What's new

Pakistan tested Oplot... 2015

For benefit of your limited mind, let me recap the main arguments:

1. The mere fact that an aircraft was able to reach within 10 kms of Naliya is no indication of the failure of the Indian air defence network.

2. If, in fact, we were able to evade radars all the way up to within 10 kms of Naliya, we have seriously revealed our capabilities to the enemy, who will now review his air defence in light of our capabilities.

3. The fact that ScanEagle was used now gives the enemy an insight into our preferred tool. He can make deductions on the capabilities, or lack thereof, in our other assets.

4. And finally, your limited brain has limited knowledge as well. The radar signature changes, as the azimuthal angle changes when a distant object gets closer. It even changes based on the aircraft's orientation relative to the radar.

5. And before you try to be smarter than you really are, yes the ScanEagle is a widely known craft and the enemy can get information on it from anywhere, but our job is to make the enemy's job as hard as we can, and not give him free information.

I will count this mission a failure. There is only one set of circumstances where we can call it success: it was our first test run of some advanced capability which we prefer to exercise before actual war, and we have credible intel that the enemy air defence network did indeed fail to detect the aircraft. And this is information that a moron like yourself should never be in possession of.
meaningful post, but lets keep a friendly tone, shall we?
 
.
A well planned air defence network will include automated AA guns for low altitude incursions. There would be a turkey shoot.

Those automated guns work on radar....jam it and the guns are useless.


True but the mistake here is to think that India will just rely on that, they won't. I've already put up a link where pulsed-Doppler radars can easily ID drones at low levels and those made of non-metallic parts.

If they're close to the border....they'll be easily jammed....or come under Arty fire. These radars have short ranges too so if their location is already known, drones can pass through radar gaps, of which there will be plenty.

If those drones are networked...even better.

Example:

 
.
Those automated guns work on radar....jam it and the guns are useless.

Not necessarily. At close ranges both heat signatures and visual clues can be used.
meaningful post, but lets keep a friendly tone, shall we?

My hostility is towards those who are in any way hostile towards Pakistan. He is not doing any good posting what he has been posting.
 
. .
Our own T-80UDs are being upgraded so even if VT4 selected instead of Oplot as a new tank for PA, we are still getting Oplot input into our T-80UD upgrade program.

Ukraine's next gen tank is the T-Rex which is similar to Russian ARMATA PA should look into that level of tech now.
 
Last edited:
.
Our own T-80UDs are being upgraded so even if VT4 selected instead of Oplot as a new tank for PA, we are still getting Oplot input into our T-80UD upgrade program.

Ukraine's next gen tank is the T-Rex which is similar to Russian ARMATA PA should look into that level of tech now.

I thought the upgrade for the T-80 UD was stopped because the costs were to high ?
 
.

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom