What's new

Pakistan says it hasn’t spared any terror group

Might is rite, bully, buy votes, false witnesses, this is the world we live in.
Innocence and truth does not matter.
 
.
The only country in the world who has successfully eliminated rented terrorism, but Pakistan till date continues to fight against US & Indian funded terrorists. The only solutions for Pakistan to deal with this is to seal the border completely, use armed drones to protect the dangerous border & most important deal with the fortress US Embassy which is the main source of terrorism in Pakistan.

But the Irony is almost all of them (read over 99%) are your own citizens. Irrespective of who is using them as alleged, why don't the state introspect to see how an overwhelming number of Pakistani citizens became terrorists and are fighting against the state. :-)
 
. .
Of course not. And if some congressman or senator in the U.S. tried introducing a bill or constitutional amendment forbidding criticism of the military, CIA, or government they would be laughed out of office.
I can't be able to understand the relation between post # 37 & 39, can you explain sir, If you have some extra time???
 
.
But the Irony is almost all of them (read over 99%) are your own citizens. Irrespective of who is using them as alleged, why don't the state introspect to see how an overwhelming number of Pakistani citizens became terrorists and are fighting against the state. :-)
Where'd you get the info that most of them are Pakistani? I would vouch for most of them being Afghan citizens or Afghans masquerading as Pakistanis.
 
.
Where'd you get the info that most of them are Pakistani? I would vouch for most of them being Afghan citizens or Afghans masquerading as Pakistanis.


I don't have enough time to explain to someone who pretends only they are smart and the whole world is full of fools who would easily buy their part of the story without even questioning. The reason why you were not even able to secure the support of at-least 3 Nations in organizations like FATA. :p:

Still if you are patient enough, watch the whole speech from by man in-charge in the following video. I guess you will get a better idea.


Do watch it and please care to explain what he meant by (The Message Of Pakistan) the portion between 8:00 to 8:20 ????
 
Last edited:
.
Would this kind of article be printed in an US newspapers ?
Probably in a Sunday Week in Review (NYT) or Outlook (W. Post) section. Though I'd like to think such interviews wouldn't treat the general with kid gloves. Also, I think it more likely that the entire interview would be published, rather than just selected excerpts - makes one wonder what GN held back and why, doesn't it?

Furthermore, I don't think these multi-page staged interviews of gov't officials happen much anymore: nowadays newspapers prefer foreign governments to pay for their own advertised sections instead! More profit that way, I suppose. China runs its own propaganda section in The Washington Post every few months, it seems.
 
.
I don't have enough time to explain to someone who pretends only they are smart and the whole world is full of fools who would easily buy their part of the story without even questioning.
Self-project much lol? Goes to show how insecure you are about your country and its approach to foreign policy.

The reason why you were not even able to secure the support of at-least 3 Nations in organizations like FATA. :p:
The reason? Do you actually spend some time to think about news or do you just let Modi's propaganda machine dump its excrement into your mouth? Have you forgotten about the power of American influence around the world?
Still if you are patient enough, watch the whole speech from by man in-charge in the following video. I guess you will get a better idea.


Do watch it and please care to explain what he meant by (The Message Of Pakistan) the portion between 8:00 to 8:20 ????
Ah, so you're struggling to understand English. Well it's no biggie, I'll break down what Mr. Bajwa is saying at 8:29 instead of what your media has most likely been repeating all day and making stories from:

Jihad against another country other than that sanctioned by the state is banned according to the message. Even if you were to include the banning of suicide bombings against another country apart from under state sanction, it would come under the declaration of Jihad (or war) against another country. Simple as that. You see, some people like to live their lives along what they see as a religious path so to them, Jihad would be seen as totally righteous regardless of the heinous crimes they commit. This "Message of Pakistan" aims to inform these people that it is not righteous to do so and they can only wage Jihad if the state says so. This way, their minds won't be hijacked by terrorist recruiters wherever they may be, the best example being in Afghanistan by NDS and RAW.

And for your information, I did watch the whole video and all it did was confirm what I said and disprove your claim. Thanks for wasting my time old man.
 
. . . . . .

Military Forum Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom