Pakistan Armed Forces ranked 13th most powerful on Global Firepower military strength index

[Daghalodi]

Please dont feed the troll!!!

Just give him two coconuts and let them do their tantar mantar

 

[Unite & Defend]

A British Hindu once told me India whooped China in 62.

 

[PAKISTANFOREVER]

A British Hindu once told me India whooped China in 62.

 

[Ultima Thule]

.... you lost literally every war with India . That's not a defence that's a conclusion .

* in 1947 we take part of Kashmirs you did nothing, 1965 you lost war in the battle grounds, we were reaching almost Delhi but you win on the political table, in 71 we were partially lose, in west Pakistan we were well defended by our armed force,actually we performed better than 1965's war, destroyed more IA tanks, Mechanized divisions of IA, your IAF almost totally collapsed in the front of PAF, but you win in eastern Pakistan because then superpower was backing you "soviet union" and you create mukti bahini to interfere in east pakistan,kargil war no win or losses for both side superpowers solve these problems

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indo-Pakistani_War_of_1947

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indo-Pakistani_War_of_1965

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indo-Pakistani_War_of_1971

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kargil_War

you believe in Wikipedia good for your health where anyone can edit anything wrong

 

[PAKISTANFOREVER]

Baseless delusions Chagai-I is pakistans first nuclear test in 1998 , India is literally the first Asian country to get a nuclear reactors in 53, there has been cold tests throughout the 60s






"Claims" from Pakistanis lol , the very same Pakistani leaders were crying India had nukes in 1965







Your pm bhutto was crying like a window to the UN claiming we had nukes , india had started its nuclear weapons program in 1959 after china started its



Nope , Pakistan was negotiating with China for nuclear teach in the late 80s , and U.S. knew all out it, CIA has declassified those files & are available for the public.



10pisa site kek , high IQ people of the most illiterate country in south asia

Also your $hitty link is using a survey from 2002





Its at the reference in the wiki links . Deal with it .



What are you 5?



Again your entire military arsenal =30% of Indian military arsenal

Enjoy the depression

Again, no evidence to back ANY of your claims. Just hot air and conjecture. You are simply regurgitating indian propaganda. Non of which is true. You insist on wiki which is never reliable. So you admit to false propaganda.

By the way IQ of a race barely increases 2 points in 120 years let alone 16.......:

https://iq-research.info/en/page/average-iq-by-country#

You posted a photoclip of a table with info on literacy in Asia. Can you provide the full link?

So where is the evidence that Pakistan has 30% of india's military capacity?
The way we have been slaughtering your soldiers unopposed on the LOC with impunity does not portend to this fact. If true then why is india too weak, powerless and incapable of fighting Pakistan despite being more than 7x bigger than us and having abundant access to the world's most advanced weapons systems whilst we are denied this privilege?

You are beginning to sound like the indian army who claimed to have carried out surgical strikes against Pakistan but who have NO evidence nor does anyone else for that matter.......

 

[Ultima Thule]

Kek Pakistani education

you invaded kashmir & its king , not India . Pakistan already controlled the capital when hari singh flead to India & seaded Kashmir to India . We took 60% of Pakistani controled territory.

where you took 60% pakistani side kashmirs, in your wet dream kid and are trying to create your own version of history kid get lost and STFU, you're reported for your ranting without the prove

 

[patman]

* in 1947 we take part of Kashmirs you did nothing,

Again , Kashmir was a independent princely state that Pakistan invaded , loosing the war , Kashmir king signed over it to India who kicked out pak troops & took 60% of free land

1965 you lost war in the battle grounds, we were reaching almost Delhi

I'm sure your they reached the moon too

In 71 we were partially lose,

Partially

in

west Pakistan we were well defended by our armed force,actually we performed better than 1965's war, destroyed more IA tanks, Mechanized divisions of IA, your IAF almost totally collapsed in the front of PAF, but you win in eastern Pakistan

Did you reach the sun this time ? Your military surrendered in less than 2 weeks fighting indian soilders

kargil war no win or losses for both side superpowers solve these problems

So a country that successfully kicks out invading army's annexation attempt is not a victory now .

Wow

 

[Ultima Thule]

Baseless delusions Chagai-I is pakistans first nuclear test in 1998 , India is literally the first Asian country to get a nuclear reactors in 53, there has been cold tests throughout the 60s






"Claims" from Pakistanis lol , the very same Pakistani leaders were crying India had nukes in 1965







Your pm bhutto was crying like a window to the UN claiming we had nukes , india had started its nuclear weapons program in 1959 after china started its



Nope , Pakistan was negotiating with China for nuclear teach in the late 80s , and U.S. knew all out it, CIA has declassified those files & are available for the public.



10pisa site kek , high IQ people of the most illiterate country in south asia

Also your $hitty link is using a survey from 2002





Its at the reference in the wiki links . Deal with it .



What are you 5?



Again your entire military arsenal =30% of Indian military arsenal

Enjoy the depression



1947:

got 60% of Kashmir occupied by Pakistan .

1965 :
Prevention of Pakistani annexation of Kashmir

1971:
Simla agreement
Official surrender
Bangladesh liberation

1999:
Pakistan failed to annex kargil

prove give us the neutral links to prove your point kid
if you don't gives us the reliable/neutral links use this on your butts

its a pain killer

Again , Kashmir was a independent princely state that Pakistan invaded , loosing the war , Kashmir king signed over it to India who kicked out pak troops & took 60% of free land




I'm sure your they reached the moon too



Partially

in

Did you reach the sun this time ? Your military surrendered in less than 2 weeks fighting indian soilders

provide reliable/neutral prove for your clams kid, are you have a comprehension problems ki, you won east Pakistan, we won in west Pakistan, Kid provide a links that we occupied by Pakistan at the time of independence and that Kashmirs king non Muslim and people of Kashmir still waiting for ref-random to either they go with Pakistan or with India, so your occupation of IOK is illegal and simple most of Kashmirs don't want live with India give a neutral links for your claims you stubborn @patman

Again , Kashmir was a independent princely state that Pakistan invaded , loosing the war , Kashmir king signed over it to India who kicked out pak troops & took 60% of free land




I'm sure your they reached the moon too



Partially

in

Did you reach the sun this time ? Your military surrendered in less than 2 weeks fighting indian soilders

provide reliable/neutral prove for your clams kid, are you have a comprehension problems ki, you won east Pakistan, we won in west Pakistan, Kid provide a links that we occupied by Pakistan at the time of independence and that Kashmirs king non Muslim and people of Kashmir still waiting for ref-random to either they go with Pakistan or with India, so your occupation of IOK is illegal and simple most of Kashmirs don't want live with India give a neutral links for your claims you stubborn @patman

 

[-blitzkrieg-]

https://tribune.com.pk/story/164902...ful-global-firepower-military-strength-index/

Pakistan Armed Forces ranked 13th most powerful on Global Firepower military strength index
By Usman Kabir
Published: March 2, 2018
95SHARES
Share Tweet Email

A photo of Pakistan army. PHOTO: AFP

KARACHI: Pakistan Armed Forces have been ranked the 13th most powerful in the world on the Global Firepower Military Strength Index 2017, according to data released by the group on its official website.

The list by Global Firepower (GFP) relies on more than 50 factors to assign the 133 countries included in the survey an individual Power Index (PI) score, based upon their conventional war-making capability across land, sea and air.

Taking into account the diversity of weapons possessed by each nation, the published results include values related to the resources, finances and the particular geographical position of each country.

Each military power is judged on an individual as well as collective factors. The method used for calculating the final power index score has not been made public, although the official website of GFP outlines that “our formula allows smaller, more technologically advanced countries, to compete with larger, lesser developed ones”.

Pakistan military ranked 11th strongest in world

The GFP has cautioned that the PI score should be viewed in the context of certain basic assumptions that were made before it was calculated.

For example, the score does not rely on the “number of weapons each nation has, but on their relative diversity”, nuclear stockpiles are “not taken into account but recognised in the form of bonus points”, geographical factors and manpower are “key considerations” in the final score, landlocked nations are “not docked points for lack of naval forces”, and political and military leadership of individual countries does not have any bearing on the PI.

As political tensions heat up the arms race across the world, a lot of countries are in the process of modernising their existing weaponry, both conventional and nuclear. According to Business Insider, between 2012 and 2016, more weapons were delivered to countries seeking them than during any five-year period since 1990. GFP aims to provide a rare military-to-military comparison of where nations stand in relation to each other, the US-based publication highlights.

“Balance is the key – a large, strong fighting force across land, sea and air backed by a resilient economy and defensible territory, along with an efficient infrastructure – such qualities are those used to round out a particular nation’s total fighting strength on paper,” the GFP ranking states.

Pakistan Armed Forces

The armed forces of the country have been ranked 13th out of a list of 133 countries based on their capability on land, sea and air, as well as their financial dexterity, and the size of the geographical boundaries of Pakistan with other states.

In the annual GFP review of 2017, Pakistan Armed Forces scored 0.3287, 0.000 being the perfect score in the list, on the Military Strength Power Index. Currently, the country dedicates $7 billion from its annual budget for defence purposes.

China is a powerful country but we are not a weak nation: Indian army chief

Manpower is an important part of the PI score, and GFP notes that “wars of attrition usually favour those with more manpower”. Pakistan has 919,000 total military personnel, out of which 637,000 are on active duty, the GFP database reveals. With a total population of 201,995,540 people, there are approximately 95,000,000 men available for duty in the country, 75,325,000 of which are “fit-for-service”.

An assessment of the air power of the country, which include “both fixed wing and rotary wing (helicopters)” types, has put the total aircraft strength of Pakistan Armed Forces at 951. The list includes aircraft from all branches of the forces. According to GFP, Pakistan has 301 fighter aircraft, 394 attack aircraft, and 316 helicopters, 52 of those which are attack choppers.

The evaluation of the strength of land forces in Pakistan classifies the number of combat tanks, armoured vehicles, and rocket projectors, among other equipment, that the military has. GFP data have put the total number of combat tanks owned by the country at 2,924. In addition to these, Pakistan has 2,828 armoured fighting vehicles and 134 rocket projectors.

Another important consideration in the total PI score is naval assets, and the GFP notes that Pakistan has a total of 197 naval assets, of which 17 are patrol crafts, eight are submarines, and 10 frigates.

Indian Armed Forces

The armed forces of arch-rival India are ranked 4th on the Power Index, with a score of 0.1593. According to the GFP, India currently spends $51 billion from its annual budget on the military, which is almost seven times more than what Pakistan does.

Pakistan has done enough for everyone, will not do more: DG ISPR

With a population more than 5 times that of Pakistan, it has 4,207,250 total military personnel, and 1,362,500 are on active duty. Compared to Pakistan’s 951, India has 2,102 total aircraft; 676 interceptors, 809 attack aircraft, and 666 helicopters. India also has double the number of battle tanks, armoured vehicles, naval assets, submarines included, as compared to Pakistan.

Most powerful military in the world

The United States military has been ranked the most powerful armed force in the world, closely followed by Russia and China.

US has a PI score of 0.0857, Russia comes in second on the list with 0.929, and China is third with 0.0945. The US spends almost $600 billion annually on defence, while China spends close to $161 billion. The Russian Federation, surprisingly, only spends about $45 billion on its armed forces.

In terms of total military personnel, China beats US and Russia. The rising superpower has a total military strength of 3,712,500, compared to 3,371,027 of Russia and 2,363,675 of the US.

‘Nuclear bluff’ assertion speaks of Indian army chief’s immaturity, says ISPR

Another astonishing statistic highlights the wide disparity in the aerial strength of world countries on the list, wherein the US, according to GFP, is revealed as possessing an astounding 13,762 aircraft, 6,065 of which are helicopters. Russia has a total of 3,794 aircraft, while China only 2,955.

When it comes to land forces, Russia beats its rivals in terms of military equipment. Russia owns close to 20,216 combat tanks, 31,098 armoured vehicles. The US, on the other hand, only has around 5,000 combat tanks, but 41,062 armoured fighting vehicles. China, compared to both, has only 6,457 combat tanks and 4,788 armoured vehicles.

Naval assets, increasingly viewed as the ‘strength benchmark’ of a nation’s armed forces, are also indicative of the global clout of US, Russia and China. In terms of overall numbers, the assets of all three countries are not all that different from each other. However, the US has 19 aircraft carriers, and Russia and China each have just one.

[


Why propagate such a loser article from a loser news portal. .

 

[Hakikat ve Hikmet]

And, 1st in facing enemies - be it the known Super Powers or a 7x larger nuclear armed mortal enemy!!! Hodri Meydan....

 

[PAKISTANFOREVER]

Lol the guy blowing fart claims is calling me hot air , if you are too lazy to click on links that's your problem. Your only defence is " the internet is lieing" , its like arguing with a flat earther

Before you go on claiming you are the arab version of Einstein , I would suggest you to learn to read before your type , Pakistan literally has the lowest literally rate in south Asia . Barely 50% of your country can read .

https://asia.ub-speeda.com/en/country-report-2017-sri-lanka-the-dollar-hungry-nation/

https://tribune.com.pk/story/897995...misses-un-target-with-58-literacy-rate/?amp=1

Basic math & comparison on any site with that data will show it , your military doesn't even have 30% of anything

https://www.globalfirepower.com/cou...untry1=india&country2=pakistan&Submit=COMPARE


Its amusing to see Pakistanis grasp straws about surgical strike , bbc published a article with dozens of Pakistani eye witness confession , but of course , BBC is not good source for you now

But NONE of your sources prove that Pakistan lost all it's wars against india nor does it prove that the indian race has a high iq. india has a 7x larger population than Pakistan so it will have more conventional weapons than us, but that has been completely nullified by our nukes. Therefore more meaningless conjecture.

So where is the evidence from your previous posts that india has been a nuke power since the 1950s or that the indian mythological surgical strikes took place? Need independent, irrefutable, reliable and accurate sources.

All you are doing here is once again proving that indians just talk, blow hot air but cannot prove anything nor can they back up what they say with actions. As a result everything you say changes nothing nor does it mean anything.

 

[PAKISTANFOREVER]

Kek you have no proof or counter to my argument & links so all you can do is mock me to avoid answering lol

Soild logic, unless you are going to debunk my links don't tag me , I don't want to pointlessly argue with 10 year-olds at 1am

There is no argument here. It can only happen when someone has reliable, independent, honest and accurate sources to back up their claims. Otherwise everything you say is meaningless conjecture and hot air. Nothingness. Just oblivion into a black hole. Empty words by an empty and souless existence.

 

[Unite & Defend]

Yep

 

[PAKISTANFOREVER]

Yep

They really do live in a retarded delusional bollywood fantasy world.........


When Brazil won the 2002 world cup in Japan, I remeber some indian claiming that if indian played in the football world cup that they would defeat both Germany and Brazil..........

 

[Ultima Thule]

Kek you have no proof or counter to my argument & links so all you can do is mock me to avoid answering lol

Soild logic, unless you are going to debunk my links don't tag me , I don't want to pointlessly argue with 10 year-olds at 1am

Don't runaway to provide reliable/neutral links other than wiki kid to prove that we lost all wars kid @patman