Pre emptive strikes with a reason and international support in this matter. and i don't know how would dead indians occupy PAKISTAN for decades. and one thing more.
Nope. Nothing justifies a nuclear strike. You will be called Nazis after that.
Anyway, I gave you a nuke map. Check the nuke map.
ever heard of heat and radiations for 5-6 months when N bomb explodes.
Oh really? Then how do you explain this?
Check from 3:00.
They walked into ground zero the next day. In fact you can start clearing debris and rebuilding damaged buildings from the very next week.
even in conventional war india don't have that big edge it once enjoyed to conquer Pakistan.
The opposite. In 65 we were weaker. In 71 we were stretched between 2 fronts. Today, we have a far superior AF, far superior army and far superior navy. There is no real comparison. In 1987 itself we had achieved teh capability necessary to push very deep into Pakistan.
It is Pakistan's conventional weakness the reason why Pak leaders keep threatening us with nuclear weapons every few weeks. That's why tactical nukes were introduced.
and bombing indian dams in IOK isn't a big issue for us. and i can guarantee you that even half of Pakistan army can defend Pakistan. you need atleast 1:10 numerical advantage in today's world to defeat a strong, fully armed and battle hardened army. and even with this advantage victory is not guaranteed.
Dams are one more target that are illegal to be targeted. But check what will happen if Mangla and Tarbela are destroyed.
You need 3:1 ratio to invade, and we have much more than that.
the three rivers belong to Pakistan under IWT. and we won't end the agreement for new one.
India can make it so that all 6 rivers belong to India. And dude, there are 6 rivers, not 5. Go look at the river map.
When we say "Land of Five Rivers", there is no Indus mentioned.
ever heard the word "scientific progress". you are comparing apples with oranges. today nuclear weapons are 1000 times more powerful than those bombs.
1000 times more powerful is not equal to 1000 times more devastating.
Nuclear bombs were small when they started. Then they became big because the missiles were not accurate. Now they are small again because missiles are accurate.
You don't have even 10% of Russia's arsenal and you are threatening us with a nuclear war?
All you have are a few dozen atom bombs. And you have totally discounted India's ballistic missile defence.
and even with that advantage do you really think you can defeat an army which had over the time transformed into large guerrilla force with more weapons and numirical advantage than any guerrilla force.
If you go nuclear, do you know how much worse our troops will be towards Pakistani targets? We will be killing civilians also in your own cities. Most of Pakjab will be empty. How will you launch guerrilla warfare when there are no civilians to hide amongst? Our troops will be practically killing everything that moves.
You forget that even we have nukes. And you don't have money, or the military strength to fight anymore.
