What's new

Pakistan is India's part: Mohan Bhagwat

Ehhhh....in all maps Ghazwa-e-Pakistan only happening....1971, then Siachen etc.
In kargil war our army had captured lots of strategically important areas, plz shed some light on it too.
And as for 1971, what did you gained from it? you guys ended up getting another Pakistan from your eastern side which is now becoming headache for you indian.
And Mate also read some history, and also observe how many pieces did this akhrand baharat thingy has been broken into. And is still under disintegration mode....
 
.
And what do you think about secular Ghazwa-e-hind.:azn:???

Ok lets put jokes aside, the matter of fact is Akhrand baharat is THE AKHRAND BAHARAT whether its secular or islamic.

And as for the ghaza e hind, its basically an on going process, it wont gonna happen over night. Just look how many maps has been carved out in subcontinent in past. And no body exactly knows how many new countries will gonna be formed out of the left over of this so called akhrand baharat.
there wont be any new country. because we Indians are extreme nationalists. we only think of our nation first. for us nothing is more important than our nation not even religion.

but that can not be said for pakistanis and BD. for pakistani and BD people Islam is first priority. nation is secondary thing for them. so there are more chances of pakistan and BD getting disintegrated.
 
.
In kargil war our army had captured lots of strategically important areas, plz shed some light on it too.
And as for 1971, what did you gained from it? you guys ended up getting another Pakistan from your eastern side which is now becoming headache for you indian.
And Mate also read some history, and also observe how many pieces did this akhrand baharat thingy has been broken into. And is still under disintegration mode....

What 'strategic areas' did you say you captured? Your guys went up there, there was no supply line to support them, your generals abandoned them when Indian shelling began. I'm sure in your terminology leaving your soldiers to slaughter and even refusing to collect their bodies is called 'capture'. 1971 we didn't want territory, and yes Bangladesh is NOT a headache for India. Your country is overrun by Tableban and violence- they are stable and growing, there is peace on our east because we cut off your influence there for good. Terrorists don't come into Kolkatta with AK 47 on a killing spree from Bangladesh like your people did in Mumbai. Your version of silly history---sorry I don't need to read that.
 
.
So u generally don't get involved in religious discussions but you had to on this one cos it was about your own religion, it's like saying you are not a paedophile but you want to marry young girls. .

You, sir, have very weird fantasies.

I sincerely hope, you actually do not believe in that BS, you just wrote here.
 
.
. .
You, sir, have very weird fantasies.

I sincerely hope, you actually do not believe in that BS, you just wrote here.
Its not my fantasy my friend , but I am just quoting what I read on social forums... and YES its SICK!!! uugghhh!!
 
. . .
if your brotherhood is so much oozing out of your pores, please suggest the new country to be called

"Greater Pakistan".
I'll see how many 'brothers" will jump on this and agree.
Which will be controlled by us Evil Yindoos from Delhi with me as the supreme ruler... So let 's create greater Pakistan
 
Last edited:
.
@Pakistani shaheens

The issue is not about India (btw its Akhand Bharat ..... there is no r in there) disintegrating.

The issue is that Pakistan is a an unnatural, artificial and a forced construct. Which would disintegrate further before a stable natural equilibrium is achieved.

The first step toward that was Bangladesh. There was zero connect between the Bengalis and the Punjabis.

The next is what we are seeing in terms of the turmoil in Pakistan over the past decade, gradually going worse. Point of fact of the matter being that there is absolutely no connect between the Punjabi and the Pashtun. Or indeed the Punjabi and the Baloch.

The Pashtun belt is naturally and historically and genetically (and dare I say spiritually) aligned with the Afghans, the cusp state between the Indian and the Persian civilizations. While the Baloch are almost wholly Iranic and have zero connect with the Indic Punjabi.

Bottom line is that when you separated from us, what you took with you that was naturally ours (both of us together) ended at the eastern banks of the Indus.

From the western bank and beyond was never really yours. And the equilibrium is in the process of being found.
 
. .
Misleading title. He said Pak, BD was once a part of India. That is history and everyone knows it.
I guess all countries that don't have Hindus must not be in peace?
Hindutva logic.....

Then again you wont find any country in the world with no hindus.
 
.
@Pakistani shaheens
The issue is not about India (btw its Akhand Bharat ..... there is no r in there) disintegrating.
The issue is that Pakistan is a an unnatural, artificial and a forced construct. Which would disintegrate further before a stable natural equilibrium is achieved.
@doppelganger you are right dear! the real issue is not india but its INDIANS. That is because they are always in grief of what happened on 1947. Their souls and mind dont wander beyond that date. (Plz dont take it in negative meaning, i didnt meant to offend anyone instead im showing a reality and a mirror to you guys, this is how you guys think!). And another bad thing about indians is that they are all under inferiority complex. They dont appreciate what they have instead they always claim everything to be theirs which has unfortunately has became their hobby.

And as far as Pakistan is concerned, you can say what ever you want it dosnt matter. Pakistan is the reality which is indijestible by you indians. When Pakistan got its independence many people predicted that it wont gonna last long, it will come down like a house made of cards. But look we are here! Pakistan is mashallah here in this world. And will remain till end of this world, insha Allah.

And you are also saying that Pakistan is unnatural country! it again doent matter what you indians thinks about our country and i also dont mind what you said, its natural for you guys to say this because you guys are our arch rival. If we dont expect such words from our arch rivals then to whom we gonna listen these words from? And plz care to tell me if Pakistan is unnatural country then what do you think about India? The matter of fact is india is itself an unnatural country which was created by british, even its name was introduced by british! And india was made from many nationalities you should also not forget that. And it will be a matter of time when you will see many many new maps will arise from this multi ethnic artificial country.



@Pakistani shaheens
The first step toward that was Bangladesh. There was zero connect between the Bengalis and the Punjabis.
Yes i know bangladesh detached from us on 1971 but did they joined india? Did they said that they wants to make akhrand baharat?

And secondly you thinks there was no contact between bengalis and panjabis, they were different from eachother...OK fine!!
But can you also tell me how is it possible if bengalis and panjabis are same under akhrand baharat but not same under Pakistan?
I mean if (A) = (B) and (B) = (C) then it also means (A) is also equals to (C). I mean to say that how can panjabis and bangalis can be equal under akhrand baharat but cant be equal under Pakistan? The matter of fact is the word akhrand baharat it self is artificial and exist in fantasy world of bollywood and has nothing to do with reality.


@Pakistani shaheens
The next is what we are seeing in terms of the turmoil in Pakistan over the past decade, gradually going worse.
Yes thanks for reminding that to us! and by the way your raw is doing pretty great job in afghanistan, they are real akhrand baharat warriors. You should be proud of their acheivement, the way they helped creating Bangladesh and the way they prevailed this turmoil in Pakistan via afghanistan is just mind blowing. You guys should give them some award. They are really working for the cause of akhrand Baharat.





@Pakistani shaheens
Point of fact of the matter being that there is absolutely no connect between the Punjabi and the Pashtun. Or indeed the Punjabi and the Baloch.
LOL!! sir can i ask you a simple question? have you ever been to Pakistan? I think you havent been to Pakistan because your post can really tell this. And by the way do you know how many Pakthuns are there in Karachi and in Lahore or in other parts of Pakistan? Even my neighbors are Pakthuns. Pakthuns are everywhere in Pakistan. Your assumtion that there is no contact between Pakthuns and Panjabis is just baseless. And by the way can you count how many Pakthuns are there in Pakistan cricket team? Coming down to Panjabi and balochi, my dear you are again spreading non sense. If you visit queeta or anyother part of balochistan province you will see all types of Pakistanis over there especially Panjabis. And in my very own class i have two friends who are baloch! one is from quetta and other one is from Lasbella. And i remember in school i had a friend he was also baloch, he was from dummar tribe. Even in this forum you will encounter lots of baloch. And more over our respected COAS is also baloch.


@Pakistani shaheens
The Pashtun belt is naturally and historically and genetically (and dare I say spiritually) aligned with the Afghans, the cusp state between the Indian and the Persian civilizations. While the Baloch are almost wholly Iranic and have zero connect with the Indic Punjabi.
Pakthuns are more similar to Pakistanis than afghans. Even if we have any similarities with afghans then its beacuse of the fact that they are our neighbours and plus we were one country under Durrani and other empires. And secondly there is a hell of a difference between Pakthuns and afghans. Their food, customs and even language everything is different. And historically speaking as i said earlier Pakistan and afghanistan were united under many empires in past, so we have abit of same history, If you dont believe me then ask any Pakthun member here on PDF they will clear your misconception. And coming down to genetics! do you know all types of Pakistanis(Pakthuns,Sindhis,Balochis etc) have same genes! and i think you are also aware of fact that indians also have distinct genes from Pakistanis. And lastly you have stated that baloch are iranic! mate you have no idea what are you talking about! Baloch people originated from mehargarh, if you dont believe me then you can check this on net. The bottom line is these baloch are Pakistani and their contribution to our independence is countless, if british didnt managed to rule this area then that doent mean its not our part or its iranic, no matter how many times you can say, you cant change this fact.



@Pakistani shaheens
Bottom line is that when you separated from us, what you took with you that was naturally ours (both of us together) ended at the eastern banks of the Indus. From the western bank and beyond was never really yours. And the equilibrium is in the process of being found..
Whats yours or whats not always varies from one indian to other. Some indians say that this Akhrand baharat ranges from afghanistan to indonesia. Some passionate safronic chaddies have made claims china is also part of akhrand baharat. And some phunny people have even said that australians were indians. LOL...but the matter of fact is such things are nothing but a rubbish and also there was no such thing as india before british came here. You guys have no right to claim over others land. Your own land which you guys claim is not even yours.
 
. .
Back
Top Bottom