kenyannoobie
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Sep 14, 2012
- Messages
- 305
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
- Location
I feel sorry for the S Africans,really I do. The Rooivalk is a wonderful platform but it was made for anti tank warfare. Selling a HCH is a tough sell; you need political reach ,FRANKLY beyond most middle countries like RSA. Fyi,the UK,Malaysia and Algeria IIRC all wanted it at one time.Procuring the Rooivalk, H215m and H225m wouldn't be a bad idea, but for it to work, a few major things will need to line up. Basically, Pakistan needs Airbus Helicopters' to not only approve of the Puma's engines and dynamic components (e.g. main rotor, tail rotor, gearbox, etc) for the Rooivalk, but also transfer the technology the engine maintenance, repair and overhaul (MRO) and dynamic components.
I believe if Pakistan gets the ability to have engine MRO and to locally manufacture the dynamic components, it would have very little trouble in locally supporting the Rooivalk, Super Puma and Caracal.
That aside, the deep commonality (engine and dynamic components) between the Rooivalk, H125m (Super Puma) and H225m (Caracal) would be a major benefit. The Rooivalk can be used as a heavyweight attack helicopter to support our armour; the Super Puma can serve as a mainstay medium-lift utility helicopter; and the Caracal can serve as a naval warfare and heavy-medium utility helicopter.
The US sabotaged the UK deal when they refused to share codes that work have let the Rooivalk shoot the TOW. S Africa should've introduced a lighter,scaled down light version. Instead they are competing with the Apache , Euro tiger and Hind each of whose makers can provide heavy hitting political economic support to potential buyers.
Also that 45 mn $ price tag is reserved for developed nations. Fyi,the Hind though not a true gunship goes for roughly a third at 16 mn $.