What's new

Pakistan has more Nukes than India.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Ok then tell me which Indian missile is inducted in Indian army apart of prithivi and agni 1? Where is nag atgm? Where is Akash SAM? Where is Agni 2? 3? Dhanush? Sagrika? Just look at the fact, how much your government spend on indigenous missile manufacturing, for how many decades and still being tested? Even your SLV continued Indian legacy of CRASHES ! When you boast high and high about Indian pride than you must also possess the courage to admit your failures. The fact is India spends billions and billions on indigenous products and still end up in failures which result in imports. LCA, Arjun are just two examples. More to follow

Ballistic Missiles inducted:
prithvi1,prithvi2,prithvi3
danush,agni1,agni2
akash sam-induction started for the order of 2000 systems
NAG ATGM-3rd generation fire and forget system with imaging seeker-All trials successfully completed and ordered huge number by indian army and two other countries.
SLV-have more than 95%success rate,have launched satellites of 8-10 other nations,also holds the world record of placing 10 satellites in orbit in a single launch.
Other projects successfully tested and awaiting induction:
Agni 3-third successfull test completed,induction will start this year.
AAD And PAD-4 th country to successfully test ballistic missile shield,4th successful test was last week and awaiting induction .
Shourya hyper sonic hybrid- cruise missile.
Astra bvr aam-3rd successfull test completed
kl-15 sagarika-successfully tested 9 times and will be inducted in arihant class nuclear submarines.
I dont want to start a d*k measuring contest but just answering your queries.
 
.
India can do nothing to Pakistan. The last major battle was a daring Pakistani assault , and we didn't even officially have nukes then unlike you guys. Still a few thousand men gave the entire Indian military an uphill battle. Now the nuclear equation completely nullifies any Indian threat.

If the last major battle was a daring pak assault, then why was ur govt denying the fact of participation of ur army in the early days of battle. Leave it, on the equation of nukes, boosting on the nukes is insane because if you use it, there will be a retaliation and then may be people here will not be able to write any post after that. Its insane to put ur own home at risk and assault somebody who is more powerul and capable. Be realistic and live happily with your family.
 
. .
Now I am confused whether I should laugh or bang my head in the wall..My dear fellow the mujaheddin is nothing but the creation of ISI with US help.It was originally done to counter the Soviet Forces in Afghanistan.After the Soviet Forces exited, and USSR came down,the Americans did not bother about them any more(A perfect example of Use and Throw policy).But the mujaheddin remained in Afghanistan and so did their training facilities,lots of arms and ammunition,a country at a mesh and the ISI connections.It is these very mujaheddin who transformed into Taliban.

Now,the Taliban were none of US business.But things changed after the 9/11 attacks and suddenly they became enemies of the US.Pakistan helped in the US fight against them thus enraging the Taliban as they perceived this as backstabbing.It is now the remnants of those very mujaheddin who are creating trouble in Pakistan.

Oh well, that was a very short and quick description.You don't need to refer to religious texts to know who they are.Referring to the recent history of the 80s and 90s will do...It is better to call a spade a spade.

Okay lets believe what u said above then..the case is what India gonna do if they started marching towards Kashmir or whole of the India after takng over Afghanistan?:woot::cheesy: cuz accordng to my info they r getting ready for that.:woot:
but dont worry we gnna help u guyz...u can take refuge here with us...
:pakistan::pdf:
 
Last edited:
.
Agree with you bro...Lets make Asia is better place for all to live at :cheers:

not untill the Kashmiris or other regional issues are solved ..bros
:woot::cheesy:
This is possible that nobody survives in this world if no justice is performed on the true humanitarian base.:woot::lol:
 
.
Kuch samajh aaya tha mai kya khena chata hoo..??


Matlab ye hua ki, : That there are still chances that you people will become civilized???:lol:


Lot of hope guyz...too many chances....but u gotta work hard for it...maybe u gotta sacrifice ure lives for it too:woot::lol:...
 
.
Pakistanis are frustrated to loosing to INDIA in each and every major field since Independence now after 60+ Shameful years. They are starting to find Happiness in little things like this Assumed Nuke data.

What Pakis are Celebrating..

Whoa hah...this Assumed Nuke data states that we have 10 more nukes then India!! Yippe...(Although we know that 15 would be sufficient but we have built a habit of eating grass so we'll continue to..make more)

What Indians are celebrating..

Indian Economy reaching 2 trillion level with in 2 1/2 years
The Launch Of CARTOSAT-2B
Indian Flag On Moon(Chandrayaan)
35$ Laptop with a touch screen 2 gigabytes of ram wifi connectivity and usb ports
TATA NANO
Nuclear Submarine..will be Submarines soon ;-) u knw it
Upcoming Home Made Aircraft Carriers
Stealth Destroyers
.
.
 
.
not untill the Kashmiris or other regional issues are solved ..bros
:woot::cheesy:
This is possible that nobody survives in this world if no justice is performed on the true humanitarian base.:woot::lol:
You keep raising the "Kashmir issue" and we'd keep procrastinating it. The ultimate loser in this case will be you. If you cannot move on, we cannot help it.
 
.
funny-kid-tells-joke-to-dog.jpg


Haha - the only operational injun missile is the prithvi, which is an obsolete joke, I mean it is nothing more than a glorified V2, a Scud is more advanced.

Per capita - india today is one of the poorest nations on earth, living conditions for a significant proportion of her people, is worse than sub-saharan Africa.

Hundreds of millions starve, that is why there is a raging Naxalite insurgency that controls 40% of india. These people are gaining recruits because of the poverty.

Thats the reality :( sorry to burst your bubble
 
Last edited:
.
what a foolish post just check facts and dnt embarrass your self

Arjun is much more capable than any of your current MBT.
And about LCA IAF dnt want to induct uncompleted project ... just you did with jf17 cause we all know about your current jf17 .... even mig21 biscon is superior as compare to your current jf17

And which SLV test your are talking about ????

we dnt hide our failure.... like you do ... we have guts to accept that ... where is your gauri3 ..... 10 years no test or 100 failure


for people like you, this world is a little more than BOLLYWOOD fantasy:P

SLV failure

Disappointment. India's GSLV D3 mission fails

Mighty Arjun

orbat.com/site/weapons/2004/arjun.pdf

Missile failure

Asia Times Online :: South Asia news - India exposed by missile failure

thedawn.com.pk/2010/03/15/failure-delhis-anti-missile-system-fails/

There is no such thing as Gauri 3 or Tipu. Only Shaheen 3 is ready and will be tested when needed. We do not have a habit of boasting and show off unlike you people.

Please let me know if you want more....:)
 
.
Add the DUD report to above.....

 
Last edited by a moderator:
.
Forgive me for not reading the entire thread, but I've seen so many like it. "There are enough nukes in the world to put us back 10,000 years." or "Civilization can be wiped out 100X over by the nuclear inventory." This is incorrect on so many levels...

The only ones who I'd say truly understand are are military men and scientists who spent decades during the cold war calculating the destruction and targeting of the opposition. There are a few web sites that can describe it in a simple way:

How I Learnt To Stop Worrying And Love The Bomb (Kinda)

but most simply spout the mantra "We are all going to die 50 times." The reality is that a handful of nukes cannot destroy a country, and the entire world stockpile cannot destroy mankind. Not even close.

Will it be horrific? Absolutely. Millions upon millions of dead. Can we destroy civilization? No.

The men who targeted Moscow and Washington in the 1950's had dozens of hi-yield thermonuclear warheads pointed at each city. Dozens. Not one, or two. To describe the "why" of this is beyond the scope of a quick post in a public forum, but the reasons dozens are needed is varied. And that's one city. Now, you've got to do the same for dozens if not hundreds of important cities and military bases.

The U.S. and the USSR did not build their gigantic stockpiles for bragging rights. Nukes are expensive to create and maintain. They built them because if the name of the game was thermonuclear war, that large quantity was necessary to ensure 100% target destruction.

I suspect this is coming off badly, but the essence is that nukes are hugely overrated in terms of destructive power.
 
.
Forgive me for not reading the entire thread, but I've seen so many like it. "There are enough nukes in the world to put us back 10,000 years." or "Civilization can be wiped out 100X over by the nuclear inventory." This is incorrect on so many levels...

The only ones who I'd say truly understand are are military men and scientists who spent decades during the cold war calculating the destruction and targeting of the opposition. There are a few web sites that can describe it in a simple way:

How I Learnt To Stop Worrying And Love The Bomb (Kinda)

but most simply spout the mantra "We are all going to die 50 times." The reality is that a handful of nukes cannot destroy a country, and the entire world stockpile cannot destroy mankind. Not even close.

Will it be horrific? Absolutely. Millions upon millions of dead. Can we destroy civilization? No.

The men who targeted Moscow and Washington in the 1950's had dozens of hi-yield thermonuclear warheads pointed at each city. Dozens. Not one, or two. To describe the "why" of this is beyond the scope of a quick post in a public forum, but the reasons dozens are needed is varied. And that's one city. Now, you've got to do the same for dozens if not hundreds of important cities and military bases.

The U.S. and the USSR did not build their gigantic stockpiles for bragging rights. Nukes are expensive to create and maintain. They built them because if the name of the game was thermonuclear war, that large quantity was necessary to ensure 100% target destruction.

I suspect this is coming off badly, but the essence is that nukes are hugely overrated in terms of destructive power.

Agreed!:tup:
But what about the after-effects of the fallout?
I mean climatic,genetic etc? :frown:
 
.
You're right Chogy... but the fact that millions of innocent people will die in the event of a nuclear strike is bad enough for me.

Too many civilians have already died in the past 100 years. I hope the next century will be a peaceful one.
 
.
You keep raising the "Kashmir issue" and we'd keep procrastinating it. The ultimate loser in this case will be you. If you cannot move on, we cannot help it.

Hey guyz ...i guess u wanna loose all the India then...its sad then, cuz those brotherz not gonna settle for less than whole India and Im trying to help u guyz out before they start their march.Whoever comes in their path will be taken over.:woot::cheesy:
:pakistan::pdf:
 
Last edited:
.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom