Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
super powers provide ration , electricity , education , respectful passport to its citizens .Of course. Let me keep my nose out of the 2nd supa powa's (that's you) business.
Very true .I used to see India as a remote threat in the past but now know that India just wants to improve its economy and lift its people out of poverty just like BD.
India has no intention to cause harm to BD as then it would just be harming itself.
that is the thing: for bangladesh to survive, still, and to be seen different, and to promote its nationalism, pakistan must, must, must be shown as a bogeyman. otherwise there was no reason for separation and a separate country. until and unless bangalis are fed lies and propagandas of mass rapes and genocides, bangladesh has no reason to come into being.That's the reason I am questioning our own government's action of asking for an apology as if it matters. Pakistan is irrelevant to our future
Ok Enjoy your present great status acquired with great efforts in this world .mr india you just joined, i am sure the world is sincere to indians that shi t in the streets.
that is the thing: for bangladesh to survive, still, and to be seen different, and to promote its nationalism, pakistan must, must, must be shown as a bogeyman. otherwise there was no reason for separation and a separate country. until and unless bangalis are fed lies and propagandas of mass rapes and genocides, bangladesh has no reason to come into being.
and since paksitan is irrelevant to you, why waste time on pakistan defence forum, and comment on a thread related to pakistan bangladesh relations?
Like I say economic realities will force Pakistan to apologise for it's behaviour in 1971 in the not too distanct future.
BD nation as a whole has no concern if Pakistani apologies as there is nothing that Pakistan can offer it now or in the future.
that is the thing: for bangladesh to survive, still, and to be seen different, and to promote its nationalism, pakistan must, must, must be shown as a bogeyman. otherwise there was no reason for separation and a separate country. until and unless bangalis are fed lies and propagandas of mass rapes and genocides, bangladesh has no reason to come into being.
and since paksitan is irrelevant to you, why waste time on pakistan defence forum, and comment on a thread related to pakistan bangladesh relations?
as bangladesh? yes it does. bangali nationalism is something different. bangladesh as a nation state does.Bangladesh doesn't need Pakistan as a bogeyman to SURVIVE. Bangladesh is already surviving without Pakistan and thriving. No further discussion is required.
lol, what an idiot.Pakistan has moved practically zero economically in 76 years of independence.
New Recruit
lol.if you guys don’t care than why are you venting here?BD nation as a whole has no concern if Pakistani apologies as there is nothing that Pakistan can offer it now or in the future.
Current government does not represent the thinking of most BD'shis and I personally could not care less if Pakistan apologised or not as there is nothing to be gained for BD from either an economic or strategic perspective here.
On the other hand, BD will become a middle-income nation in the 2030s and then Pakistan will need all the economic help it can get like access to a huge market and potential investments from BD that only normalised relations will open up.
Like I say economic realities will force Pakistan to apologise for it's behaviour in 1971 in the not too distanct future.
PS - Why do you think anyone in BD actually thinks that Pakistan committed genocide in BD? It committed war crimes for sure against a civilian population and we need a full apology and any still alive that are guilty need to be held accountable.
Well, Yahya and his cronies were already traitors for having abrogated the Constitution. Sovereignty belongs to the people, not some womanising drunkard jarnails. Mujib had the mandate of the people, who are sovereign. Where did Yahya get his mandate ?Disregarding the constitution?
The country had no constitution after March 1969, and the 1970 General Elections were held under LFO issued (illegally of course) by a dictator ..
Sheikh Mujib was rigidly adamant about making his "6 points Formula" the basis of the new constitution. He wanted separate currency and military forces for East Pakistan. That was unacceptable to the Pakistan Army as it stood for the integrity of Pakistan. All reconciliation efforts failed, primarily due to over reliance of Bengali leadership on India. Transferring power to Sheikh Mujib was akin to making Indra Gandhi the PM of Pakistan. But the Bengalis realizing that they cannot force Gen Yahya to accept their demands, resorted to violence and terrorism. The rest is history
Well, Yahya and his cronies were already traitors for having abrogated the Constitution. Sovereignty belongs to the people, not some womanising drunkard jarnails. Mujib had the mandate of the people, who are sovereign. Where did Yahya get his mandate ?
Ok Enjoy your present great status acquired with great efforts in this world .
Bengal, that BD used to dominate, composed 50% of Mughal GDP with circa 22% of the population.
Where did you get those figures from?
As per the 16th century Ain-i-Akbari (official Mughal records), Subah Lahore (central Punjab) generated as much revenue (~56 crore dam per annum) as Subah Bengal (~59 core dam) despite the fact that Subah Bengal was almost 3 times larger than Subah Lahore. People of Punjab were much more prosperous than Bengalis during the Mughal period. Punjab was much more prosperous than Bengal during the British colonial rule. Punjab was much more prosperous than Bengal in 1947. "Punjab eating up Bengal resources" after the creation of Pakistan was a myth created by Bengali nationalists and gullible Bengalis fell for it
Where did you get those figures from?
As per the 16th century Ain-i-Akbari (official Mughal records), Subah Lahore (central Punjab) generated as much revenue (~56 crore dam per annum) as Subah Bengal (~59 core dam) despite the fact that Subah Bengal was almost 3 times larger than Subah Lahore. People of Punjab were much more prosperous than Bengalis during the Mughal period. Punjab was much more prosperous than Bengal during the British colonial rule. Punjab was much more prosperous than Bengal in 1947. "Punjab eating up Bengal resources" after the creation of Pakistan was a myth created by Bengali nationalists and gullible Bengalis fell for it