What's new

Pakistan militants 'world threat' says India

.
so let me get this straight:
India believes that terrorists have no religion but they do have a nationality???
BULLSH!T
 
.
And who would be these "others"..?
Please do elaborate.

There are countless books, analysis', comments by heads of states and government officials making references to the danger the militancy and terrorism arising out of Pakistan poses to the world at large. People didn't just wake up one day and decided to refer to Pakistan as the hub of terrorism or international migraine or what have you.

This is a long standing chronic problem mired in a barrage of complexities. Nothing that is being said now is "new" by any means, it's just getting more press coverage on account of the gory attack on Mumbai.
 
.
Exactly, without the Bengalis' support India could never win.

Ghabarao mat bhai...
AApka credit aap hi ka hai...

The point is without Bengal's massacres India would have nothing to fight for.
INdia did act in its own interest(whatever they are and how far ever reaching consequences they are to have, in other words, be it the immigrants problem or possibly the grand strategy of security). I quote someone here "There are no free lunches in international polity." and Have whatever you got and don't cry about others.

If you want to be friends with Pakistan fine go ahead.
If you want to forget the reasons for which your country emerged, that too fine... your problem.

But think about this, what would have become of Bengal(both East Bengal and the Indian region ocupied by immigrants) without Indian intervention?
And also this...
COuld it be possible that Bangladesh formed without India's help?:tsk:
 
.
There are countless books, analysis', comments by heads of states and government officials making references to the danger the militancy and terrorism arising out of Pakistan poses to the world at large. People didn't just wake up one day and decided to refer to Pakistan as the hub of terrorism or international migraine or what have you.

This is a long standing chronic problem mired in a barrage of complexities. Nothing that is being said now is "new" by any means, it's just getting more press coverage on account of the gory attack on Mumbai.

I do believe people have waken up one day and decided to refer to Pakistan.
Why is that? Well not too long ago, Iraq and Afghanistan were the epicentre of terrorism, Pakistan wasn't even in the picture back then.
These countries are simply being labeled by the U.S. as nations who harbor terrorists, once the U.S. says this, the rest of the world follows, and especially (western)Europe.
It's easy to point fingers at Pakistan, but first look at how this militancy has risen, it's most definitely due to Americas interference in the muslim world, the lack of respect shown towards these orthodox muslims, events which have taken place, decisions that have been made, you can go on and on, it's quite complicated but still, i'm not justifying any action from any terrorist who harms innocent people, people should look at the root of the problem, and it's very unfair to push Pakistan and blame Pakistan for everything while infact the western world also has its share in this.
 
.
Americas interference in the muslim world, the lack of respect shown towards these orthodox muslims, events which have taken place, decisions that have been made, you can go on and on, it's quite complicated but still

Mr. Jihad,

You are right that things have become more complicated, but the question of American interference in muslim world was not exclusive decisions. It was an inclusive decisions, for example when Iraq invaded kuwait, Kuwait had a chances of calling other muslims countries for help, Why US?

Then when US does help, there where other orthodox muslims like Osama, calls American Devil, simply because they put there foot in Middle eastern muslims countries.

If you want Americans to be out of any muslims countries stop reling on Americans. If you have need for military hardware find a way to make your own instead of buying from America. If you need to start even a oil industries, do not call american companies from pumping to refinning.
 
Last edited:
.
lolz, Mukharjee is just blabbering BS. The Indian people know that Bangladesh on the North East Indian side is more of a threat than Pakistan. Bangladeshis are infiltrating everyday on Indian land and settling down on Assam without much resistance. Mukharjee is just pointing fingers without much research.

That is exactly the reason why Bangladesh will never go out of Indian envelope. The fact that a good portion of your nation will sink and a decent portion of your agri land will become saline does not help your case much. We receive a lot of buffons from your gopvernment seeking Indian assistance in tackling climate change starting from your Climate advisoy, GIS photogramettry and data, Gene markers for Mnagroves to build coastal bio sjhield so that the next time storm surge occurs a good portion of your populace will not vanish. Ever wondered in all booming Asia the investment received by BD is puny even compared to Pakistan despite you nations sewat shops. BD needs India, Indian assistance, knowhow(From bio tech to satellite imagery) to survive climate change and already high level teams from your good ol nation are visitning India.

Guess Pakistan can deliver to you what we can deliver. My be during the next storm surge Pakistan will build you bio shields and will provide you satellite imagery. Next time one of you guys visits us I shall remember all you had said
 
. .
if anything happens anywhere in world especially bombing they must've come from Pakistan ? i dont get it all the wester media and India media jump to the conculsion so fast....
 
. .
Mr. Jihad,

You are right that things have become more complicated, but the question of American interference in muslim world was not exclusive decisions. It was an inclusive decisions, for example when Iraq invaded kuwait, Kuwait had a chances of calling other muslims countries for help, Why US?


Who actually on the first place give the go signal to Saddam ? Of course the US, they were the ones who made him a power in the Gulf and to further their own foot hold in M.E. they allowed the action of Saddam.

Then when US does help, there where other orthodox muslims like Osama, calls American Devil, simply because they put there foot in Middle eastern muslims countries.


The point here .. who created OBL ? Who taught him the art of terrorism ? Of course CIA .. now after use they left him out to rot ! Why don't you see how more terrorist all the Guanto captives are becoming. Neatry Everyone which has returned from the US jail in Cuba are much more spewing hatred and seeking bloodshed ! Any reason why ?

If you want Americans to be out of any muslims countries stop reling on Americans. If you have need for military hardware find a way to make your own instead of buying from America. If you need to start even a oil industries, do not call american companies from pumping to refinning.

It was the US which fanned the extremism in the Muslim world to achieve it's goal i.e; destruction of USSR as USA by itself was too afraid of the mighty USSR. No wonder it supplied ex-Egyptian / Pla Russian equipment to the Afghan Mujhaideen in the first at least 3 - 5 years of the conflict.

Hence, now that USSR is gone USA should support the rehabilitation of the maniacs by making ROZ / Free trade zones & get equal employment regimes so that extremism is removed from this lot .. but what USA gives back ... Guantanamobay jail, carpet bombing & daisy cutters ! Sure you will get stability in the region !
 
.
must7 kinda summed it up for me.
The American foreign policy over the last decade(s) has played a huge role in the awakening of this extremism, but right now, the U.S. and Europe do not look at that role, they're just saying: Terrorism is right here and right now, and we oughta take care of it and blame the countries who are "harboring" them.
Everything has a past, and so does extremism.
There's a difference between economic co-operation and political co-operation.
The American think tanks obviously knew exactly what to do and how to manipulate certain parties so their interests were safe and secure in the Middle East.
I've always said that Israel was an extension of the American foreign policy and dominance.
They always have to intervene in the Middle East, and not for trade or economic deals, but mostly for securing the oil and getting a strong grip so that Israel has no trouble and gets to do whatever it wants.
 
.
Jihad : Watch the movie Syriana (George Clooney)! Very disheartening but literally covering the issue.

Believe me you will realise that truth is there but nobody dares present it officially to the US !
 
.
Jihad : Watch the movie Syriana (George Clooney)! Very disheartening but literally covering the issue.

Believe me you will realise that truth is there but nobody dares present it officially to the US !

I've heard about this movie, haven't watched it though, I might now, thanks for the heads up!
 
.
Mr. Jihad,

You are right that things have become more complicated, but the question of American interference in muslim world was not exclusive decisions. It was an inclusive decisions, for example when Iraq invaded kuwait, Kuwait had a chances of calling other muslims countries for help, Why US?

Then when US does help, there where other orthodox muslims like Osama, calls American Devil, simply because they put there foot in Middle eastern muslims countries.

If you want Americans to be out of any muslims countries stop reling on Americans. If you have need for military hardware find a way to make your own instead of buying from America. If you need to start even a oil industries, do not call american companies from pumping to refinning.




That was a bad Decision by Saudis to bring America In when Saddam Invaded Kuwait ..

If Saudia Arabia Called only Once for help to Muslim nations , Millions of Mujahidin Came in no time & remove Saddam from Power ...
 
.

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom