What's new

Pakistan Textbooks Acknowledge Role of Minorities

Pakistan's biggest issue is illiteracy. Despite the odds, we have made great advances as compared to our post Independence state of affairs.
Not that I have checked the stats but I guess the illiteracy levels howsoever pathetic would have been same for pak n india ? cause you guys were one landmass before that 1947 ?
 
. .
Partition was never necessary. It was Jinnah's ego all along. There cannot be any other reason. His argument that Muslims cannot live in a Hindu majority India has already been rebutted by the fact that India has more Muslim population than Pakistan and they are doing quite well. Muslims are well represented in Indian society.
And the famous two-nation theory went for a toss when Bangladesh was created.

It's funny, because now Pakistan exists just not to be India.What kind of existence is that ?

Muslims are the bottom worst in India whereas they are rulers in Pakistan, I say we made out like bandits be it as it may that much blood was spilled.

Not that I have checked the stats but I guess the illiteracy levels howsoever pathetic would have been same for pak n india ? cause you guys were one landmass before that 1947 ?

Nope Hindus were more educated when Brits changed the language from Persian nearly overnight all Muslims became illiterate.

The East Pakistanis did not get equality, which is why they created a separate nation for themselves, hence debunking the theory.



With poor comprehension power, comes great responsibilities. The most important among them is not to open your mouth when you don't know head or tail you are talking about.

Yet the Muslims of East Pakistan still did not want to live with you Hindus and chose to remain aprt which means the theory is still properly in place.
 
.
Muslims are the bottom worst in India whereas they are rulers in Pakistan, I say we made out like bandits be it as it may that much blood was spilled.
This argument is full of holes. Are all of you rulers in Pakistan ? There is always one ruler.

Nope Hindus were more educated when Brits changed the language from Persian nearly overnight all Muslims became illiterate.
Am I to believe that all Muslims in India used to communicate in Persian ? No. they spoke the regional languages, just like anybody else.

Yet the Muslims of East Pakistan still did not want to live with you Hindus and chose to remain aprt which means the theory is still properly in place.

The common Muslims didn't even have any idea. The idea was created by handful Muslim elites and supported by some other Muslim feudal lords who saw their interest. That's why you had long standing feudal practices in Pakistan.
 
.
Partition was never necessary. It was Jinnah's ego all along. There cannot be any other reason. His argument that Muslims cannot live in a Hindu majority India has already been rebutted by the fact that India has more Muslim population than Pakistan and they are doing quite well. Muslims are well represented in Indian society.
And the famous two-nation theory went for a toss when Bangladesh was created.

It's funny, because now Pakistan exists just not to be India.What kind of existence is that ?
Muhammad Ali Jinnah was a part of congress in early 1900s.He joined All India Muslim League in 1913, 6-7 years after it was created but also was the part of congress because he wanted United India at first.Mrs Sarojini Naidu even gave him the tittle"The Ambassador Of Hindu-Muslim Unity". But due to Hindu Extremists, he understood that Muslims cannot live with India and so in 1920 left Congress.It wasn't his ego.It were the extremists of congress.

Two Nation Theory did not went to toss. I want to justify my statement but it will be of no use so why waste time.
 
.
Muhammad Ali Jinnah was a part of congress in early 1900s.He joined All India Muslim League in 1913, 6-7 years after it was created but also was the part of congress because he wanted United India at first.Mrs Sarojini Naidu even gave him the tittle"The Ambassador Of Hindu-Muslim Unity". But due to Hindu Extremists, he understood that Muslims cannot live with India and so in 1920 left Congress.It wasn't his ego.It were the extremists of congress.

Two Nation Theory did not went to toss. I want to justify my statement but it will be of no use so why waste time.

why quoting me if you cannot justify your point ?
 
.
why quoting me if you cannot justify your point ?
I gave answer the of "It was Jinnah's ego all along" part.

And the famous two-nation theory went for a toss when Bangladesh was created.
The tragedy of TWO-Nation Theory:
There is no denying the fact that things had happened the worst way possible but this doesn't flop the Two-Nation Theory because:
1. Muslims are spread all over the world but are united in the sense of the word Millat.
2.
In the Ch. Rehmat Ali's Pakistan Scheme(1933), he suggested that north east part of india should become independent homeland and named it 'bangla-i-Islam'.
3. The Lahore Resolution spoke clearly on this matter.It read: "...as in the North-Western and Eastern zones of India,should be grouped to constitute independent states........"
4. Bangladesh even after independence did not gave up its Islamic Identity.It did not join India.
5. Most importantly, Bangladesh consists of Muslims majority in population and has freedom to practice Islam.This was the basis of two-Nation Theory.Bangladesh is not in the hands of Hindu Extremists.Thus, it has conserved the concept of Two-Nation Theory.
 
.
Pakistan's biggest issue is illiteracy. Despite the odds, we have made great advances as compared to our post Independence state of affairs.

Pakistan biggest issue is their Slave Mentality ... we are slaves in our thoughts and Opinions ... even a illiterate person can have moral and Ethics , but in Pakistan well Educated People are far from these two words
 
.
His services to the nation of Pakistan should be part of our national curriculum
2011_turowicz.jpg
 
.
Hi,
IMO youre just as clueless as you said Urdu speakers are.

Like i have said to you many times, reading something on news is quite actually different from reality.

Unless you have experienced reality, you're in no position of commenting on it

The biggest proponents of Pakistan and supporters of the Muslim League were Bengali and Urdu speaking Muslims
If you have evidence to the contrary please present it.

IMO they were clueless, did not care about their community and power hungry. Nothing else explains their actions. I would be glad to tell you so if you care.
 
.
The biggest proponents of Pakistan and supporters of the Muslim League were Bengali and Urdu speaking Muslims
If you have evidence to the contrary please present it.

IMO they were clueless, did not care about their community and power hungry. Nothing else explains their actions. I would be glad to tell you so if you care.
Yes they were and the part they palyed is well recognized, apart from whatever you said is pure bullshit
 
.

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom