What's new

PAF Air chief's message to Indian military attache

ہم خوش ہو رہے ہیں اسی خوشی میں ہمارا آئنہ ہے، ہم دعوی کرتے ہیں وطن کی حدود کے دفاع کا کیا ہم کرتے ہیں کیا ہم نے شمالی حصے کا کیا یا مغربی کا، کیا کبھی روس یا امریکا کے کسی صحافی کی اتنی ہمت ہوئی وہ دوسرے ملک کے سالار سے پوچھے ہم آئیں گے تم روک نہیں سکو گے، ہم کچھ اپنے اور کچھ دشمن کے پروپیگنڈے میں ہیں اس طرح کے سوال پر تو ملکوں میں سانسیں رک جاتی ہیں ، اور ہم بس خوش ہیں، شکریہ
 
.
1965 war was a major defeat for Pakistan as it failed to achieve a single objective.
1948 & 1999 were Pakistani defeats too.

Get your facts right, it was India who attacked on International Borders with aim of capturing Lahore and cutting Pakistan into 02 did India achieved it?? What was IAF losses compared to PAF, a 07 times larger nation is continuously beaten by small nation and only won war by interfering in East Pakistan by using proxies (creating civil war situation), we get Kashmir in 1948 without using proper army in1948 it's our victory not defeat and I have personally seen things how India was beaten in Kagil, your troops we're begging for food in Siachin that was the state of supplies there.
 
.
Get your facts right, it was India who attacked on International Borders with aim of capturing Lahore and cutting Pakistan into 02 did India achieved it?? What was IAF losses compared to PAF, a 07 times larger nation is continuously beaten by small nation and only won war by interfering in East Pakistan by using proxies (creating civil war situation), we get Kashmir in 1948 without using proper army in1948 it's our victory not defeat and I have personally seen things how India was beaten in Kagil, your troops we're begging for food in Siachin that was the state of supplies there.

India opened western border since pakistan deployed its troops in kashmir so we had to open western border to release pressure. Btw, what is your continuous victory till now even if we leave case of east pakistan ?
You got kashmir in 1948 because there was no indian army there, india interfered only when pakistan reached very well inside and after the appeal of Hari Singh. and for kargil war ? Read it here ...
https://www.dawn.com/news/204768
how many troops you lost ? Even were not ready to accept that its your army fighting in kargil.
Btw, india transports its supply to siachin by Air not by Road you idiot.
 
.
India opened western border since pakistan deployed its troops in kashmir so we had to open western border to release pressure. Btw, what is your continuous victory till now even if we leave case of east pakistan ?
You got kashmir in 1948 because there was no indian army there, india interfered only when pakistan reached very well inside and after the appeal of Hari Singh. and for kargil war ? Read it here ...
https://www.dawn.com/news/204768
how many troops you lost ? Even were not ready to accept that its your army fighting in kargil.
Btw, india transports its supply to siachin by Air not by Road you idiot.

07 times larger India was not able to handle things on Line of Actual Contact so it crossed International border in 1965, also in 1999 India was not able to handle few hundred guerilla fighters who were supported by 100K PA troops against 700K IA and India brought full air and land Force to face them, who is failure here??
 
.
07 times larger India was not able to handle things on Line of Actual Contact so it crossed International border in 1965, also in 1999 India was not able to handle few hundred guerilla fighters who were supported by 100K PA troops against 700K IA and India brought full air and land Force to face them, who is failure here??

1)What do you mean by 7 times larger ? if 7 times larger is the concept then Arabs wud have swallowed israel long time ago. India attacked lahore due to heavy concentration of pak army armor in kashmir.
Btw in 1971, why did you attack indian western border ? So that pak forces in east pakistan gets some relief.

2)Few hundred ? There were more than 5000 soldiers stationed there on heights by pakistan. Do you think your general will put 400-500 soldiers on heights and take on india ? How many gone back ? This is what you need to see.

3) Why are you clearing your militant hide outs in S.W or N.W by using your airforce ? why not send your army directly there? why did you use your tanks against militants ? Is it a failure of pak army who cant face rag tag militants ?
 
.
Jammy, have you seen Border or Gazi attack? Any pakistani movie with such quality? or you guys dont make movies and watch our movies only?
lol.gif
:lol::lol::lol::lol:

@waz @Oscar Why dont we have emoji with India flag? what it the problem when we have these with chini and pakistani flag?
Well, I think we need a few more emojis, 4-5 flags should be added (1) Turkey (2) Russia (3) India (4) KSA (5) Sweden :p:
 
.
1)What do you mean by 7 times larger ? if 7 times larger is the concept then Arabs wud have swallowed israel long time ago. India attacked lahore due to heavy concentration of pak army armor in kashmir.
Btw in 1971, why did you attack indian western border ? So that pak forces in east pakistan gets some relief.

2)Few hundred ? There were more than 5000 soldiers stationed there on heights by pakistan. Do you think your general will put 400-500 soldiers on heights and take on india ? How many gone back ? This is what you need to see.

3) Why are you clearing your militant hide outs in S.W or N.W by using your airforce ? why not send your army directly there? why did you use your tanks against militants ? Is it a failure of pak army who cant face rag tag militants ?

Create new thread to discuss this.
 
.
Bloody hell ACM S aman is a legend and I know we'll (at least ) me will remember him for a long time.
Thank you sir , we need more people like you in this country.
 
.
Get your facts right, it was India who attacked on International Borders with aim of capturing Lahore and cutting Pakistan into 02 did India achieved it?? What was IAF losses compared to PAF, a 07 times larger nation is continuously beaten by small nation and only won war by interfering in East Pakistan by using proxies (creating civil war situation), we get Kashmir in 1948 without using proper army in1948 it's our victory not defeat and I have personally seen things how India was beaten in Kagil, your troops we're begging for food in Siachin that was the state of supplies there.
Crossing intermational border was a master stroke as it forced Pakistan to abandon Kashmir offensive.
Whatever parts of Kashmir Pakistan captured in 1948 were before Indian Army stepped into Kashmir.
LMAO if our troops were starving in Siachen during Kargil, how did they capture the highest position in siachen from your SSG during the war?
 
. . .

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom