Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I think Bangladesh and Sri Lanka urgently need to build nuclear WMD, so that they can deter any such attacking plan from anyone. Only then aggressive wars will be avoided.
I think Bangladesh and Sri Lanka urgently need to build nuclear WMD, so that they can deter any such attacking plan from anyone. Only then aggressive wars will be avoided.
Can you give me an example of a non aggressive war ?
Wars by nature are (ought) to be aggressive.
Kindly publish the email-address of Mr. AQ Khan for a quick ready-made solution.
^^^^
Yes, hope for more nuclear weapon states in our neighbourhood, that'll be great for South Asian security!!
I can also say with authority that in 1999 our nuclear capability was not yet operational. Saturday May 30, 2009, Islamabad
"Without nuclear power, Pakistan would have not survived after Kargil, Indian Parliament and Mumbai incident episodes," he said addressing the fourth Convocation of the Institute of Space Technology (IST) in Islamabad.
Yeah he wrote it AFTER KARGIL.We said during Kargil that our nukes are ready just to scare the enemy.War is deception .“I can also say with authority that in 1999 our nuclear capability was not yet operational. “
-General Pervez Musharraf - In the Line of Fire
You can try whichever Email you want, I told the only confirmed source of N-TTech up for Sale. Only person who has confessed it and blames his govt. for being a part of the proliferation. If you have such high regards for Dr. Khan, then please don't deny when he tell about the Army and govt. being part of the scandal instead of calling him criminal.You do realize India it self did not invent the nukes and Help was given to them and is being given now even though India is not a signatory of NPT and Americans went ahead and signed the nuclear agreement with India simply showing double slandered of the west.DR AQ khan bad DR George bush good
Although I find the response unrelated to my post, since you have quoted I'll respond.
All the nuclear deal goes to show is that India is far more responsible with its Nuclear Technology than Pakistan, Atleast this is was US thinks, you are entitled to your opinion. If my memory serves me right, India did it's first test in 1974 and had the technology was aquired before the NPT
So what the west is basically saying is if we give out the nuclear tech to whom we like its ok but if others do the same its Very bad thing so as far as i am concerned DR khan did what others have been doing for a long long time if its ok for them to do it there is no problem with DR khan doing it either.
If you are uncomfortable with what west thinks, take it out on some US /UK forum. Welcom to the real world, The rules are never same for everyone.
Dr. khans provided tech has not killed anybody Americans provided cluster bombs fighter jets tank and other ammo is still killing people in Palestine and Lebanon being one example should not we be asking the email addy of those people who are actually contributing to the deaths of 1oos of 1000s or that a no go area as that will makes real culprit look like one.
Another rant about bias of the west. All I mentiones was that Dr. Khan is providing N-Tech in open market, if you can deny then speak up else ....
How bout the email addy of the Americans who helped Agni 111 actually fly or email addy of European countries that provided Israel with nukes including missiles.how many billions/yr are earned by American and European countries selling arms some time with TOT is that any different or it's not sexy non the less same thing so i suggest in future think about it before U ask for the addy.
I can also say with authority that in 1999 our nuclear capability was not yet operational.
-General Pervez Musharraf - In the Line of Fire