Pakistan Air Force | News & Discussions.

[airbus101]

This is new to me when did PAF change it from 3 piece to 2 piece Canopy

 

[HAIDER]

This front shot of the F-7PG shows the much improved pilot view from the two piece canopy compared to the three piece on the older aircraft.

PAF engineers did this modifications ? . or Chinese did

 

[Dazzler]

PAF engineers did this modifications ? . or Chinese did

All MG variant which includes PG, come with two piece canopy as standard

 

[Luftwaffe]

A much better view of F-7 standard two piece canopy.

 

[fatman17]

A much better view of F-7 standard two piece canopy.

nice picture....

PAF engineers did this modifications ? . or Chinese did

collaborative effort.

 

[fatman17]

Unsung Hero!

one such professional was an unsung hero of the Pakistan Air Force, Air-Commodore Wladyslaw Turowicz, who was a Polish officer who had joined the PAF shortly after independence. He became a Pakistani citizen and served as head of maintenance of equipment and systems of the PAF.

A prominent aeronautical engineer, he is considered one of the chief architects of our space programme. He also served as the administrator of Pakistan’s Space and Upper Atmosphere Research Commission (SUPARCO) from 1967 to 1970. Turowicz died in Karachi on Jan 8, 1980.

 

[Kompromat]

Unsung Hero!

one such professional was an unsung hero of the Pakistan Air Force, Air-Commodore Wladyslaw Turowicz, who was a Polish officer who had joined the PAF shortly after independence. He became a Pakistani citizen and served as head of maintenance of equipment and systems of the PAF.

A prominent aeronautical engineer, he is considered one of the chief architects of our space programme. He also served as the administrator of Pakistan’s Space and Upper Atmosphere Research Commission (SUPARCO) from 1967 to 1970. Turowicz died in Karachi on Jan 8, 1980.

http://www.defence.pk/forums/military-history-strategy/114437-poles-paf.html

 

[fatman17]

http://www.defence.pk/forums/military-history-strategy/114437-poles-paf.html

dang..! how did i miss that thread.

 

[Windjammer]

Guys, i have managed to crop and enlarge the image that appeared in post # 583.

How many of you still think that it's photo-shopped. !!

 

[Jango]

Guys, i have managed to crop and enlarge the image that appeared in post # 583.
How many of you still think that it's photo-shopped

Me for one...

The image was available in enlarged size the first time you posted it.

 

[Windjammer]

Me for one...

The image was available in enlarged size the first time you posted it.

We managed to enlarge to to cover the full screen, you can then actually make the back ground through the haze and smoke and notice that none of the trees are obscure and distorted. !!

 

[DANGER-ZONE]

Guys, i have managed to crop and enlarge the image that appeared in post # 583.

How many of you still think that it's photo-shopped. !!

Sir, with due respect ! Its a Clear PS.
What made u think its real ?

 

[SQ8]

We managed to enlarge to to cover the full screen, you can then actually make the back ground through the haze and smoke and notice that none of the trees are obscure and distorted. !!

The issue isnt the smoke windy.. its the size of the Jet relative to the troops.. and.. the fact that its showing a strafe attack while the aircraft is aiming somewhere else.

 

[Jango]

We managed to enlarge to to cover the full screen, you can then actually make the back ground through the haze and smoke and notice that none of the trees are obscure and distorted. !!

It is clearly a different background, else why is their a thick haze only around the F-7, or is it some sort of EM cloaking gas dispersed by the F-7?

Anyways, what is the aircraft shooting at with a nose up attitude?

 

[Argus Panoptes]

It is clearly a different background, else why is their a thick haze only around the F-7, or is it some sort of EM cloaking gas dispersed by the F-7?

Anyways, what is the aircraft shooting at with a nose up attitude?

It is clearly shooting at the flying tank that is not captured by the picture, obviously.

Why is this discussion even in this thread? Air Force Monthly did not publish this picture, photoshopped or not.