Pak Nuclear Scientists And Their Anti-India Ideology

[HAIDER]

Hussain Haqqani , a reporter, then Jamati spokesman , PMLn spokesman, PPP spokesman and found opportunist ....few decades ago , he was rolling in Karachi streets on his Honda seventy....

 

[Samlee]

Can you rebut any of his factual statements?

For An Indian I Guess Anyone Who Talks Trash About Pakistan Is Factual.For Example Tarek Fattah Is Always Factual For An Indian Right??????

https://defence.pk/threads/india-will-disintegrate-tarek-fatah.427593/


Or Is He Only "factual" When He Talks Trash About Pakistan?????

Or Is It That Indians Only Listen What They Want To Listen

Question is does Pakistani Nuclear program was due to the response of the Indian Nuclear Program, or it was already running that program, financed by few rich countries, backed by a notorious comunist country, and a person who you proudly hailed Mr. Khan who is PHD in Metallurgy, was stealing the blue prints for the manufacture of enriched uranium from a Dutch laboratory in 1972 and who made 13 visit to the North Korea.

1.Pakistan Had A Completely Civillian Nuclear Program Under PAEC Led By Dr Muneer.The 1971 War And Subsequent Dismemberment Was Fresh In The Minds Of All Pakistanis So When India Conducted Smiling Buddha,It Was An Unacceptable Scenario For Pakistan Nuclear Bomb Became A Matter Of Life and Death.
2.Dr A.Q Khan Was Not Spy For Pakistan He Was Simple Metallurgical Engineer Pursuing His Career.In 1970s He Applied For A Job At Pakistan Steel Mills But When His Resume Reached Bhutto Which Included His Experience in Uranium Enrichment,Bhutto Wrote To Him And A Meeting Was Set Up Thus Started Pakistan Modern Nuclear Program.
3.Your Prithvi srbm Was A Copy Of Soviet Scud Missiles,Your First SLV Was A Copy Of NASA Scout Vehicle,You Had Taken Your SLV 3 Was Tested In The Tunnels Of German DLR,Your Mark 2 On Board Navigation Computer Was a Motorolla Rip Off,You Borrowed Nuclear Fuel From Canada And Diverted It For Military Purposes And Yet You Have The Audacity To Accuse Dr AQ Khan Of Things That Your Country Has Shamelessly Done In The Past

 

[Hamza913]

The word c*nt does not even begin to describe this tw@t

 

[fitpOsitive]

Mir Jafar of recent times.

 

[Salik]

Bangladesh doesn't have nukes but what is deterring India to make a move on BD and annex it with India?

The fact is that Pakistani nukes have no use except you frame it in glass case and watch every morning. Its extra burden on Pakistani economy in the name of imaginary monster 'there is threat to Pakistan'.

There is no threat to Pakistan except our own shortcomings, which our previous gen tried to fill through nukes. But it didn't help until we realized that we must give people their rights e.g. through18th amendment.

 

[war&peace]

No no...you are mistaken....Pakistani scientists love India...you know they made nukes to provide enough energy to Indian cities in case of a war.

 

[krash]

Bangladesh doesn't have nukes but what is deterring India to make a move on BD and annex it with India?

The fact is that Pakistani nukes have no use except you frame it in glass case and watch every morning. Its extra burden on Pakistani economy in the name of imaginary monster 'there is threat to Pakistan'.

There is no threat to Pakistan except our own shortcomings, which our previous gen tried to fill through nukes. But it didn't help until we realized that we must give people their rights e.g. through18th amendment.

You do know that Bangladesh is a vassal of India.......? Not to mention the fact that you have a MAJOR outstanding territorial issue with India (unlike Bangladesh) where it occupies a sizeable portion of Pakistani claimed Kashmir and eyes the large of swath of land we affectionately call Gilgit Baltistan and AJK due to which both the countries are openly hostile towards each other, have amassed armies on the border more than a couple of times and have already fought THREE bleepin wars, one of which resulted in the very creation of Bangladesh..............

As much as I respect the 'cool' in your hipster wisdom I still gotto ask; What cup of tea have you been drinking my friend?

 

[Hakikat ve Hikmet]

Bangladesh doesn't have nukes but what is deterring India to make a move on BD and annex it with India?

The fact is that Pakistani nukes have no use except you frame it in glass case and watch every morning. Its extra burden on Pakistani economy in the name of imaginary monster 'there is threat to Pakistan'.

There is no threat to Pakistan except our own shortcomings, which our previous gen tried to fill through nukes. But it didn't help until we realized that we must give people their rights e.g. through18th amendment.

With all due respect, do you want to insult BD? BD has bent her back so much to India that from 2 legged homo sapiens she has become 4 legged "homo slavien". She has no further room to bend. IMHO and no bad feelings to anyone, without nukes, Pak will become "homo oblivion"...

Even the Turkish folks understood this reality. According to A Q Khan, he got some parts through Istanbul..

 

[Salik]

You do know that Bangladesh is a vassal of India.......? Not to mention the fact that you have a MAJOR outstanding territorial issue with India (unlike Bangladesh) where it occupies a sizeable portion of Pakistani claimed Kashmir and eyes the large of swath of land we affectionately call Gilgit Baltistan and AJK due to which both the countries are openly hostile towards each other, have amassed armies on the border more than a couple of times and have already fought THREE bleepin wars, one of which resulted in the very creation of Bangladesh..............

Before Indian aggression and intentions being vassal is not enough . India must put its foot in Bangladesh and mount its flag on her soil. You know India is expert in creating stories and characters like 'Ajmal The Butcher' then why no attempt on BD? Oh ummah thing will wake up in Muslims and they'll rescue one Muslim country member of UN. But not in our case.

If India tries to occupy AJK and Gilgit Baltistan it will vindicate UN resolution on Kashmir. The least thing India will want to happen. India has maintained status quo, its Pakistan that has made several attempts. So nukes have zero role in this matter.

Its wrong that one of the wars with India created Bangladesh. Accidents don't happen all of a sudden. Lets say India had 10% role in the creation of BD, are you ready to accept 90% responsibility?

With all due respect, do you want to insult BD? BD has bent her back so much to India that from 2 legged homo sapiens she has become 4 legged "homo slavien". She has no further room to bend. IMHO and no bad feelings to anyone, without nukes, Pak will become "homo oblivion"...

Even the Turkish folks understood this reality. According to A Q Khan, he got some parts through Istanbul..

As they say 'nakal ke liye bhi akal ki zaroorat hoti he' (one needs brains even to copy). One phone call from America and Mr. Musharraf became 4 legged "homo slavien" in front of America. Pakistan got nukes but didn't know how to utilize this power. If Pakistan would know lot of regional and global problems would've been solved, many wouldn't have been even initiated.

 

[krash]

Before Indian aggression and intentions being vassal is not enough . India must put its foot in Bangladesh and mount its flag on her soil. You know India is expert in creating stories and characters like 'Ajmal The Butcher' then why no attempt on BD? Oh ummah thing will wake up in Muslims and they'll rescue one Muslim country member of UN. But not in our case.

Why would India ever invade Bangladesh when it is already its posse? What is there that India wants to gain from Bangladesh? You think Pakistan is afraid of Indian expansionism?

If India tries to occupy AJK and Gilgit Baltistan it will vindicate UN resolution on Kashmir. The least thing India will want to happen.

UN resolution?

Let's forget for a little while the stellar role that the resolution has played thus far in Kashmir or Golan Heights or Crimea (which btw aren't even disputed), pray do tell me what will the vindication of the UN resolution have for Pakistan? Or for the Kashmiris? Or anyone for that matter......What will there be stopping India from claiming AJK and GB? From annexing the whole of Kashmir? The fear of a snide comment from a Pakistani such as you? "Ha! The UN resolutions have been vindicated! We have won the moral victory".....?

India has maintained status quo, its Pakistan that has made several attempts. So nukes have zero role in this matter.

Damn right we have! It is our land. We will keep fighting for it till kingdom come, make no mistake. Are you proposing that we do not? What do you think is stopping India from neutering our ability to still keep the Kashmir issue alight? If India does not want to neuter Pakistan to gain AJK and GB it most definitely does want it to finally convert the LOC into an international border and swallow IOK.

I haven't even touched the water issue or India's hegemonic aspirations yet.

Its wrong that one of the wars with India created Bangladesh. Accidents don't happen all of a sudden. Lets say India had 10% role in the creation of BD, are you ready to accept 90% responsibility?

What are you even talking about? I mean no offence, but how old are you?

May the blame lay 99% on us but would that absolve India of its intentions in the conflict? Kindly focus on what you're trying to debate. The way India's been fuelling the militant insurgency in two of your provinces, do you think its the fear of facing morally superior snappy remarks that's stopping India to attempt another 1971?

So please do enlighten us, why and how India is not a threat to Pakistan's sovereignty?

Like I said, what cup of tea have you been drinking my friend?

 

[Salik]

Why would India ever invade Bangladesh when it is already its posse? What is there that India wants to gain from Bangladesh?

Bangladesh had been proper part of India as compared to Northwest area of sub-continent. Why would India not want to regain its lost part.

Another example, Pakistan is feeding Afghanistan directly in shape of refugees and indirectly in shape of trade. What is deterring Pakistan to go into Afghanistan and hunt the wanted terrorist? My friend there is de facto barrier and deterrent that no country invades and captures another country.

UN resolution?

Let's forget for a little while the stellar role that the resolution has played thus far in Kashmir or Golan Heights or Crimea (which btw aren't even disputed), pray do tell me what will the vindication of the UN resolution have for Pakistan? Or for the Kashmiris? Or anyone for that matter......What will there be stopping India from claiming AJK and GB? From annexing the whole of Kashmir? The fear of a snide comment from a Pakistani such as you? "Ha! The UN resolutions have been vindicated! We have won the moral victory".....?



Damn right we have! It is our land. We will keep fighting for it till kingdom come, make no mistake. Are you proposing that we do not? What do you think is stopping India from neutering our ability to still keep the Kashmir issue alight? If India does not want to neuter Pakistan to gain AJK and GB it most definitely does want it to finally convert the LOC into an international border and swallow IOK.

Sir either stop talking about UN resolution on Kashmir in every forum or stop taking law into your hands in shape Kargil or Op Jibralter whatever. Double standards won't work. If you have pair of marbel go and get IOK and put Indo-Pak in nuclear holocaust.

India will maintain status quo even it says UN resolutions are ineffective now. Why don't you also maintain status quo and work on diplomatic level.

May the blame lay 99% on us but would that absolve India of its intentions in the conflict? Kindly focus on what you're trying to debate. The way India's been fuelling the militant insurgency in two of your provinces, do you think its the fear of facing morally superior snappy remarks that's stopping India to attempt another 1971?

Its dangerous, you won't accept 99% resposibility and nuke a country for 1% role. Mr. Modi rightfully said in Bangladesh that he helped poor Bangalis.

That's why Pakistan said to be a rouge state. No one can save you from another 1971.

 

[Faiez]

I could not read beyond the first 2 paragraphs. Everytime I hear that name, I am inflamed and so I wait impatiently for the Military to hold Kiyani accountable for letting this Bas**** off the hook!!!

All the lies he has written above, the propaganda.....this and a lot of other things could have been avoided had we someone like Raheel Sharif instead of someone like Kiyani at the top. How I rue the missed opportunities and the humiliations we faced during the period of Kiyani.

Agreed !