Pakistan has 110 Nuclear weapons, edges ahead of India: USA Report

[ashok321]

Mate a nuclear BOMB is a Nuclear Bomb, it doesn't matter if one is made of uranium & the other is made of plutonium, both are made to do only one thing - wipe out entire cities from the face of the earth. We are not comparing IN's P-8Is to PN's P-3Cs here.

Apple is a apple - and not an orange.
Dont ya compare one with the other and be a laughing stock.

Learn the big difference between a fission (India) and a fusion (China)

There is KT and there is MT - its a immense destruction power that can change the adversary's thoughts of engaging an enemy with such MT muscles.

 

[Bratva]

And the Chagai 1 test was based on Uranium or Platinium?

6th atomic test was based on plutonium

 

[Ayush]

hmmm. nuclear minds at work.

 

[ashok321]

6th atomic test was based on plutonium

Please substantiate/corroborate, expound on above....

 

[Bratva]

Please substantiate/corroborate, expound on above....

Chagai-II - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

 

[r3alist]

Nuclear bombs dont make a nation, there needs to be a nation to protect for them to have a valid use.

At this rate, they may increasingly become a liability.

 

[ashok321]

Chagai-II - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Well, according to International observers, the yield was ONLY 2KT.
So whats is the big deal about it?

What impact did pakistan create with such a pony yield?

Nuclear bombs dont make a nation, there needs to be a nation to protect for them to have a valid use.

At this rate, they may increasingly become a liability.

Roll them back...Forget Kahuta.
Thanks for having such a nice thinking.
But, before anything, consult Ummah first.

 

[Bratva]

Well, according to International observers, the yield was ONLY 2KT.
So whats is the big deal about it?

What impact did pakistan create with such a pony yield?


Roll them back...Forget Kahuta.
Thanks for having such a nice thinking.
But, before anything, consult Ummah first.

Tactical Battlefield Nuke Missiles. A.k.A Nasr. Plus Perfect for cruise missile delivering a tactical nuke with such high precision

and yield recorded in 1998 was 2KT. After 14 years, Advancements must have been made surely.

 

[ashok321]

The critical mass of a bare mass sphere of 90% enriched uranium-235 is 52 kg. Correspondingly, the critical mass of a bare mass sphere of plutonium-239 is 8–10 kg. The bomb that destroyed Hiroshima used 60 kg of U-235 while the Nagasaki Pu bomb used only 6 kg of Pu-239. Since all Pakistani bomb designs are implosion-type weapons, they will typically use between 15–25 kg of U-235 for their cores. Reducing the amount of U-235 in cores from 60 kg in gun-type devices to 25 kg in implosion devices is only possible by using good neutron reflector/tamper material such as beryllium metal, which increases the weight of the bomb. And the uranium, like plutonium, is only usable in the core of a bomb in metallic form.

Talking of mass, yield, the Plutonium wins versus Uranium and for this nobody needs an argument to augment his/her views.

 

[trident2010]

How come reports pin point the numbers of the weapons. 110 doesn't look like a guess?

 

[ashok321]

Tactical Battlefield Nuke Missiles. A.k.A Nasr. Plus Perfect for cruise missile delivering a tactical nuke with such high precision

and yield recorded in 1998 was 2KT. After 14 years, Advancements must have been made surely.

Ohh, so, on default, you are banking on future of Pakistan's dubious nuclear activities sans any transparency?

Do you have any credible material to corroborate your frail claim if any?

If there are/were any such improvements to boost your claim - please enlist them.

 

[Bratva]

Ohh, so, on default, you are banking on future of Pakistan's dubious nuclear activities sans any transparency?

Do you have any credible material to corroborate your frail claim if any?

If there are/were any such improvements to boost your claim - please enlist them.

Commercial satellite photos of Pakistan Nuclear Complex showing new development activities which shows Plutonium production is priority for us and hence inferred from such activities if Pakistan is boosting its plutonium production than related R&D is also carried out..

P.S. Pray tell us, do India carries out it's dubious nuclear activities with transparency?

 

[ashok321]

How come reports pin point the numbers of the weapons. 110 doesn't look like a guess?

Talking of reports!
This is done reasonably well with enough material knowledge gained in relative field.

However, Its talking about Pakistan and not about India, who has more weapon grade material than Pakistan, India has not mated warheads with fissile cores - which remain separated.

India has enough fissile material (Tritium included) to produce about 400 Nuke Bombs. If you take into account of years of plutonium production in India.

 

[DroneMailini]

Actually no-one knows How many Nukes India have..! But this is for sure that India have +100 Nukes and a larger fissle material Ready to produce more Nukes in short period of Time.

And as we have two nuclear armed neighbours then it is for sure that India posses more number of Nuclear weapons then what is actually shown in reports..The number of nukes India have is a Top-secret ..! And only few people will be know out of a billion of us that How many nukes we have(numbers) and where they are stored.

And now we already got Civil-nuclear deal... So, we can double-fold the number of our nukes in a very short period of time.

Please don't talk about agreements one of our neighbor was already irritated by the deal, requested their ally to grant a similar deal to them, but they refused, Frustrated by the behavior of their ally they went to have a deal with another person. The danger is some people may try to quote even your post to make a claim that this not good for region.

Actually no-one knows How many Nukes India have..! But this is for sure that India have +100 Nukes and a larger fissle material Ready to produce more Nukes in short period of Time.

And as we have two nuclear armed neighbours then it is for sure that India posses more number of Nuclear weapons then what is actually shown in reports..The number of nukes India have is a Top-secret ..! And only few people will be know out of a billion of us that How many nukes we have(numbers) and where they are stored.

And now we already got Civil-nuclear deal... So, we can double-fold the number of our nukes in a very short period of time.

Please don't talk about agreements one of our neighbor was already irritated by the deal, requested their ally to grant a similar deal to them, but they refused, Frustrated by the behavior of their ally they went to have a deal with another person. The danger is some people may try to quote even your post to make a claim that this not good for region.

 

[ashok321]

Commercial satellite photos of Pakistan Nuclear Complex showing new development activities which shows Plutonium production is priority for us and hence inferred from such activities if Pakistan is boosting its plutonium production than related R&D is also carried out..

P.S. Pray tell us, do India carries out it's dubious nuclear activities with transparency?

Oh my....You omniscient!

Tell me which commercial satellite in the whole world IS capable to determine whether Pakistan Nuclear Complex is doing a development in PU or EU before I consider proceeding further on this with you baby.....

And as for as India is concerned, they have handed out through the media reams of material, where Pakistan comes shy....why?