Pakistan must rehabilitate the displaced from Kargil War

[masterchief_mirza]

@Joe Shearer



I do not know if you are talking about me when you said this, but I did check the number of 400 - 4000.
On the Wikipedia page of the Kargil War (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kargil_War) you can see the casualties from both sides (see part of screenshot below).

View attachment 657622

As you can see is that the numbers of casualties at the Pakistani side range from 357 - 4000 (with sources to back them up) which shows that the range given in the article from 400 - 4000 does not differ that much. Maybe the writer of the article used Wikipedia for the number of casualties.

Also the number of Indian casualties are listed as 527 above which roughly corresponds with the 500 given in the article. However Musharraf claimed that there were 1600 Indian deaths. So, it would have been more honest of the writer (if he is aware of these numbers) to write the number of Indian deaths in the range of 500 - 1600.
That I agree with.


@Pakistan Ka Beta



This is the first time I posted an article from this site, so I do not know what their agenda is.


@masterchief_mirza



The article was written by a Pakistani.
How can this be Indian chanakya?
Or is anyone who criticises the Pakistani army a traitor?



I post articles about everything.
So, how can that be selection bias?



Well, (for the thousandth time) I was born in Paramaribo, Suriname. I am a Surinamese Hindustani. I am a descendant of British Indian contract labourers who where brought to Suriname to work on the fields there.
And I am currently living in the Netherlands (of which Suriname was a colony until 1975, the year of independence).



You do realise that this is forum and not a scientific journal?
And I have no conflict of interest.



I did choose the Surinamese flag, but that is not visible.
I do not think that the Surinamese flag is made and available on PDF.
The flag of the Netherlands however is, as you can see.



I have placed something about my nationality in my signature.
Especially for you.

P.S.
If you have something to say, do not talk about me, but talk to me.

Your thread therefore you automatically get alerted whenever there's a post, unless you have me on ignore.

 

[masterchief_mirza]

Thanks for adding your identification to your signature. I appreciate it.

 

[Kailash Kumar]

@masterchief_mirza

Oh dear. You're really implying that Pakistanis cannot work for the Indian agenda?? That's not even an argument.

I am not implying that.
But do you think that no one can criticise the Pakistani Armed Forces?
Is every critic working for the Indian agenda?
Is none of the criticism valid?

Your thread therefore you automatically get alerted whenever there's a post, unless you have me on ignore.

But what are tags for then?
And I do not have you on ignore by the way.
(I have no member on ignore).

Thanks for adding your identification to your signature. I appreciate it.

No problem.

 

[masterchief_mirza]

@masterchief_mirza



I am not implying that.
But do you think that no one can criticise the Pakistani Armed Forces?
Is every critic working for the Indian agenda?
Is none of the criticism valid?



But what are tags for then?
And I do not have you on ignore by the way.
(I have no member on ignore).



No problem.

Sir, I will tag you on other threads but on your home thread, you're automatically alerted on your notification list whenever there's a comment. If that is insufficient notification, I shall try to explicitly tag you in future.

As for criticising the armed forces of Pakistan, I also criticise them for example when they don't shoot enough Indians. Clearly, my criticism is not Delhi-centric. Each criticism must be judged case by case. That's all there is to it.

 

[Kailash Kumar]

Sir, I will tag you on other threads but on your home thread, you're automatically alerted on your notification list whenever there's a comment. If that is insufficient notification, I shall try to explicitly tag you in future.

I know that when you reply that I get a notification.
But it was not so much the tags itself, but more that you referred to me in third person.
That was what I was trying to say.
You could have addressed me directly, with or without tag (like I did here).

As for criticising the armed forces of Pakistan, I also criticise them for example when they don't shoot enough Indians. Clearly, my criticism is not Delhi-centric. Each criticism must be judged case by case. That's all there is to it.

Ok. Fair enough.

 

[Trango Towers]

4000? Might as well make it 10,000 for a nice, round number.

40000 goes with 4

Indians dont just pass wind the stink the continent out