What's new

Pak seeks Muslim representation in UNSC

Thats Pak POV.

This 'valid' attempt goes against the fundamentals of the UN Charter - No religious groups

Were asking for the charter to be changed to account for over 50 countries and 1/4 of humanity

Just as other countries are asking for changes to be made to SC

we need buddhist, jewish, hindu, zoroastrian represensation too then

Too small
 
.
UNSC won't be dealing in issues of Sharia. It would be dealing with conflicts between various countries.

If it would be passing resolution against a muslim country then at least we would have someone from our own to veto that.

Why are you confusing such a simple issue?
Sharia also has laws about war and peace. Or do you think the Sharia is just inheritance and marriage and divorce and prayer and fasting?

It would be good to get a Muslim country as a permanent veto power, or rather let everyone have a rotating veto and no permanent veto. But it will be difficult. As the system is a set up for the big powers....
 
.
Nation with largest Muslim population headed by Hindus and Muslim nation state is quite different in concept..
Indians might elect a Muslim as their PM in near future.

Therefore country with large Muslim population stands a better chance of getting UNSC seat :p:
 
.
Were asking for the charter to be changed to account for over 50 countries and 1/4 of humanity

Just as other countries are asking for changes to be made to SC



Too small
It would be a good idea, but should a large Muslim country like Indonesia or Pakistan, get a veto power. It will be the day when WW III is raging on....
 
. .
Indians might elect a Muslim as their PM in near future.

Therefore country with large Muslim population stands a better chance of getting UNSC seat :p:
You didn't get it..Whatever the case india will remain Hindu Majority nation not otherwise...Yes ,if in another century facts changes then no issue but till then
 
. .
There should be a permanent veto yielding seat for Muslims in security council, held by Pakistan for obvious reasons. This will remove a lot of justifications to invade and trample the Muslim lands in future by other powers like America.
 
.
There should be a permanent veto yielding seat for Muslims in security council, held by Pakistan for obvious reasons. This will remove a lot of justifications to invade and trample the Muslim lands in future by other powers like America.

How do you implement such a change ? Will p5 pass the change unanimously ?
 
.
There should be a permanent veto yielding seat for Muslims in security council, held by Pakistan for obvious reasons. This will remove a lot of justifications to invade and trample the Muslim lands in future by other powers like America.

Too bad rest of the world, does not see 'Muslim' as a nation. Unfortunately for you, name of the organisation is United Nations organisation.

But hey Pakistan can setup another United "religion" organisation, where each religion has permanent representation, and Muslims can have two, (one permanently reserved for Pakistani Muslims) since they think, they are so special.
 
.
lol country with a GDP per capita less than $2000, horrible standards of living and pathetic levels of literacy rate getting a UNSC seat... that's like giving one to India. UNSC shouldnt be a place for losers
 
.
lol country with a GDP per capita less than $2000, horrible standards of living and pathetic levels of literacy rate getting a UNSC seat... that's like giving one to India. UNSC shouldnt be a place for losers
there are above 50 muslim nations some of them way more better your amphibious shithole lanka
they can sure take the seat
 
.
If there was a single country called "Muslim" with 1.5 billion Muslim inhabitants, sure it would valid argument for the permanent seat.

But here we have 54 small countries, who each elect/have their own representative. So how can elected representative of one nation with a population 200 million , claim that, he speaks for all 1.5 billion Muslims?
 
.
If there was a single country called "Muslim" with 1.5 billion Muslim inhabitants, sure it would valid argument for the permanent seat.

But here we have 54 small countries, who each elect/have their own representative. So how can elected representative of one nation with a population 200 million , claim that, he speaks for all 1.5 billion Muslims?

How do the five permanent members represent the entire globe? Indian jackals are penny wise pound foolish.
 
.
This is a poor attempt to obfuscate the claims of Brazil, SA, India, Germany ( ?) to seats in the UNSC

This is the problem. There's no set criteria on how to expand the UNSC to make it more representative. Geography, population, economic status, etc. The debate is endless. This also assumes that existing P5 want to add members when, in reality, they do not. This game has been going on for years and I see no chances of changing anytime soon.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom