You are damn stubborn. (In a negative way). Aren't you?
Still crying about casualties after being debunked over and over again.
You believe him because you want to. Not because he is in your words "a source to back your claims".
300 killed.
Camp completely destroyed.
Camp not destroyed, we made holes in the roof and bombs blasted inside.
We don't know how many killed.
Now after all of above anyone who toes the line of hundreds killed is nothing but a liar.
The image is virtually unchanged from an April 2018 satellite photo of the facility. There are no discernible holes in the roofs of buildings, no signs of scorching, blown-out walls, displaced trees around the madrasa or other signs of an aerial attack.
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-...standing-at-indian-bombing-site-idUSKCN1QN00V
In face of all other reputable papers, you bring one obscure journalist who has neither visited Pak nor has assessed satellite photos. And then you say " we both have sources to back up our claims". As if your source is of any substance.
Even if there were casualties, it's still a shame that a madrassa full of children was targeted by a professional force. You OTOH seem to be very proud of it.
You seem to be though.
Despite the failure of strikes, you have HT and ANI sources to back you up which are sufficient for you.
It's not an Indian brand. None of the top ten brands is Indian.