What's new

Pakistan to purchase latest fighter planes, submarines: Tanveer

About 2 Months ago PAF have tested Su35 with a delegation of 16...

not sure about that they are talking about Su35 or something else
And where you got this news from

PAF is interested to know about Su-30M2 & Su-35BMs and Russia want to pitch Mig-35s, but those are just rumors. But even if Pakistan goes for Mig-35Ds as per comment of an IAF pilot on Russia Pakistan military collaboration, he said Mig-35s could end up in Pakistan's hand and it will become very messy for IAF as those are very potent platform and Mig-29 are operated by IAF.
Well what I wish is if we can get 40 MIG-35 for our Navy but that is not possible so better focus on getting 20 to 30 MI-28 and 2 different Air Defense systems with 10 to 12 batteries each
 
.
HA!!! where are the Indian members who were going bananas when I mentioned that Pakistan and Russia will cross weapons purchases over a couple of billions within 12 - 24 months and that it would include Jets, SAMS and BVRs, a few months ago in a thread??

Twin turbines are coming to the PAF. Much needed capability. SU-35 would be a better option to go for. I would say, purchasing weapons from Russia should not mean to ignore a Fifth Gen Stealthy platform, may be through China. That will be much needed in the next 3-5 years for sure.
Russia too giving you softloans for purchasing weapons???
 
.
[Don't E="orangzaib, post: 6515431, member: 45"]HA!!! where are the Indian members who were going bananas when I mentioned that Pakistan and Russia will cross weapons purchases over a couple of billions within 12 - 24 months and that it would include Jets, SAMS and BVRs, a few months ago in a thread??

Twin turbines are coming to the PAF. Much needed capability. SU-35 would be a better option to go for. I would say, purchasing weapons from Russia should not mean to ignore a Fifth Gen Stealthy platform, may be through China. That will be much needed in the next 3-5 years for sure.[/QUOTE]

Dont be so optimistic. Let Russians confirm it....
Pakistanis have been saying many things but not actually materialising any thing.
What about submarine from China.....
 
.
Yes, it has to be. There are many factors. This is a win-win situation for the Russians and for the Pakistanis. There is no other country at this time and outside of the Western influence, connected with road to China and Russia (and India and Central Asia), that has about $ 50 billion worth of investment incoming. This will put the Pakistani economy on vertical climb, starting in the next 2-3 years. You'll start to see it.
What happens then? The need for Oil and Gas will increase two folds. Russia wants to capture that market. It can supply Pakistan with cheap oil and not hurt as much due to the Europeans not buying it. So, they get multi-billion and more by selling oil, gas and other services to Pakistan. And Pakistan THEN pays a few billions for nice toys like the SU-37 and BVR and SAMs.
Guess what? This is a strategic relationship. Pakistan can't quit buying gas from Russia as it'll need advance weapons and it'll expand trade with the Russians. Russians on the other hand, will make money both ways, by selling gas and by selling weapons. So yea..everything will be cleared as the time passes.

India has too much Western competition inside of it. What remains out of competition from the West is the high speed rail links and infrastructure. The Chinese and Japanese are masters at that. No place for Russia. Plus, the Indians want to start building and selling advance weapons based on Western designs. So Russian defense industry will eventually take a hit in starting in the next 5-8 years. So why lose the moment to become part of one of the faster growing economies linked directly by road or a few hours of flight and get a huge profit out of that market, which offers more money and less competition....
@orangzaib and @Irfan Baloch

Nice discussion as one can see but we need to think whats in the best of interests of Pakistan first. Weapons can come and go but what matters is that a stable economy is needed in order to keep on buying weapons and keeping our minimum deterrent against india more realistic in the future as well. In such a case our TAPI or Russian gas deal is not a very good option. For a few main reasons.......

1) The main goal for us is the favorable deal we can get and by this we will sideline iran out of this picture. That irani gas pipeline deal is more favorable since its very coast effective, since the pipeline itself will come directly from iran to pak. From Russia it has to go through other formal soviat states and their loyalty with soviats with passage of time is getting low. The main clue is the countries like Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, Even Uzbekistan are not interested in being part of the future Russian EuroAsia Union that Russia now wants to make. So if we still buy the gas from them realistically its not possible to keep them out of American influence specially countries like Turkmenistan and Afghanistan. So if TAPI is being discussed here then out planners here in pak's strategic front are not very interested in it specially when we have the irani option on the table.

2) If we really go for lets say TAPI or any other deal besides iran or not giving something to it for counter balance of her indian influence (chahbahar port, transit routs to Afghanistan and Indian buying oil and gas from them amidst lots of international pressure)which can turn out to be counter productive for us, since indians will strengthen themselves as more reliable partner in the irani eyes.

3) Then what can happen is that since afghans cant be very much trusted since its the northern alliance mainly in their upper class now and their relations with indians are legendary from Farkhor Air Base - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia in Tajikistan. And with Pak ignoring Iran completely will be seen in iran as pak's loyalty with western interests which is primarily to isolate iran economically to save israeli and american interests in west bank and greater middle east.

4) Now that can iran do? it will them agree with indians to use their territory (either limited use or more) against baluchistan or through afghanistan. Now when we are gain going with Kashmir cause and if God forbid a war brakes out and iran and india somehow sign a defense deal then it will allow indians or maybe iranis to attack in our backyards while we are fighting indians in the east. This was something their RSS chief Capt Mohan Bhagat has predicted in indiandefence review website in 2008 for his wishful thinking of breaking balochistan/NWFP from pakistan, @Spring Onion had shared that thread with us. This opinion was echoed by Dr Amarjit Singhhttp://www.indiandefencereview.com/news/why-the-existence-of-pakistan-is-not-in-indias-interest/
Combating Terrorism means Combating Pakistan » Indian Defence Review
Pakistan must not be India’s neighbor » Indian Defence Review who is another radical from the same website. Since now these radicals are very much part of indian bureaucracy both military and civil so regardless of it congress or BJP is in helm of affairs these will always be there to jeopardize any peace (kashmir) or trade b/w pak and india in future since hostilities serve them best! in order to keep their country more under western weapons influence. Which will undermine the region stability to keep Pakistan's economy stable.

5) So what should we do? In this case its ideal to maintain a bit of balance with iran as well so they are not pressurized by india to sign some sort of defence deal which will ensure the indians to use pak's backyard while we are busy fighting them in east in a war time scenario. So in order to do that we must give something to iran as well so they dont feel completely being isolated. SAARC's irani entry bid can be entertained in the next summit in pak as well as more co-operation with iran in middle east specially Syria can help build some sort of trust so that they dont feel isolated or betrayed.

International relations are sometimes like having more then one wife. Both need to engaged and must to kept happy for yr own good. Or like a moderator in PDF @Horus

So without jumping into conclusions and assumptions all factors must be taken into consideration specially indian (not so good) experience of maintaining a balance b/w Russia and West.
 
Last edited:
.
PAF is interested to know about Su-30M2 & Su-35BMs and Russia want to pitch Mig-35s, but those are just rumors. But even if Pakistan goes for Mig-35Ds as per comment of an IAF pilot on Russia Pakistan military collaboration, he said Mig-35s could end up in Pakistan's hand and it will become very messy for IAF as those are very potent platform and Mig-29 are operated by IAF.

All depends on the budget dost. $7 Billion is no match with Indian defence budget. If we manage to have at least $20 Billion next year then it is very likely that PAF would consider buying Russian jets. SU-35 would be much better option. AND we should stop relying on F16s now. Its a good aircraft but not the best.
 
. .
Russia too giving you softloans for purchasing weapons???

1) They are not giving "me" anything. They'll give whatever they have to, to Pakistan to make the deal. I think you need to be focused on countering the SU-37 than worrying about the finances. Obviously, you won't have to pay the loan back.

2) When a country is slated for over $ 75 billion foreign investment, a blind even knows 10% of the revenue internally to the government on that amount would be additional $ 7.5 billion. Usually, IRR is around 30% in situations like this. So all of a sudden, having additional $ 7 or 15 billion means Pakistan can spend a couple of billion cash on weapon purchasing. $ 1 billion down would get you any loan of your choice from the manufacturer. Just reality. And this is all about to happen as the Pakistani economy takes off in the next 2-3 years. Just watch how things workout.
 
.
must be Mi35 . Su35 doesn't suit our PAF doctrine (no twin engine fighters)
and is front line Russian fighter which we cant buy anyway
no it was su 35 .. they have tested it

but don't know they are interested in it or not
 
.
got it when i visited kamra ...
But I still doubt it because if we would want to go for another Fighter Jet than we would go for 40 to 60 J-10B as the start than slowly increase the number
 
.
1) They are not giving "me" anything. They'll give whatever they have to, to Pakistan to make the deal. I think you need to be focused on countering the SU-37 than worrying about the finances. Obviously, you won't have to pay the loan back.

2) When a country is slated for over $ 75 billion foreign investment, a blind even knows 10% of the revenue internally to the government on that amount would be additional $ 7.5 billion. Usually, IRR is around 30% in situations like this. So all of a sudden, having additional $ 7 or 15 billion means Pakistan can spend a couple of billion cash on weapon purchasing. $ 1 billion down would get you any loan of your choice from the manufacturer. Just reality. And this is all about to happen as the Pakistani economy takes off in the next 2-3 years. Just watch how things workout.
Well by "you" i meant pakistan which i believe you represent as a citizen and doesnt need rocket science to understand, and talking about IRR arising from investment cant be directed to straight away.military purchases, there should be gradual increase in defence budget for avoiding negative impact on economy, its investment not lottery that you go and buy a car from showroom.
 
.
@orangzeb and @Irfan Baloch

Nice discussion as one can see but we need to think whats in the best of interests of Pakistan first. Weapons can come and go but what matters is that a stable economy is needed in order to keep on buying weapons and keeping our minimum deterrent against india more realistic in the future as well. In such a case our TAPI or Russian gas deal is not a very good option. For a few main reasons.......

1) The main goal for us is the favorable deal we can get and by this we will sideline iran out of this picture. That irani gas pipeline deal is more favorable since its very coast effective, since the pipeline itself will come directly from iran to pak. From Russia it has to go through other formal soviat states and their loyalty with soviats with passage of time is getting low. The main clue is the countries like Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, Even Uzbekistan are not interested in being part of the future Russian EuroAsia Union that Russia now wants to make.

2) If we really go for lets say TAPI or any other deal besides iran or not giving something to it for counter balance of her indian influence (chahbahar port, transit routs to Afghanistan and Indian buying oil and gas from them amidst lots of international pressure)which can turn out to be counter productive for us, since indians will strengthen themselves as more reliable partner in the irani eyes.

3) Then what can happen is that since afghans cant be very much trusted since its the northern alliance mainly in their upper class now and their relations with indians are legendary from Farkhor Air Base - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia in Tajikistan.


4) Now that can iran do? It will them agree with indians to use their territory (either limited use or more) against baluchistan or through afghanistan. Now when we are gain going with Kashmir cause and if God forbid a war brakes out and iran and india somehow sign a defense deal then it will allow indians or maybe iranis to attack in our backyards while we are fighting indians in the east.

Combating Terrorism means Combating Pakistan » Indian Defence Review
Pakistan must not be India’s neighbor » Indian Defence Review who is another radical from the same website.

5) So what should we do? In this case its ideal to maintain a bit of balance with iran as well so they are not pressurized by india to sign some sort of defence deal which will ensure the indians to use pak's backyard while we are busy fighting them in east in a war time scenario. .

You brought up some good points to design a strategy around. Let me answer in order for you:

1) Russian gas deal is an optimal deal for you. (Sadly, being an American, I am saying this, we don't have a direct pipeline to Pakistan so I guess I can favor the Russians here). Whether I like it or not, Russia is the second largest military power. They are no longer a super power, but they are the second largest power and then there is China. I'd even put them in one basket.

So having relationships with TWO second largest powers in the entire globe is NEVER bad. And having billions of trade where they make money too, is icing on the cake. These are two veto votes in the UN, just fyi. Plus dealing with Russians, you'll overcome many issues with regards to the Central Russian estates as they are scared of the Red Bear, and will allow smooth transition of oil and gas. And in turn, Pakistan gets help, investments and advanced weapons, and corners a huge power in his court. Not a bad deal at all.

2) The Central Russian estates that don't like Russia, do like China and some even Pakistan. So you'll be covered from all angles. This is plenty of leverage there. Plus remember, these Central Russian estates all have Chinese influence and they would eventually be linked with China through road and rail links. Which means that they want to use Gawader as its cheaper too. So more business for Pakistan as the silk road develops and becomes operational.

3) After the recent meetings with the Afghans, I won't count them as a factor. They may have good relations with India. But the Afghanistan needs China for infrastructure development and the Chinese need Pakistan's help here. So at the end, Pakistan is very involved within Afghanistan, in a good way. There are shared common agreements now in place to even buy Pakistani weapons and JFT planes, plus training. So things are looking good from that side for both, Afghanistan and Pakistan.

They've agreed to let the Indian influence out of the relationships and thus you see the change in tone. Otherwise, China won't invest in it if the Afghanis keep playing the India part and tick off Pakistan. And Afghanistan will remain a "remote mountainous region" for the next three decades to come. If you want to turn it into civilization.....you'll need the Chinese for the infrastructure and the Pakistanis allowing ports to send goods, machinery and all from Karachi and Gawader. Simple is that.

4) Iran can use their port that they want to build with India. But who are they supplying stuff too? The width of Iran from this port is so big that it'll be super expensive to transport stuff from Iran......plus India doesn't need it as they have ports themselves. They may be able to build a naval base at lease or something but that's it.
Plus, when Pakistan is working with the Russians and the Chinese, the Iran factor almost fades away. Because they are pro-Russians and pro-Chinese. So in case of a conflict, they can get a shush call from either the Chinese or the Russians.

Plus, PAF having -16 block 52, JFT Block II and III's, with potentially SU-37's, why a country the size of Iran or even India want to mess with such strong 4th generation flying force? You can try it, but be ready to lose half the number of your top line jets and that's a pretty expensive proposal for any one. Iran hardly has that conflict ability anymore.

India can use Iran for Baluchistan as Afghanistan will back off of India using their land for this (if it hasn't already, that was the strong message Gen. Raheel had for the Afghanistan leadership that if they don't work well for the Pakistani interests, Pakistan will hot pursuit the terrorist back to Afghanistan). I doubt that Iran will allow India to do so, specially knowing that it might piss off the Russians or the Chinese as terrorists will try to find these foreigners working in Pakistan to target first.

So at the end, the future looks bright for Pakistan. The MAJOR danger is not from the outside right now, it is from the inside, the political unrest in Pakistan can scare away the investors. That needs to be fixed. Plus the current government MUST complete its turn, otherwise you'll lose a lot of advantages I mentioned above as they've brought in a lot of investment because of their relationships. That's what a CFO does in a company.....

Well by "you" i meant pakistan which i believe you represent as a citizen and doesnt need rocket science to understand. There should be gradual increase in defence budget for avoiding negative impact on economy, its investment not lottery that you go and buy a car from showroom.

1) I am not a Pakistani citizen. I just write the truth and sometimes it is not in favor of India or Pakistan. So please quit pigeon holing me. My loyalty is to the Star Spangled Banner you see in my signatures.

3) There is no law that says there have to be gradual increase in any budget. It is their money and they'll use it as they wish to. You and I have nothing to worry about. If they want to spend it all on jets, they will. We don't have a say in it.
 
.
I wish this minister...said "Pakistan to invest significant amount of money in the education dept. to achieve our long term objectives"

Buying SU and F will only uck you up...

You need your work, brains and tears to save yourself.


People of ME, Africa, South Asia, Central Asia, East Asia, Latin America - should understand that these weapons are of no use in the long term...

Your ancestors were weak and SO ARE YOU!
You have wasted 50+ years of your life and have achieved...what?
You are the same ole obese dad that I used to see...

In fact, the computer screen, the computer chip, the light, the chair, your eye glasses, the door bell, your house, the water purification system, kitchen tools, paper etc...who made them?
 
.
latest planes from Russia ? ? ?:blink::blink:
i dont see that coming anytime soon ,,:coffee:
let not scare our newly made friends ... :lol::lol:
Russians will be thinking that we did not even deliver the Mil-35's and they already get our latest fighter planes etc :fie::fie:
Su-35 i guess :undecided:
 
.
But I still doubt it because if we would want to go for another Fighter Jet than we would go for 40 to 60 J-10B as the start than slowly increase the number
yes su35 maintenance is the pain in the *** .... PAF have tested both Su35 and J10 B .. I also doubt that they will go su35 as off now
 
.
yes su35 maintenance is the pain in the *** .... PAF have tested both Su35 and J10 B .. I also doubt that they will go su35 as off now
Not only now they will never go for SU-35 what I can see after ten years is PAF with more than 200 JF-17 Thunder BLOCK II 100 F-16 minimum and there is high possibility of we go for 3 squadrons of J-10 B I mean 52 to 60 Jets and may be even more as for F-16 we currently have 75 if we get the money we my try to go for 40 more F-16 Block 52 I mean new ones from USA but can't say for sure but SU-35 no way hell no
 
.
Back
Top Bottom