Pakistani file plea to prove Bhagat Singh innocent

[Redbull]

God save the queen!!!

 

[Raja.Pakistani]

What is the difference between bhagat singh and those who is fighting for freedom of kasmir ?

one was terrorist for britian while the other ones were terrorist for india

taliban fighting for USA against USSR are freedom fighters

talbaan fighting against USA are terrorist

And same is the case with those fighting for palestenians rights ..the difference between terrorist and freedom fighters is vague and very much depend on your own like or dislike

pakistan have many better things to do than proving innocense of bhagat gone long time ago

 

[A.Rafay]

No need for these useless pleas! No body cares we have bigger problems than this!

 

[SamantK]

What is the difference between bhagat singh and those who is fighting for freedom of kasmir ?

The difference is a country sponsors them to fight where as Bhagat Singh was doing it for the people of the land. A country sends terrorist brainwashed religiously, that my friend is a terrorist.

Please do not disrespect Bhagat Singh by comparing the terrorists of Kashmir, the LeT which has 94% people from Punjab, Pakistan are no freedom fighters for Kashmir.

 

[ares]

What is the difference between bhagat singh and those who is fighting for freedom of kasmir ?

one was terrorist for britian while the other ones were terrorist for india

taliban fighting for USA against USSR are freedom fighters

talbaan fighting against USA are terrorist

And same is the case with those fighting for palestenians rights ..the difference between terrorist and freedom fighters is vague and very much depend on your own like or dislike

By your logic ever terrorist is fighting for, some or the other cause ..may that be freedom, imposing certain laws , change in governance etc.

So what is difference b/w terrorist and a freedom fighter.

A Freedom fighter is fighting against an institution like govt or the state and terrorist terrorizes the people and govt alike.

eg some of your most prominent Kashmiri freedom fighting groups like LeT, JeM, HM etc. are in actuallity terrorists groups.

 

[Raja.Pakistani]

The difference is a country sponsors them to fight where as Bhagat Singh was doing it for the people of the land. A country sends terrorist brainwashed religiously, that my friend is a terrorist.

Please do not disrespect Bhagat Singh by comparing the terrorists of Kashmir, the LeT which has 94% people from Punjab, Pakistan are no freedom fighters for Kashmir.

I am not disrespecting anyone and i am saying its matter of perception

Is it ok for people to use violence for any political goal or for any freedom movement ?

now definition of terrorist is someone who use terror/violence for any political agenda

No need for these useless pleas! No body cares we have bigger problems than this!

Yea zindoon ko insaaf nhi mil rha aur hum murdoon ko insaaf dilaney ki baat kar rhey hein

 

[Bhai Zakir]

Before questioning Pakistan can you tell me is there any statue of Bhagat Singh installed in India?

or when it was installed?


Then i will reply your question.

am waiting

There are thousands of statue of Bhagat Singh installed all over India and most of the big cities have a road named after bhagat singh.

 

[Raja.Pakistani]

So what is difference b/w terrorist and a freedom fighter.

A Freedom fighter is fighting against an institution like govt or the state and terrorist terrorizes the people and govt alike.
.

My bholey friend

Do you think bhagat singh had ability to fight a conventional war against institution/ Government or British army ?

His war was not much different than war going on between Taliban and NATO forces..even talibans are better organise and are greater in number compare to one man army of Bhagat singh which achieved nothing

This is what Gandhi said on singh execution

, "The government certainly had the right to hang these men. However, there are some rights which do credit to those who possess them only if they are enjoyed in name only."

While Gandhi did appreciate Singh's patriotism and how he had overcome the fear of death, he did not support the violence involved

Source : Wiki

 

[joekrish]

You may be reffering to a different user

Can any Indian tell me when were Bhagat Singh's statues installed in India

March 2008 in the parliment.

Source - The Hindu : National : Bhagat Singh statue to be installed

 

[ares]

My bholey friend

Do you think bhagat singh had ability to fight a conventional war against institution/ Government or British army ?

His war was not much different than war going on between Taliban and NATO forces..even talibans are better organise and are greater in number compare to one man army or Bhagat singh

This what Gandhi said on singh execution

, "The government certainly had the right to hang these men. However, there are some rights which do credit to those who possess them only if they are enjoyed in name only."

While Gandhi did appreciate Singh's patriotism and how he had overcome the fear of death, he did not support the violence involved

Source : Wiki

Do you think he was he interested in fighting a war against the govt?

As a kid he was thoroughly disappointed after Non -cooperation movement was called after Chori-chora incidents. He lost his faith in congress and Mahatama Gandhi.

He and his party "Hindustan Socialist Republican Association" had a singular aim to spread the message, mobilize the masses and initiate a political movement which will acheive Indian independence through a revolutionary means.

 

[DESERT FIGHTER]

God save the queen!!!

Tht old hag?

 

[Raja.Pakistani]

Do you think he was he interested in fighting a war against the govt?

As a kid he was thoroughly disappointed after Non -cooperation movement was called after Chori-chora incidents. He lost his faith in congress and Mahatama Gandhi.

He and his party "Hindustan Socialist Republican Association" had a singular aim to spread the message, mobilize the masses and initiate a political movement which will acheive Indian independence through a revolutionary means.

May i know what were those revolutionary means ?

throwing two bombs inside the Central Legislative Assembly while shouting Inquilab Zindabad

Or assassination of British police officer John Saunders ?

Did India really got independence through any of these revolutionary means ?

India got independence after 17 years of his death and Britain left India because they could not manage it any more after their involvement in world wars

BTW how many Indians support communist ideology of Bhagat Singh ?

 

[asad71]

educate yourself

Pathetic, you Indians. Don't know your heroes or history; and posing to be a great big mighty super duper power.

 

[Abu Zolfiqar]

Not a waste of time per se but definitely not a top priority

He was however a freedom fighter and NOT a terrorist.

Nor were the people of FATA who taught them good lessons time to time

 

[ares]

May i know what were those revolutionary means ?

throwing two bombs inside the Central Legislative Assembly while shouting Inquilab Zindabad

Or assassination of British police officer John Saunders

did India really got independence through any of these revolutionary means

India got independence after 17 years of his death and Britain left India because they could not manage it any more after their involvement in world wars

BTW how many Indians support communist ideology of Bhagat Singh ?

Meaning of revolution should be fairly obvious..after who here has not herd of Russian revolution or the french revolution or even the revolt of 1857.

Bombs were thrown in assembly not to kill people or even seriously injure anyone but to spread their message , after throwing the bombs they did not run or try to escape .. instead were throwing leaflets ..so that press, the people, hear their message and actively join Indian independence struggle.

Saunders assassination was revenge for Lala Lajpat Rai murder in a lathi charge on peaceful non-violent protest.

India did not get it independence by a revolution , because after 1857 .. common man had just lost the will for a bloody revolution.

Had their no been world wars, common man's apathy would still have us as the slaves of British.

He was socialist and marxist. There was little support for Capitalism(associated with imperialist powers in those days) back then.