so what about a masood azhar who is a terrorist released in plane hijack ? Are you going to say hijacking & holding civilians hostage is any thing but normal.
I'm going to say that when your country elected the Butcher of Gujrat as your PM (previously blacklisted by the same US who calls Masood Azhar a terrorist), we entered all sorts of moral grey areas. Not to mention support of Baloch terrorists who butcher labourers.
I'm going to say that the US, who has supported Al Qaeda allies (Al Nusra and other so-called "moderates" in Syria), indulged in various false flags or blatant lies to justify invasions (Gulf of Tonkin, Iraq), has a global network of secret prisons / blacksites for enforced disappearances and mass surveils its own citizens --- yes, certainly there is no moral high ground left to point fingers at Pakistan.
Either we all take these bad men to task --- or we stop pointing fingers.
Is Mumbai occupied territory? Why did he send terrorists over there?
Then terrorism will happen in Afghanistan
Why hasn't India made the "proof" of Hafiz Saeed's involvement in the Mumbai tragedy (it was a massive tragedy and a very unfortunate event given the number of innocents who lost their lives) public?
It wastes no opportunity to publicly shame Pakistan --- why stop now?
Let's get back on topic. Any kind of invasion or annexation of Afghanistan would be silly and counter-productive. We should have had the intel to know exactly where these bastards are hiding in Afghanistan and should have hit them with our own resources (SSG, ISI external div, drones, helos, jets, cruise missiles --- whatever).
Relying on the Afghan govt, whose intel agency we accuse of harboring the TTP, to take action against the same TTP is bordering on the insane. Each nation must take care of its enemies itself regardless of where they are hiding. It is the ISI's job to have the capability to do so (Mossad style), with the necessary help from the SSG and other tools at the disposal of the State.