What's new

Pak would have faced US, India after 9/11: Musharraf

right decision my @ss.

usa would not have attacked Pakistan, they cant even attack Iran because Us knows that Iran might have nuclear.

Pakistan is already declared nuclear power so no chance.

mushi is just defending his wrong doings.

US had to act at any cost at that point by going with domestic pressure and it would have attacked PAK . Some members may reject it but considering that BUSH was the then prez nothing can be ruled out(he dont hasitate to give a nod for crazy moves !)Iran's case is different !
 
lol They lost war against Vietnam... destablized Iraq and last made exit strategy... and lost bloody war against talibans in Afghanistan... send Pakistan to stonge age ?? LOLZZzzzzz

What would have the US lost if they had attack you from a distance? Couold you retaliate the same way?
 
in my opinion if america attacked us we would have been more united against u.s then the divide we have now and who can guatantee that if u.s attacked us would have been successfull in his goals
u.s can invade or attack any country

TARIQ
 
What would have the US lost if they had attack you from a distance? Couold you retaliate the same way?

US assets would have been compromised in the region as well as the closest US allies.

Do you know why US is at mercy of Iran and N. Korea because both Israel and S. Korea are the targets of a massive destruction from the opposition even thought they will also get pounded 3x but they will inflict a deep wound on S.Korea and Iran on Israel.

musharraf is nothing but a barking dog who has no one to support him recently 2 of his important men left his party. He is getting alone.
 
The former PAK General is trying to keep himself in limelight by making such comments. Afterall I heard that he is trying for a come back!!!
 
US assets would have been compromised in the region as well as the closest US allies.

Do you know why US is at mercy of Iran and N. Korea because both Israel and S. Korea are the targets of a massive destruction from the opposition even thought they will also get pounded 3x but they will inflict a deep wound on S.Korea and Iran on Israel.

musharraf is nothing but a barking dog who has no one to support him recently 2 of his important men left his party. He is getting alone.

S.Korea itself is an economic powerhouse, i am sure with the money they have, the tehncology and US help, they could well be able to contain starving N.Korea whose people would have revolted against the gov in any chance they had. As per Israel, it is the regional superpowr, have money, committed populatrion and they have won all wars with a few exceptions, they are in a position to defend themselves against any agreesion. Secondly, we are talking agbout Pakistan, what could Paksitan do to defend itself had the US decided to bomb you to a stone age?
 
would you rather loose the whole military nearly a million with innocent lives or 45,000 people?
i think musharraf did the right thing. anyone in his position would've done the same thing!
 
S.Korea itself is an economic powerhouse, i am sure with the money they have, the tehncology and US help, they could well be able to contain starving N.Korea whose people would have revolted against the gov in any chance they had. As per Israel, it is the regional superpowr, have money, committed populatrion and they have won all wars with a few exceptions, they are in a position to defend themselves against any agreesion. Secondly, we are talking agbout Pakistan, what could Pakistan do to defend itself had the US decided to bomb you to a stone age?

What is stopping S.Koreans for the past 58 Years? Thus your statement is invalid.

Isreal as you call it whatever it is can't seem to take charge and get over the dispute over Iranian nuclear program, Again your statement invalid nullified.

Read my previous post, If US can't bomb Iran that hasn't even got a single nuclear bomb to stone age then Pakistan can well survive and its call mind games by US.
These bullying statements have come from India since 1947 as well here we alive and kicking.
 
S.Korea itself is an economic powerhouse, i am sure with the money they have, the tehncology and US help, they could well be able to contain starving N.Korea whose people would have revolted against the gov in any chance they had. As per Israel, it is the regional superpowr, have money, committed populatrion and they have won all wars with a few exceptions, they are in a position to defend themselves against any agreesion. Secondly, we are talking agbout Pakistan, what could Paksitan do to defend itself had the US decided to bomb you to a stone age?

Firstly Israel is only a superpower coz it gets super $$ from the USA. When there is no more $$ then the superpower will be supercr*p. Soon the USA are going to look after number 1 and the charity will stop Then we will see what happens to zionism.
Secondly why are you so obsessed with what Pakistan would have done if they were bombed to a stone age? Do you get a buzz repeating yourself with the same rubbish. It didnt happen and it wouldnt happen so lets move on.
 
What is stopping S.Koreans for the past 58 Years? Thus your statement is invalid.

Isreal as you call it whatever it is can't seem to take charge and get over the dispute over Iranian nuclear program, Again your statement invalid nullified.

Read my previous post, If US can't bomb Iran that hasn't even got a single nuclear bomb to stone age then Pakistan can well survive and its call mind games by US.
These bullying statements have come from India since 1947 as well here we alive and kicking.

Lets dont mix many things, leave south korea in place, even if there is a war there, South might have advantage over hungry north, but lets dont go to that place. Iran is having oil, everyboy needs them thats how they are survivbing, they dont bomb it perhaps they know there is no right time for now. but things were diffent in case of 9/11, the US public opinion would havfe 100% guaranteed the ivasion of pakistan at least from a distance and dont forget that economic crises hadnet started at that point. in case of israel and iran, iran is categorically denyhing that it is developing nuclear weapons, it is saying they are only tryhing to use it for civilian purposes, on the other hand israel is having hundreds of nuke heads along with advanced delivery systems, billionaire jews are among the others who support the state of israel with whole heart. Now, the main qwuestion is about paksitan, what could pakistan possibly do in order to defend itsefl against the might of america? please dont remind of the nukes you have, tell me specifically how you could defend your self?
 
If all this siding with the US was Musharraf's fault, then he has been out of power for quite a while now- whe has no one stood up to the US in the last couple of years and told them where to get off? if members are to be believed, Pakistan's relations with China are at an all time high, so you would have the requistie supprot as well for your actions.

The fact is that Pakistan's psyche as a nation has been completely crushed by your ruling elite over the years to such an extent that your country is constantly looking for crutches to stand on. When you realised that the US is not on your side any longer, you are just trying to supplant them with China- so much for all the bravado one hears on this forum.

I know these are bitter words, but you folks should do some introspection, esp the ones who are still in pakistan. Bravado from internet warriors sitting in US/UK/Canada is all very well, but it is the people on the ground in Pakistan that are bearing the brunt of this day in and day out.
 
u ask why musharraf policy was not changed, david milliband, rice brokered an agreement between musharraf and this ruling party. these guys slaves of the west r here bcoz of u.s.

TARIQ
 
India was on a diplomatic offensive against Pakistan after the 9/11 , which contributed to international perception that it was a sponsor of terror. However India would not have militarily gone against Pakistan for a terrorist attack in a foreign country.

It was good the Musharraf decided to co-operate and renounce links with the Taleban else American wrath would have fallen on Pakistan along with Afghanistan. "Bombing back to the stone age" was perhaps a tad dramatic but back then and perhaps even now , U.S had the resources to take over Pakistani nukes with Pakistan able to do nothing about it. Something that other regional forces eg. India did not .
 
lol They lost war against Vietnam... destablized Iraq and last made exit strategy... and lost bloody war against talibans in Afghanistan... send Pakistan to stonge age ?? LOLZZzzzzz

Enuf of The Pakistanis citing vietnam and Iraq and all.
If USA Wud hve treated all the above mentioned wars just to destroy thru Nukes just like the Pakistanis threaten to use their new found nukes (as compared to US) then all these wars wud have been history.
Only fault US has is to inject some intelligence in the uneducated,wid sme patience,while all the time it had the capabilty to destroy all the above mentioned including the Pakistanis.
 
As per musharaf's own account, a high profile US diplomat had warned Pakistan, "side with us or with the terrorists, if you side with them, we will bomb you to stone age", now what is the capability of Pakistan striking a nuclear attack on the US as many members here are so keen the nuclear option in here.

ah they cant beat 15000 so called terrorists and how are they going to fight against a army of 700,000, and WHOLE Pakistan would be behind our army. that was not the case in Iraq so that is why Iraq got destroyed.

plus look, usa doesnt have the balls to attack Iran.

---------- Post added at 02:56 PM ---------- Previous post was at 02:53 PM ----------

all these wars have been fought away from their home territory , and war is not just about weapons , it also about knowing the geography , if pakistan would have said no to U.S , then u.s would have gone on an all out war with pakistan with the help of india , so it was next to impossible for pakistan

wrong, usa cant do sh!t on its own, they need NATO, 28 countries to help them, usa would be history is they had to fight on their own.
 
Back
Top Bottom