Hustling of the kind being referred to implies a quid pro quo, which in this case could only be that a French refusal to sell to Pakistan would be rewarded by contracts for the Rafale and MICA, which in turn suggests that Indian military acquisition policies are arbitrary and focused on denying Pakistan equipment rather than purchasing the equipment most suited to India's needs.
Would India have rejected the Rafale had France sold Pakistan an avionics suite for the JF-17? No.
Would India have rejected the MICA for her French Mirage fighter jets had France sold Pakistan an avionics suite for the JF-17? No.
Will India walk out of the PAK-FA and further SU-30MKI purchases despite the massive investments made in local production of the latter etc over Russia selling Pakistan military hardware? No, especially because the Rafale acquisition has made clear where India plans to acquire future aircraft from.