Cool, but I mean like your thoughts on 60s, 70s China. We were so insane that we make the insane terrorists of today look like the moderates. We make the heart eating Syrian look like he's unsure on violence.
But things can change.
Pakistan needs a leader to change the course of history, if he can do that, then Pakistan is primed to do what I outlined. A big if, but nothing is impossible.
and Chinese intelligence is the food and drugs safety department.
@
sreekumar
China isn't a dictatorship, China has no dictator, we are authoritarian, but we are not a dictator. Which dictator steps down every 10 years like a elected president? Which president has no cult of personality?
China is not moving to democracy, we are moving to our own system that will provide Freedom, prosperity and prestige. It's possible if you think about, just like democracy doesn't promise what I stated, authoritarian doesn't mean no. It has happened before, and in China a few times too.
With the new passing of the leadership in a meritocracy fashion, it's actually quite possible that we will keep it going. But most people only see no democracy, no freedom. Yet democracy doesn't promise freedom. Freedom is Freedom.
@
third eye
1) Muslims have been united before sam way Germany has. Just like that, Germany before the empire has been divided for a while and it is through the Prussians they reunited again.
2) Why Pakistan? I'm designing this scenario for Pakistan, this is like saying if you like economics why not go to US instead of improving China. Cause we are Chinese. As long as Pakistan can be economically superior, political dominate, militarily unstoppable, and technologically advanced. It's likely, Pakistan has a few things going for it, and it's not something that runs out.
3) This scenario assumes Pakistan control and rallying support for a war is doable, especially if Pakistan plays like Muslims were robbed by the Indians.
4) again Pakistan must be the dominate force, and the union must have certain rules that guarantees Pakistan say in matters of dispute. The german states were able to do this because Prussia was the undisputed leader, and they were the undisputed prestige getter. Pakistan union can have that effect on the people if union means respect and prestige.
5) Pakistn must solve internal issues, that's for sure, this scenario is assuming that is based on the belief it could.
6) This scenario makes muslim nations relevant and makes them independent of foreign thoughts. You think Austria didn't try to stop the German Empire? OR confederation? But take what you want and let the pass people talk.
7) This scenario is not a let's talk, it's a be part of it, or we'll find someone who will agree to be part of it. Victory doesn't guarantee assimilation, but it can guarantee the joining of a group and the support of said nation. Pakistan is not going to annex, but to dominate.
8) Religion is a ruse, it's used as a bases for unity, in reality it's economy, prestige, and military that will do the talking. Religion is just a rallying cry not the first shot.
@
AUSTERLITZ
This scenario is way off the road, by then I perceive a multipolar world and Pakistan can take advantage of that and advance it's own interest, play one off the other to grow stronger and join its ranks.
