything in science is absolute. If thIS news is true it is nothing but other form of law . According to science object which is lighter than air can fly/float in air ,but now planes are flying .In chemistry i think u knw Markovnikov's rules and antiMarkonikov's rules so u trying to say antiMarkonikov's disproving the former . Both rules explaining context in different extent.