Pakistan ready for a bilateral nuke non-testing arrangement with India: Sartaj Aziz

[gayMo]

Dont worry about our nukes they were always in safe hands but i really worry about indian nukes i feared that someday radical hindu extrimist terrorist PM of india will someday give indian nukes to Nazi inspired anti Pakistan Terror Org aka RSS.And they chances are more bright that it can happpen in next 2-3 years as saffronis are desperate for Akhand Baharat Aunty

You are trolling out of frustration

You and your retarded logic. Get mature kid. Your logics don't even worth any discussion.

Well most of the civilised thinks that Pka nukes are not safe , just Google the phrase Pak nuke safety and see

 

[neem456]

Yes I know India has a lot of enemies since India is enemy of every country in the region

Good, you learned your lesson quick.
Now dont bother us with that idiotic nuclear arrangement non testing treaty, we are not interested.

 

[gayMo]

Right.

What if Shiv Sena or a similar fundamentalist body comes to power in India? When you point a finger at us, do not forget to check your own house.

Yes, the army is in power in Pak. Shiv send is nothing at a national level. Your statement is a bit extreme in comparison

 

[neem456]

Unfortunately India is Pakistan centric in every aspect. Stop comparing yourself with China.
China is way ahead in every aspect. Come to real world.

Who is comparing anything ?
Develop some comprehensive skills, we are discussing about threat scenarious here, not about dick measurements.

 

[I M Sikander]

But with whom would India sign the treat? With the Nawaz Sharif government, the Pakistan Military, the ISI, or the Terrorist Combine? First let they decide who is running the country. Only then India just might give it a thought.

One more thing Sir i tell u....
Mark my word, whenever they say something good; we get some very horrible things. Then they will back off from what they say now (again unilaterally as if India going to sign it). ha ha

Come don't give us ridiculous comments. It is the Pakistani gov. With whom India has always held talks and dialogues.

Let's see the history.

Nehru vs liaquat ali khan
Nehru vs bogra
Nehra vs ayub Khan
Shastri vs ayub khan
Indra Gandhi vs Bhutto
Indra Gandhi vs Zia
Rajeev Gandhi vs benazir
Vaajpai vs nawaz shareef
Vaajpai vs musharaf
Manmohan vs musharaf
Manmohan vs zardari
Modi vs NS

Its a long history.

 

[neem456]

Right.

What if Shiv Sena or a similar fundamentalist body comes to power in India? When you point a finger at us, do not forget to check your own house.

Such a ignorance on your part.
Shive sena is already in power. In alliance with BJP, in center, in maharashtra, and on alone in mumbai city.

 

[LeGenD]

Such a ignorance on your part.
Shive sena is already in power. In alliance with BJP, in center, in maharashtra, and on alone in mumbai city.

I am aware of relations between PM Modi and Shiv Sena. However, Shiv Sena is not his official front yet.

Anyways, you better control your extremists. We are doing our job.

 

[AKD]

I am aware of relations between PM Modi and Shiv Sena. However, Shiv Sena is not his official front yet.

Anyways, you better control your extremists. We are doing our job.

Extremists??
They don't blow themselves in foreign country or kill kafirs with there AK.they protest using ink or digging a pitch..
So you worry about your extremist's who blows up near a hospital

 

[Great Sachin]

Pakistan ready for a bilateral nuke non-testing arrangement with India: Sartaj Aziz
By ANI

• 
  
  Advisor to Pakistan Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif on Foreign Affairs Sartaj Aziz. |AFP

ISLAMABAD: Pakistan on Friday said it is ready to have a bilateral arrangement with India on a establishing a moratorium on nuclear non-testing.

“We have declared a unilateral moratorium on further testing. Pakistan is prepared to consider translating its unilateral moratorium into a bilateral arrangement on non-testing with India,” the Ministry of Foreign Affairs quoted Pakistan Prime Minister’s Advisor on Foreign Affairs Sartaj Aziz, as saying in a statement.

Aziz briefing media about the Envoys’ Conference held from Aug 1-3, said that Islamabad has consistently supported the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty (CTBT) and voted for the Treaty when it was adopted by the U.N. General Assembly in 1996.

“The issue of NSG membership cannot be separated from the consideration of strategic stability in the region. In 2008, the NSG missed an opportunity to promote simultaneous adherence to non-proliferation benchmarks by Pakistan and India, as a part of a package deal, which would have promoted restraint and stability in the region,” he added.

He also highlighted about Pakistan's formal application for NSG membership which was submitted on May 19, 2016, saying, “We had been preparing for it for quite some time. Our efforts to upgrade our export controls, nuclear safety and security long pre-date our application.”

He said that even prior to the formal filing of NSG application, Pakistan have been undertaking extensive diplomatic efforts to win support for its bid for mainstreaming in the multilateral export control regimes.

“Our strong lobbying efforts have yielded positive results. Our arguments for criteria-based approach, and the impact of any India-specific exemption on the strategic stability in South Asia and on the future of non-proliferation regime, have been accepted by several NSG countries,” he said.

The top diplomat added that Pakistan’s candidacy is based on a desire to strengthen global non-proliferation regimes, the need for strategic stability and level playing field in South Asia, priority for socio-economic development and technological advancement of the country, and capability to supply items on NSG lists Part 1 and 2.

Aziz said Pakistan is confident of the merits of its membership application as its export controls were harmonized with those of the Nuclear Suppliers Group (NSG), Missile Technology Control Regime (MTCR) and Australia Group.

He concluded saying that Pakistan formally invited NSG Troika to visit Islamabad for a detailed briefing on our credentials

http://www.newindianexpress.com/wor...dia-Sartaj-Aziz/2016/08/12/article3576694.ece

Joke of the day

 

[Jai.Singh]

Come don't give us ridiculous comments. It is the Pakistani gov. With whom India has always held talks and dialogues.

Let's see the history.

Nehru vs liaquat ali khan
Nehru vs bogra
Nehra vs ayub Khan
Shastri vs ayub khan
Indra Gandhi vs Bhutto
Indra Gandhi vs Zia
Rajeev Gandhi vs benazir
Vaajpai vs nawaz shareef
Vaajpai vs musharaf
Manmohan vs musharaf
Manmohan vs zardari
Modi vs NS

Its a long history.

This is what am saying my dear.....
GOT ANY RESULT ???????
'Mentos khao dimag ki batti jalao"

Pakistan has spent several decades under military rule (1958 – 1971, 1977 – 1988, 1999 – 2008). Takhta palat

 

[Weldonman211]

I am aware of relations between PM Modi and Shiv Sena. However, Shiv Sena is not his official front yet.

Anyways, you better control your extremists. We are doing our job.

You may be trying but not enough yet!

 

[Jana Assassin]

Dont worry about our nukes they were always in safe hands but i really worry about indian nukes i feared that someday radical hindu extrimist terrorist PM of india will someday give indian nukes to Nazi inspired anti Pakistan Terror Org aka RSS.And they chances are more bright that it can happpen in next 2-3 years as saffronis are desperate for Akhand Baharat Aunty

Dear porki if u cannot understand what is being conversed then please stay out of the discussion instead of calling our country's PM as a terrorist.. India has VOLUNTARILY adopted a policy of No First Use but can you say the same about Pakistan??

 

[Reichsmarschall]

Dear porki if u cannot understand what is being conversed then please stay out of the discussion instead of calling our country's PM as a terrorist.. India has VOLUNTARILY adopted a policy of No First Use but can you say the same about Pakistan??

@waz @Irfan Baloch @WebMaster @Horus Ip ban for this SOB

 

[SamantK]

It was India who took Kashmir issue to UNO in 1948, it was India who took and discussed Kashmir issue in Tashkent accord.

Its the hyprocy on Indian side.

And india also signed the Shimla Accord.

 

[livingdead]

Pakistan's conventional military and nuclear deterrence is India focused, and reactionary to what India does. Pakistan has been willing to negotiate such a thing for a long time, it ball has always been in India's court; Unfortunately, as long as India views China as a rival, and Pakistan as a threat, India will never negotiate; lest we forget, it was India that introduced nukes to the subcontinent.

you said it... India cannot match china in conventional war and need nukes as deterrent... same goes for pakistan wrt India... may be pakistanis can use their good office to influence china to do a deal..
but then china got to deal with USA..