Yeah, that's really strange that drones have resumed but supply routes are still halted. They are usually tied together. What could be going on.
It does explain everything............
The CIA asked Islamabad’s permission for a drone strike in North Waziristan but cancelled it when Pakistan declined.
The CIA asked Islamabad’s permission for a drone strike in North Waziristan but cancelled it when Pakistan declined.
US officials have admitted that after the November 24 border intrusion by Nato forces, a drone strike in the tribal areas was cancelled when Pakistan was asked but refused permission for it, American newspaper The Washington Post has reported.
After the border clash, the officials said,
the Obama administration had decided to suspend its regular and hugely unpopular drone campaign inside Pakistan to avoid further unsettling relations. There was a 55-day hiatus.
Then, early this month, in a rare display of deference the Central Intelligence Agency informed the Pakistani government that it planned a drone strike against a terrorist target in the North Waziristan tribal region and asked Islamabad’s permission. When Pakistan declined, the strike was cancelled, officials said.
However, barely a week later when the US wanted to launch another drone strike in North Waziristan, officials said that Pakistan was notified in advance but permission was not sought. Another drone strike followed two days afterward.
Thanks, but no thanks: Pakistan tells Grossman
The paper also reports that Marc Grossman, the Obama administration’s top diplomat in charge of Afghanistan and Pakistan, had asked to visit Islamabad during his current trip to the region, but Pakistani officials responded that it was not convenient.
Grossman is due to visit regional capitals Ankara, Riyadh, Abu Dhabi, Doha and Kabul this week in what is being termed the US’ new push to engage the Taliban.
The move by Pakistani officials seems to imply that, in the aftermath of the November killings of Pakistani soldiers by Nato forces, the country is changing its attitude on US overtures towards the Taliban. But security officials and analysts who spoke to The Washington Post said that there were no significant changes in bilateral counterterrorism cooperation.
The “fundamentals” of mutual interest in destroying al Qaeda and safely managing Pakistan’s nuclear arsenal haven’t changed, said a senior Obama administration official, who, like several sources in this article, discussed sensitive diplomatic matters on condition of anonymity.
But, he said, the two countries are trying to find what he called “a new normal” — somewhere between the strategic alliance that US President Obama once proffered in exchange for Pakistan severing its ties with militants, and a
more businesslike arrangement with few illusions.
“It’ll be much more realpolitik,” another US official said. “It’s getting away from the grandiose vision of what could be to focusing on what is.”
Pakistan seeks change
However, a senior Pakistani military official told the paper that the country wants some “significant changes” in the way Pakistan and the US do business. Speaking about past incidents of bilateral intelligence and military cooperation in pursuit of Pakistan-based al Qaeda and Taliban militants, he said, “We’ve had some glorious times.” But he spoke emotionally about the deaths of the 24 soldiers in November and said the incident would not soon be forgotten.
The same, he said, is true of what he called other “insults” in 2011, including the Raymond Davis killings, the May 2 Abbottabad raid and then US chairman of joint chiefs of staff Admiral Mike Mullen’s statement that the Haqqani group was a ‘veritable’ arm of Pakistan’s ISI.
Reviewing cooperation
A Pakistani parliamentary committee, with input from feuding military and civilian political factions, is conducting what Prime Minister Yousuf Raza Gilani on Saturday called “a full review of the terms of cooperation” with America and the US-led international coalition in Afghanistan.
A senior Pakistani government official said the committee’s recommendations will probably include a demand for explicit US assurances that there will be no violation of sovereignty — no American boots on the ground, no more unilateral raids, no manned airstrikes. The official said there is likely to be some arrangement on drone attacks, with Pakistan calling for large reductions in their number and geographic scope, and demanding prior notification and approval of every strike.
Any explicit agreement on drones would be a major change from past practice.
Pakistan also wants more explicit compensation for US and Nato supplies transiting its ports and roads, perhaps in the form of taxes. And it wants more comprehensive information about CIA operations and personnel. “There are over 1,000 houses in Pakistan that have been hired by the US Embassy, and we don’t know who lives in them,” the Pakistani official said.
US peace talks with the Taliban are also a top issue for Pakistan.
