livingdead
ELITE MEMBER
![](/styles/default/xenforo/ranks/General.jpg)
- Joined
- Oct 25, 2011
- Messages
- 22,952
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
- Location
are you implying indian muslims should live separately from hindus then.Ofcourse not. We are a poor country. But we are will still be the last country willing to accept the Dharmic people.
No. Rohingyas are of Bengali origin, which arguably is also Indian origin. So by your line of reasoning Rohingyas which number in millions should be granted asylum in India.
And if Muslims of Indian(broad sense) origin need a place for asylum, they have Pakistan - a country made exclusively for Muslims of South Asia. If that country fails them or refuses them, then they can go to Saudi Arabia for all we care.
And yes, asylum seekers when they number in millions will cause HUGE social complications in whichever area they settle in (if they are of non-Dharmic origin).
While you may be comfortable, I doubt that whichever city you hail from in India - your relatives back here will not be very pleased to suddenly find a million or more sunni rohingyas living next to their city.
So on account of all such facts, we are not obligated to help anyone but those of Dharmic faiths. We should focus our efforts - limited as they are- to people who are relevant to us.
Yes pakistan was made for muslims which is why we should not accept economic migrants from there. But if anybody faces threat to life and manages to come to us, you are saying we will send them back.
We have never done that, and I hope we never do.
BTW lakhs of bangladeshis live in India without issues.