Pakistan will soon get J10

[graphican]

WS-10, Aesa

Can somebody with hawk-eyes tell if the model is J-10B or J-10A ?

Looking at the tail part, I think it is J-10A model. BUT I WISH I WISH I WISH IT WOULD BE J-10B!!!

 

[arp2041]

Can somebody with hawk-eyes tell if the model is J-10B or J-10A ?

wait let me see......

 

[genmirajborgza786]

Don't you think losing the entire PAF fleet would bring Pakistan and not India negotiating the way out... ?.. Last time not even half of PAF fleet was down and Pakistan lost 1/3 of its territory

dude if you re referring to Bangladesh then for your kind information its nowhere even near 1/3 rd of Pakistan

Pakistan + Pakistan administered Kashmir is 339,000 sq ml. = 878,005 sq km while Bangladesh is 56,000 sq mi = 147,000 sq km now you do the maths Pakistan is more then 6 times the size of Bangladesh heck Pakistan in land area is larger then Bangladesh,Myanmar & Bhutan put together.

 

[Armstrong]

dude if you re referring to Bangladesh then for your kind information its nowhere even near 1/3 rd of Pakistan

Pakistan + Pakistan administered Kashmir is 339,000 sq ml. = 878,005 sq km while Bangladesh is 56,000 sq mi = 147,000 sq km now you do the maths Pakistan is more then 6 times the size of Bangladesh heck Pakistan in land area is larger then Bangladesh,Myanmar & Bhutan put together.

Buttt Sahib please change the country flags...hum sutaillloon ko bhi apnaa looo !

And if there is one person from Pakistan's history books I admire its Muhammad Ali Jinnah (Our Father) !

 

[Dazzler]

customized j-10, dual seat with new bubble canopy unlike j-10S, AESA radar, EW housing on vertical tail, no DSI, IFR installed, new avionics and IRST, WS-10 instead of AL-31FN.

 

[sancho]

customized j-10, dual seat with new bubble canopy unlike j-10S, AESA radar, EW housing on vertical tail, no DSI, IFR installed, new avionics and IRST, WS-10 instead of AL-31FN.

And now check graphican pic once again, because you are describing a twin seat J10A.

 

[A.Rafay]

First your planes have to get pass our air defence system of which we have Israeli systems which is unmatched

seems like the hizbollahs drones cant be spotted by this so called unmatched Israeli systems!!! uhh How will it spot Fighter planes when it cant spot Hizbollahs drone!!!

 

[Donatello]

The notion that China gonna fight a war with India for Pakistan is totally false, why will China fight a war with a nation with whom it has some $60+ billion of trade which is only going to increase in the coming years as the two Asian giants rise, & for the sake of that nation with whom it has no economic gains?? This thinking of the people of Pakistan that China will come as a savior vis-a-vis India is completely without basis, & the faster they understand this the better, there is no permanent friends in International affairs but only permanent interests, China thought that it's interests are best served by friendship with India pre-1962, so it did that, post-1962 it thought that it's interests are best served with a friendship with Pakistan so it quickly changed sides. China din't came to save Pakistan in it's hour of need in 1971, now this is 21st century where the economic relations between the nations decide the political relations between the nations. China is not going to jeopardize it's billions of trade with India for the sake of Pakistan, even if it does than what do u think, will Russia & US be watching this from the sidelines?? So what u r thinking about is the recipe of a third world war & not a defeat of India.

You seriously lack comprehension skills, don't you?

Where did i mention in my post that China will fight the war for Pakistan?

What i meant was that India cannot afford to let it's IAF lose aircraft, because that will leave its flanks vulnerable elsewhere.

China will not fight a war for Pakistan, but remember, It can supply Aircraft and ammunition.

Also, Pakistan's western border doesn't pose much threat relating to a future air war, i mean Afghan and Iran airforce are not an issue here. And not China either. Yes USAF is there, but they will be soon leaving. Thus Pakistan can field all 300 of it's 4 and 4+ gen aircraft on the eastern border. Indian cannot push all it's 600 high tech aircraft on the west. It does need to take care of the north and north east, and depending on how Bangladesh aligns itself with China or India, India might need to field larger number on the east as well.

The rest of your post is all about what i didn't even mention. Sometimes i wonder if illusions is the new Indian National Past time.

 

[deckingraj]

You seriously lack comprehension skills, don't you?

Where did i mention in my post that China will fight the war for Pakistan?

What i meant was that India cannot afford to let it's IAF lose aircraft, because that will leave its flanks vulnerable elsewhere.

China will not fight a war for Pakistan, but remember, It can supply Aircraft and ammunition.

Also, Pakistan's western border doesn't pose much threat relating to a future air war, i mean Afghan and Iran airforce are not an issue here. And not China either. Yes USAF is there, but they will be soon leaving. Thus Pakistan can field all 300 of it's 4 and 4+ gen aircraft on the eastern border. Indian cannot push all it's 600 high tech aircraft on the west. It does need to take care of the north and north east, and depending on how Bangladesh aligns itself with China or India, India might need to field larger number on the east as well.

The rest of your post is all about what i didn't even mention. Sometimes i wonder if illusions is the new Indian National Past time.

It is interesting to see same/similar points are repeated again and again....Anyhow if a war is going on with Pakistan then it is logical i am not going to loose that war just because i believe that putting my thrust is going to make me vulnerable to some threat that may or may not arrive...Mind it i am not saying that we will not be watching Chinese and their movement but what's the fun in loosing the war that is on for a war that may not happen?? Yes, we will not want to loose too many Aircrafts(heck we would not want to loose any) but unfortunately if we do then we would have no choice but to use the rest and fight to the last bullet, no??

Your points are valid pre war position with Pakistan...All these scenarios would be played over and over again..but god forbids if and when war break out then winning that would be the supreme priority....

 

[arp2041]

You seriously lack comprehension skills, don't you?

Where did i mention in my post that China will fight the war for Pakistan?

What i meant was that India cannot afford to let it's IAF lose aircraft, because that will leave its flanks vulnerable elsewhere.

China will not fight a war for Pakistan, but remember, It can supply Aircraft and ammunition.

Also, Pakistan's western border doesn't pose much threat relating to a future air war, i mean Afghan and Iran airforce are not an issue here. And not China either. Yes USAF is there, but they will be soon leaving. Thus Pakistan can field all 300 of it's 4 and 4+ gen aircraft on the eastern border. Indian cannot push all it's 600 high tech aircraft on the west. It does need to take care of the north and north east, and depending on how Bangladesh aligns itself with China or India, India might need to field larger number on the east as well.

The rest of your post is all about what i didn't even mention. Sometimes i wonder if illusions is the new Indian National Past time.

sorry sir, i may lack the comprehension skills, but i wanted to clear some misconceptions of the Pakistani members here, so don't take my post personally

 

[Donatello]

sorry sir, i may lack the comprehension skills, but i wanted to clear some misconceptions of the Pakistani members here, so don't take my post personally

First of all, i didn't mean any offense, but that the fact you were implying something i never intended in my post.

I am not one of those Pakistanis living in delusional world. I do know the handicap of PAF and IAF and we have to analyze according to what is going around in the rest of the region. It's not as simple as 300 Sukhois or Rafales taking to the air and owning everything. Wars are a costly affair in terms of both manpower and physical assets, not as simple as 2+2=4, as many Pakistani and Indian members make it to be, here on this forum.

 

[Storm Force]

Banking on CHINA keeping IAF busy in the next war is a very dangerous assumption on the PAKISTANIS.

THE CHINEASE DID NOT mass planes and troops on india,s border in 1999 kargil or in 1971

DESPITE pakistanis claims to the contrary india china trade is $100 billion and set to triple in a decade does this inducate hostility.

3rd Chinease des[pite being a major military power house ARE not a avertly aggressive nation. They do not take to arms as reasdily as the USA thev ISRAELIS or the europeans. THEY have never threatened TAIWAN in military terms. So i ASK AGAIN wat is this notion that IAF needs to guard against north.

4th FINALLY i suggest you read up on INDIA,S nuclear TRIAD ie abou 100 missles on LAND SEA & AIR including AGNI prithvi & sagrika THAT MAY DISSUADE a china to get involved in indo pak mess.

 

[batmannow]

Banking on CHINA keeping IAF busy in the next war is a very dangerous assumption on the PAKISTANIS.

THE CHINEASE DID NOT mass planes and troops on india,s border in 1999 kargil or in 1971

DESPITE pakistanis claims to the contrary india china trade is $100 billion and set to triple in a decade does this inducate hostility.

3rd Chinease des[pite being a major military power house ARE not a avertly aggressive nation. They do not take to arms as reasdily as the USA thev ISRAELIS or the europeans. THEY have never threatened TAIWAN in military terms. So i ASK AGAIN wat is this notion that IAF needs to guard against north.

4th FINALLY i suggest you read up on INDIA,S nuclear TRIAD ie abou 100 missles on LAND SEA & AIR including AGNI prithvi & sagrika THAT MAY DISSUADE a china to get involved in indo pak mess.

& thts why india has devloped a dam ICBM?
for pakistan?lol
ohh its china???

 

[Dazzler]

And now check graphican pic once again, because you are describing a twin seat J10A.

The model is of the FC_20 which is a customized J-10A and B version as per our requirements, a twin seat fighter. Notice the B's nose, EW housing, IFR, a stretched dual seat capable canopy unlike what we saw in J-10S, intake is non-DSI, engine nozzle reminds me of WS-10.

 

[Safriz]

J-10 fighter planes, 6 marines for Pakistan as Cino-Pak talks underway | The News Tribe

A news report from march 2012.
Mentioning j-10,nuclear reactors and submarines from china for Pakistan..