Pak co undermines PAF for profit

[Javed3]

Dear Sapper:
This forum is not a court and you are not a Magistrate. This forum is a platform for exchange of ideas and info.
As for the particular trading house, you better get your bearings from any Senior level contacts you may have in the Air Headquarters.

 

[Sapper]

Dear Sapper:
This forum is not a court and you are not a Magistrate. This forum is a platform for exchange of ideas and info.
As for the particular trading house, you better get your bearings from any Senior level contacts you may have in the Air Headquarters.

dear ... feed me some facts ... i know you dont believe me but i am 100% comitted to find credible evidence and establish the traitor's identity in my mind. But if you dont havee any facts ... than say that you have heard another rumor and admit it as well.

I am on your side ... i just need more evidence than you do to convince me ... thats all.

 

[DbnReaper]

In my country such an action would be a criminal act against the State. These people should be prosecuted by the Pakistan government

 

[Javed3]

Dear Sapper:
Nobody in this business leaves traceable documents in Public domain. A serious investigation by Government authorities like FIA can decode the sequence. Right now the evidence is circumstantial:

1. Kestral was appointed as agent by competing US defense contractors; almost unprecedented anywhere else. They represented Lockheed Martin, Raytheon, Pratt & Whitney, L-3 Communications at the same time. These contractors were beneficiaries of almost 50% of the total procurement outlay of PAF, and some for the Army. The rest was divided amongst more than 200 agents and brokers.

2. The following major FMS procurement worth about US$ 7.5 b was routed through this ONE Company: Letters of Request (LOR) for various Foreign Military sales (FMS) cases, including the F-16 Block 52's were structured in a way to maximize the commercial benefit, rather than operational justification.
www.dsca.mil/PressReleases/36-b/090303/pakistan_03-18.pdf
http://www.dsca.mil/PressReleases/36-b/090303/pakistan_03-18.pdf
http://www.dsca.mil/PressReleases/36-b/2004/Pakistan_05-06.pdf
http://www.dsca.mil/PressReleases/36-b/2004/Pakistan_05-07.pdf
http://www.dsca.mil/pressreleases/36-b/Pakistan_02-55.pdf
http://www.dsca.mil/PressReleases/36-b/092403/pakistan_03-22.pdf
http://www.dsca.mil/pressreleases/36-b/2006/Pakistan_06-34.pdf
http://www.dsca.mil/PressReleases/36-b/2006/Pakistan_06-11.pdf
http://www.dsca.mil/PressReleases/36-b/2006/Pakistan_06-09.pdf
http://www.dsca.mil/PressReleases/36-b/2008/Pakistan_08-54.pdf
http://www.dsca.mil/pressreleases/36-b/2006/Pakistan_06-10.pdf

3. The only way the PAF leadership could safeguard against the predatory practices of this company was through drastic reduction in the quantum of approved goodies. For instance the F-16 Block 52 case was reduced from about US$ 2 b to less than $ 500 m.