Pakistan Air Force to gain superiority over the Indian Air Force

[Pak_Sher]

Agreed..One should always...So let's try
a) 1948 - Kashmir was not part of India...We stopped your aggression...So you want to term it as victory then please go ahead..
b) Whatever you gave to China was always under your control. It is not like you won something from us and gave it to them. You want to term it as a victory...go ahead..
c) 1971 - There is not much to talk
d) 1984 - Siachen is with us
e) 1999 - Kargil is still with us...

Above all status quo on Kashmir is still maintained...Now call it victory...loss or whatever it will not mean anything nor it will change anything...

If Kashmir was in Pakistan control in 1948, then why did the war start? What does the Indian history book tell you.

By the way if India has the guts they can come and recapture 26% of Azad Kashmir?

East Pakistan was a liability with more damage in floods than their revenue every year and we are glad they have their country. Yes, we did show India in Kargil that we can walk in whenever a need arises, but India does not have the guts to do that.

After all your wish for failure of LCA.....LCA has become reality...so sad for you...you wish did not get fulfilled

You are 100% correct, it just took LCA from 1979 until 2010 to become a reality. We are happy LCA is part of IAF. Additon of obsolete fighters do not pose a threat to the PAF or PLAAF.

 

[Bobby]

You are right Kashmir is still with India. It was 100% with India before the 1948 War, but India only had 77% of it after the 1948 War.

Yes India was left with 74% of Kashmir after the 1965 War. Kashmir is sill with India just 26% less. Pakistan did give 9% of Kashmir to China, but since Pakistan Army was the victor, it had the right to hand over the territory to China.

Let's get the facts straight.

Wrong..Kashmir was not with India before 1948 war..since Pakistan attacked Kashmir..India got reason to capture Kashmir...and when India reached Kashmir...Pakistan already capture 75% of Kashmir..and then India pushed Pakistan back to 20% of Kashmir.... If Pakistan would have not gone for this war..there were good chance that 100% Kashmir could be Pakistan side...so due to this war India got a case....thanks to Pakistan...India have 80% of Kashmir. Later India captured Siachen because India knew Pakistan will give it China and it will be very bad situation for India

Pakistan got 20% Kashmir...give it to anybody who cares...you wont get anymore of Kashmir

 

[karan.1970]

If Kashmir was in Pakistan control in 1948, then why did the war start? What does the Indian history book tell you.

It was neither with India, nor with Pakistan.. It was a separate Muslim majority princely state who had not made up its mind on which country to join. Jinnah in his insecurities, ordered the invasion that led to the king of kashmir to accede to India and invite Indian forces to repel the invasion. Indian army pushed the Pakistani irregulars and Pakistani army from the town border of Srinagar back...

By the way if India has the guts they can come and recapture 26% of Azad Kashmir?

Not needed.. Kashmir is Pakistan's Monkey trap.. Not India's.. And its working very well.. Till the time Pakistan has this uncontrollable urge to get Kashmir, the downward spiral of its economy and security continues and that works very well for India...

http://www.defence.pk/forums/strategic-geopolitical-issues/44215-monkey-trap.html

East Pakistan was a liability with more damage in floods than their revenue every year and we are glad they have their country.

I love it when Pakistanis like you exhibit the sour grapes syndrome.. Especially when that leads to them disowning their own countrymen and their own regions.. Tells me that India's Pakistan policies are working well..

Yes, we did show India in Kargil that we can walk in whenever a need arises, but India does not have the guts to do that.

Oh! you mean when you sent in your military disguised as terrorists and disowned them in front of the world. And then when your COAS was busted by RAW in international media, your PM was summoned like a criminal to Washington and was flogged by the American govt (unbelievable).. In the end, Pakistan lost whatever credibility it had on the Kashmir issue... As I say, 2nd biggest blunder in Pakistan's Kashmir misadventure.. First one being the tribal invasion of 1947

 

[45'22']

If Kashmir was in Pakistan control in 1948, then why did the war start? What does the Indian history book tell you.

By the way if India has the guts they can come and recapture 26% of Azad Kashmir?

East Pakistan was a liability with more damage in floods than their revenue every year and we are glad they have their country. Yes, we did show India in Kargil that we can walk in whenever a need arises, but India does not have the guts to do that.

You are 100% correct, it just took LCA from 1979 until 2010 to become a reality. We are happy LCA is part of IAF. Additon of obsolete fighters do not pose a threat to the PAF or PLAAF.

Kashmir was a buffer state and pakistan was the aggressor,the king asked for our help and we interfered

 

[Bobby]

If Kashmir was in Pakistan control in 1948, then why did the war start? What does the Indian history book tell you.

By the way if India has the guts they can come and recapture 26% of Azad Kashmir?

East Pakistan was a liability with more damage in floods than their revenue every year and we are glad they have their country. Yes, we did show India in Kargil that we can walk in whenever a need arises, but India does not have the guts to do that.



You are 100% correct, it just took LCA from 1979 until 2010 to become a reality. We are happy LCA is part of IAF. Additon of obsolete fighters do not pose a threat to the PAF or PLAAF.

No Kashmir was not with Pakistan neither with India before 1948 war....I know you learned wrong history.

Everybody knows that 26% is a waste land ......best irrigation flat land and major cities of Kashmir with India..We dont want waste area..you can keep it.


LCA with latest RADAR, engine and made of 98% composite material, is far better than dummy JF17

 

[RazPaK]

Can somebody tell this fool S-19 how Pakistan whipped Indian father, Russia's *** in Afghanistan during the eighties?

India may have superior fighters, but their pilots and tactics are no match for Pakistan.


Ask your ruski daddies, S-19.

 

[Kyusuibu Honbu]

On training and technological comparison level i think Pakistan and India are pretty much on the same level.

The numbers are what make difference, in war of attrition, PAF will face a deficiency like 1971, to commit her assets to other fronts.

Indian aircraft carrier will ensure that.

 

[45'22']

thw world has changed so much today,even if for a second we believe that paf was better at any point that doesnt mean IAF hasnt improved and the days of dog fights are gone,u can engage in dog fight if u u can survive the bvr's.so the question is who will detect whom first,so technology is very much reqd,and that was seen in last indo pak war,now u can troll

 

[Nishan_101]

Although we might get more superior if we have build the JF-17 in numbers like 110 of each blockS along with their dual seats too. More over going for the 70-110 FC-20s being made in PAC and 24 more F-16s from Venezuela in 2001-2003.
Then our PAF would look like:
330 JF-17s till 2020
70-110 FC-20s
59+24 F-16s MLU-3s
18-30 F-16s Block-52s

 

[RazPaK]

thw world has changed so much today,even if for a second we believe that paf was better at any point that doesnt mean IAF hasnt improved and the days of dog fights are gone,u can engage in dog fight if u u can survive the bvr's.so the question is who will detect whom first,so technology is very much reqd,and that was seen in last indo pak war,now u can troll

Lolz, ****-hurt Indian.



Do you honestly believe that the PAF being the superior air force, has not changed their doctrines?

 

[oct605032048]

After all your wish for failure of LCA.....LCA has become reality...so sad for you...you wish did not get fulfilled

if LCA were really one of a hell fighter why bother to buy Rafale? Why not sell it to France and Germany?

 

[45'22']

if LCA were really one of a hell fighter why bother to buy Rafale? Why not sell it to France and Germany?

bacause Tejas is a light combat interceptor and Rafale is medium combat point defence fighter,now even tejas has got the multirole tag,it is the simplest way i can let u undertand

 

[Kyusuibu Honbu]

if LCA were really one of a hell fighter

Comprehension problems? where did he mention LCA is "one of a hell fighter " in his post, he merely said LCA was reality.

why bother to buy Rafale?

Rafale is medium combat fighter.

Why not sell it to France and Germany?

Logical disabilities here?
Er.........how can sell something to another entity unless that entity shows an interest to buy so.

 

[RazPaK]

if LCA were really one of a hell fighter why bother to buy Rafale? Why not sell it to France and Germany?

Lawlz. Stop hurting others feelings man.

 

[Kyusuibu Honbu]

Lawlz. Stop hurting others feelings man.

You laugh when your feelings are hurt, very deviant!