What's new

Pak seeks Muslim representation in UNSC

.
The UNSC representation is a shambles. Five nations have veto powers and are permanent, and rest rotate on a two or three year basis and no veto power.

What would be fairer, would be that every country is allowed to rotate through for a certain period of time and every country is allowed a Veto. And also no permanent members. But they who created the UN ain't gonna allow for this as they would lose their advantage.
 
. .
Then change UN charter.
UNSC articles also say that the Supreme power when it comes to War and Peace is the UNSC. Now what happened to Allah being the Supreme Law, at least for Muslims?
 
. .
The UN expansion requirements as charted by CFR is only criteria based and religion is not one of them.

Plain and simple.
 
. . . . .
UNSC articles also say that the Supreme power when it comes to War and Peace is the UNSC. Now what happened to Allah being the Supreme Law, at least for Muslims?

UN charter says it is supreme in resolving issues related to war and conflicts. It doesn't call itself a supreme authority like Allah.
 
.
UN charter says it is supreme in resolving issues related to war and conflicts. It doesn't call itself a supreme authority like Allah.
So if the UNSC came up with a resolution that is against Quran and Ahadith in matters of war and peace, all members of the UNSC would have to accept it? Or can the Muslim country say, sorry this resolution is against this verse of the Quran so we cannot accept it??
It does not have to call itself supreme like Allah, just try to act like him that is all...
 
. . .
So if the UNSC came up with a resolution that is against Quran and Ahadith in matters of war and peace, all members of the UNSC would have to accept it? Or can the Muslim country say, sorry this resolution is against this verse of the Quran so we cannot accept it??
It does not have to call itself supreme like Allah, just try to act like him that is all...

UNSC won't be dealing in issues of Sharia. It would be dealing with conflicts between various countries.

If it would be passing resolution against a muslim country then at least we would have someone from our own to veto that.

Why are you confusing such a simple issue?
 
.

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom