What's new

Pakistan alleges role of US behind No Confidence Vote against PTI government

Look at his post count on this forum. 10000 Posts, (member since Sep 2018.) and he is lobbying for the narrative of PDM.

Looks like a full time propaganda job if you ask me.
He works on a per post basis, I believe his remunerations are a plate of biryani every day, he never engages in any discussion, all he does is post propaganda. We also have the official goalkeeper of PML N here (Chak Bamu) :thinktank:
 
You believe every lie your government tells you and here we have proof and you are saying we believe without proof.

I don't beleive anything without evidence, especially not politicians.
 
I don't beleive anything without evidence, especially not politicians.

USA use to regularly accuse Pakistan for supporting Taliban without a shred of evidence. But American believed them otherwise, no?

USA diplomats met Opposition leaders instrumental in initialting No confidence Vote in MARCH. Around 9-12 Pakistani leaders. There are documented proof of their meetings. Pictures, Videos. Why American Diplomatic staff is engaging opposition leaders instead of Government of Pakistan?
 
View attachment 829300
  • White House Communications Director Kate Bedingfield categorically rejects PM Imran Khan’s allegation.
  • We are closely following developments in Pakistan, says Ned Price.
  • US respects and supports Pakistan’s constitutional process and rule of law, says State Department spokesperson.
The White House responded early Friday to the PM’s speech, in which he named the US government over the no-trust motion against him.

In a televised address to the nation on Thursday, referring to the "threatening memo" that the PM claimed to have received against his government from a foreign country, he mistakenly named the United States to be behind the conspiracy.

In an apparent slip of the tongue, he named "the United States..." but quickly moved on and stated that "a foreign country" had sent a "threatening memo" which was against the Pakistani nation.

During a regular press briefing, White House Communications Director Kate Bedingfield categorically rejected PM Imran Khan’s allegation.

Responding to a question that the Prime Minister of Pakistan accused the US government of working to remove him from power, Bedingfield said, "absolutely no truth to that allegation".

A day earlier, responding to a question asked by Geo News regarding the ‘threat letter,’ the US State Department categorically rejected any kind of involvement in the no-confidence motion against PM Imran Khan.

“Allegations of US involvement in the no-trust motion and ‘threat letter’ to PM Imran Khan are baseless,” said the State Department.

Meanwhile, US State Department Spokesperson Ned Price also rejected Imran Khan’s statement that the US government is trying to oust him.

During a regular press briefing, Price was asked to comment on PM Imran Khan’s allegation, to which the US official said, "we are closely following developments in Pakistan, we respect and support Pakistan’s constitutional process and rule of law".

“However, when it comes to that allegation, there is no truth to it,” he concluded.

What is the 'threat letter'?​

On Sunday, the premier, during what PTI labelled as one of its "biggest" rallies in its history at the Parade Ground in Islamabad, flashed a letter before the public, saying that he has "written evidence" that "money has been pouring in from abroad," while "some of our people are being used to topple the government."

He had said that for months, "plotting and planning is being carried out to influence the foreign policy of Pakistan from outside."

However, during a televised speech to the nation a day earlier, in an apparent slip of the tongue, the PM named "the United States..." but quickly moved on and stated that "a foreign country" had sent a "threatening memo" which was against the Pakistani nation.

"...the letter stated that the no-confidence motion was being tabled even before it was filed, which means the Opposition was in contact with them," the premier alleged.

PM Imran Khan said the memo was against him, not against the government. "...it stated that if the no-confidence motion passes, Pakistan will be forgiven, if not, there will be consequences."

The premier stated that it was an "official letter" that was communicated to Pakistan's ambassador, who was taking notes during the meeting.

Pakistan lodged protest with US government​

After the National Security Committee (NSC) decision to issue a strong demarche to the country whose official communicated the "threat".

Pakistan summoned the US acting deputy chief of mission in Islamabad over the ‘threat letter’ and registered strong protest for the undiplomatic language used against Pakistan in the memo, according to sources in the Foreign Office.

The sources said Pakistan told the US envoy that interference in the internal affairs of Pakistan is unacceptable.
Am sorry Kate my pet won't believe a thing what you said but I am listening as we do listen to all sort of rubbish everyday including this one. Just admit it US have got other ways of doing things and its a slip of the tongue but motives are all the same.
We have heard about these denials before too and once upon a time Bhutto received similar letter as well and once he gone public he got legally executed.
 
I don't beleive anything without evidence, especially not politicians.
US makes up evidence to support their lies, but still there is more evidence of their lies, if you dig deep.
 
USA use to regularly accuse Pakistan for supporting Taliban without a shred of evidence. But American believed them otherwise, no?

USA diplomats met Opposition leaders instrumental in initialting No confidence Vote in MARCH. Around 9-12 Pakistani leaders. There are documented proof of their meetings.

Pakistani diplomats met with Republicans, is Pakistan plotting regime change in the US?
 
Pakistani diplomats met with Republicans, is Pakistan plotting regime change in the US?

Did Pakistani diplomat met any democrat's when they were about to impeach President Trump?
 
View attachment 829300
US respects and supports Pakistan’s constitutional process and rule of law, says State Department spokesperson.

1648814559099.jpeg



When has the US ever respected Pakistan?
 
Look we can only influence our internal environment and make sure it is robust enough to not be bought off like this.

Article 6 high treason on all the politicians who are involved in this coup and make an example out of them. Put them on a flight ban ASAP and ISI need to get to Husain Haqqani somehow.
 
View attachment 829300
  • White House Communications Director Kate Bedingfield categorically rejects PM Imran Khan’s allegation.
  • We are closely following developments in Pakistan, says Ned Price.
  • US respects and supports Pakistan’s constitutional process and rule of law, says State Department spokesperson.
The White House responded early Friday to the PM’s speech, in which he named the US government over the no-trust motion against him.

In a televised address to the nation on Thursday, referring to the "threatening memo" that the PM claimed to have received against his government from a foreign country, he mistakenly named the United States to be behind the conspiracy.

In an apparent slip of the tongue, he named "the United States..." but quickly moved on and stated that "a foreign country" had sent a "threatening memo" which was against the Pakistani nation.

During a regular press briefing, White House Communications Director Kate Bedingfield categorically rejected PM Imran Khan’s allegation.

Responding to a question that the Prime Minister of Pakistan accused the US government of working to remove him from power, Bedingfield said, "absolutely no truth to that allegation".

A day earlier, responding to a question asked by Geo News regarding the ‘threat letter,’ the US State Department categorically rejected any kind of involvement in the no-confidence motion against PM Imran Khan.

“Allegations of US involvement in the no-trust motion and ‘threat letter’ to PM Imran Khan are baseless,” said the State Department.

Meanwhile, US State Department Spokesperson Ned Price also rejected Imran Khan’s statement that the US government is trying to oust him.

During a regular press briefing, Price was asked to comment on PM Imran Khan’s allegation, to which the US official said, "we are closely following developments in Pakistan, we respect and support Pakistan’s constitutional process and rule of law".

“However, when it comes to that allegation, there is no truth to it,” he concluded.

What is the 'threat letter'?​

On Sunday, the premier, during what PTI labelled as one of its "biggest" rallies in its history at the Parade Ground in Islamabad, flashed a letter before the public, saying that he has "written evidence" that "money has been pouring in from abroad," while "some of our people are being used to topple the government."

He had said that for months, "plotting and planning is being carried out to influence the foreign policy of Pakistan from outside."

However, during a televised speech to the nation a day earlier, in an apparent slip of the tongue, the PM named "the United States..." but quickly moved on and stated that "a foreign country" had sent a "threatening memo" which was against the Pakistani nation.

"...the letter stated that the no-confidence motion was being tabled even before it was filed, which means the Opposition was in contact with them," the premier alleged.

PM Imran Khan said the memo was against him, not against the government. "...it stated that if the no-confidence motion passes, Pakistan will be forgiven, if not, there will be consequences."

The premier stated that it was an "official letter" that was communicated to Pakistan's ambassador, who was taking notes during the meeting.

Pakistan lodged protest with US government​

After the National Security Committee (NSC) decision to issue a strong demarche to the country whose official communicated the "threat".

Pakistan summoned the US acting deputy chief of mission in Islamabad over the ‘threat letter’ and registered strong protest for the undiplomatic language used against Pakistan in the memo, according to sources in the Foreign Office.

The sources said Pakistan told the US envoy that interference in the internal affairs of Pakistan is unacceptable.
Aen Baen Shaen

constitutional process and rule of law, says State Department spokesperson.

Not categorically denying the intervention or not a single word of Sovereign Policy
 
Back
Top Bottom