Pakistan not to accept alteration in Indus Waters Treaty

[AshishDelhi]

Don't know why Pakistanis think that a hydropower project will consume water and there will be less for Pakistan.
Also these projects are much needed for Kashmir.

 

[Qutb-ud-din Aybak]

Don't know why Pakistanis think that a hydropower project will consume water and there will be less for Pakistan.
Also these projects are much needed for Kashmir.

you should give all water from the 2 rivers given to india under IWT to indian occupied kashmir rather than indian occupied khalistan. hope this solve your problem.

In fact, India has more cities than Pak has nukes.

current nuclear weapons don't destroy cities. they destroy whole states with multiple cities.

 

[AshishDelhi]

you should give all water from the 2 rivers given to india under IWT to indian occupied kashmir rather than indian occupied khalistan. hope this solve your problem.


current nuclear weapons don't destroy cities. they destroy whole states with multiple cities.

Currently we are not using our full share of 3 Western rivers. We plan to use that only for improving lives of kashmiri farmers.
Plus all these projects will first and foremost help JK.

 

[war&peace]

Pakistan should also put its demands on the table regarding IWT which heavily Pakistan to counter any such alteration.

 

[Qutb-ud-din Aybak]

Currently we are not using our full share of 3 Western rivers. We plan to use that only for improving lives of kashmiri farmers.
Plus all these projects will first and foremost help JK.

use your share but don't play illegal games as you are trying to play. start controversial projects. gain time. complete them. then say sorry we cannot change them now.
this will drown JK people.

 

[AshishDelhi]

use your share but don't play illegal games as you are trying to play. start controversial projects. gain time. complete them. then say sorry we cannot change them now.
this will drown JK people.

Dams will help avoid or reduce impact of floods like 2-3 years back. Plus more electricity and jobs for Kashmir.
Similarly, irrigation plan is for Kashmir only. We are not planning to irrigate Punjab using those rivers. Plus barrage is specifically for people of valley.
Each and every project will help kashmiris.

 

[Qutb-ud-din Aybak]

Dams will help avoid or reduce impact of floods like 2-3 years back. Plus more electricity and jobs for Kashmir.
Similarly, irrigation plan is for Kashmir only. We are not planning to irrigate Punjab using those rivers. Plus barrage is specifically for people of valley.
Each and every project will help kashmiris.

pakistan is not against any project which follow IWT.

 

[randomradio]

but courts can give you moral victory and justification to use strategic weapons on targets inside india.

Lol. Nothing can give any sort of justification to use nuclear weapons. As someone else said, preemptive nuclear strikes on any country will equate the aggressor to the Nazis forever.

India will be justified to occupy Pakistan for decades.

current treaty gave india 2 complete rivers and small share in pakistani rivers.
isn't it ironic that when you talk about 50-50 you refer to pakistani share only when same could be said about rivers given to india.

Three rivers.
Sure, you can take 50-50. A lot of water flows into Pakistan.

current nuclear weapons don't destroy cities. they destroy whole states with multiple cities.

A bit of common sense will go a long way before you work towards getting knowledge.
Ever heard of Hiroshima?

http://nuclearsecrecy.com/nukemap/

 

[AshishDelhi]

pakistan is not against any project which follow IWT.

So, post IWT did you ever NOT receive you share of water?
We have already built some projects and plan to build more. Not our problem if Pakistani cannot build dams. You are receiving slightly more than you share and more of it flows into ocean. Don't blame others for your incompetence.
Just ask these questions-
1. Is this a biased treaty
2. Did India ever block our water
3. Is our water wasted coz of lack of dams and canals

Ask basic questions and search online. Pakistan unnecessarily blocks all projects.
It says it cares about kashmiris but block projects that arr going to give Kashmir more jobs, more revenue, better infra, safety against floods, better connectivity in winter months, better for tourism, better irrigation etc. Benefit to other Indian states will be minimal and no negative impact to Pakistan. So then why block.

 

[JOEY TRIBIANI]

We will sure bomb the dams .no matter if a war erupted .

 

[Qutb-ud-din Aybak]

So, post IWT did you ever NOT receive you share of water?
We have already built some projects and plan to build more. Not our problem if Pakistani cannot build dams. You are receiving slightly more than you share and more of it flows into ocean. Don't blame others for your incompetence.
Just ask these questions-
1. Is this a biased treaty
2. Did India ever block our water
3. Is our water wasted coz of lack of dams and canals

Ask basic questions and search online. Pakistan unnecessarily blocks all projects.
It says it cares about kashmiris but block projects that arr going to give Kashmir more jobs, more revenue, better infra, safety against floods, better connectivity in winter months, better for tourism, better irrigation etc. Benefit to other Indian states will be minimal and no negative impact to Pakistan. So then why block.

1. no this treaty is not biased. India also got 2 rivers out of 5. and some share in other 3 rivers. Now many indians still want 50 percent share in pakistani share of water and at the same time don't want to talk about other 2 rivers which india got under IWT.
2.secondly yes india created water problems and floodings before IWT. the first was done in 1948 when india demanded pakistan to rejoin with india for water.
3.it's not our water. it's pakistani share. your concern should only be your share.

 

[Dzz]

its not in their hands to agree or disagree , we will build all the dams we want and direct water to our citizens needs as our natural birth right to do so

We will sure bomb the dams .no matter if a war erupted .

good luck with the flash floods and a full scale retaliation of a military 4x the size of yours

 

[Qutb-ud-din Aybak]

Lol. Nothing can give any sort of justification to use nuclear weapons. As someone else said, preemptive nuclear strikes on any country will equate the aggressor to the Nazis forever.

India will be justified to occupy Pakistan for decades.



Three rivers.
Sure, you can take 50-50. A lot of water flows into Pakistan.



A bit of common sense will go a long way before you work towards getting knowledge.
Ever heard of Hiroshima?

http://nuclearsecrecy.com/nukemap/

Pre emptive strikes with a reason and international support in this matter. and i don't know how would dead indians occupy PAKISTAN for decades. and one thing more. ever heard of heat and radiations for 5-6 months when N bomb explodes.

even in conventional war india don't have that big edge it once enjoyed to conquer Pakistan. and bombing indian dams in IOK isn't a big issue for us. and i can guarantee you that even half of Pakistan army can defend Pakistan. you need atleast 1:10 numerical advantage in today's world to defeat a strong, fully armed and battle hardened army. and even with this advantage victory is not guaranteed.

the three rivers belong to Pakistan under IWT. and we won't end the agreement for new one.

ever heard the word "scientific progress". you are comparing apples with oranges. today nuclear weapons are 1000 times more powerful than those bombs.

its not in their hands to agree or disagree , we will build all the dams we want and direct water to our citizens needs as our natural birth right to do so


good luck with the flash floods and a full scale retaliation of a military 4x the size of yours

4x military advantage. it's 2016 wake up.
and even with that advantage do you really think you can defeat an army which had over the time transformed into large guerrilla force with more weapons and numirical advantage than any guerrilla force.

 

[PAKISTANFOREVER]

its not in their hands to agree or disagree , we will build all the dams we want and direct water to our citizens needs as our natural birth right to do so


good luck with the flash floods and a full scale retaliation of a military 4x the size of yours

indians are not going to do anything. You're all talk. Bluster on the net by indians is not going to change that fact. Just like indians were powerless to attack Pakistan after mumbai 2008 even though india is at least 7x bigger than Pakistan and has abundant access to the world's most advanced weapons systems whilst we are denied this privilege.

In the highly unlikely event india does do something than please come and talk. Otherwise keep dreaming. Barking dogs seldom bite.

 

[Dzz]

4x military advantage. it's 2016 wake up.
and even with that advantage do you really think you can defeat an army which had over the time transformed into large guerrilla force with more weapons and numirical advantage than any guerrilla force.

i don't want to make this into off-topic debate, i believe a all out war is something pak military can compete with. you may have your opinions but , but i'll go be ex-president musharraf words who literally said pakistan needs nuke since it faces a "existential crisis" from a conventional war with india

indians are not going to do anything. You're all talk. Bluster on the net by indians is not going to change that fact. Just like indians were powerless to attack Pakistan after mumbai 2008 even though india is at least 7x bigger than Pakistan and has abundant access to the world's most advanced weapons systems whilst we are denied this privilege.

In the highly unlikely event india does do something than please come and talk. Otherwise keep dreaming. Barking dogs seldom bite.

that's a nice story and all but the ground reality is we already started building the dams.


http://www.dawn.com/news/1286433