Outrageous: Tailor sued for not stitching pockets

[ghazi52]

..................................
Outrageous: Tailor sued for not stitching pockets

LAHORE: A tailor was issued a notice by a consumer court on Friday for stitching a bad suit in 2014. The disgruntled customer has demanded Rs300,000 as damages saying that the tailor had “ruined” his Eid celebrations. Petitioner Muhammad Umar said he gave Arif, the proprietor of DEAF Tailors, Ravi Road, cloth to stitch three shalwar and kamees in 2014. He said he had asked Arif to stitch two pockets on each kamees but when he received the suits, there were no pockets on the kamees. “That ruined my Eid celebrations,” he said. Umar said he complained about the defect to Arif who told him that he was busy with his own Eid preparations and could not stitch pockets on them. Umar asked the court to direct Arif to pay him Rs300,000 as damages for that.

Published in The Express Tribune, August 1st, 2015.

.................

 

[MastanKhan]

..................................
Outrageous: Tailor sued for not stitching pockets

LAHORE: A tailor was issued a notice by a consumer court on Friday for stitching a bad suit in 2014. The disgruntled customer has demanded Rs300,000 as damages saying that the tailor had “ruined” his Eid celebrations. Petitioner Muhammad Umar said he gave Arif, the proprietor of DEAF Tailors, Ravi Road, cloth to stitch three shalwar and kamees in 2014. He said he had asked Arif to stitch two pockets on each kamees but when he received the suits, there were no pockets on the kamees. “That ruined my Eid celebrations,” he said. Umar said he complained about the defect to Arif who told him that he was busy with his own Eid preparations and could not stitch pockets on them. Umar asked the court to direct Arif to pay him Rs300,000 as damages for that.

Published in The Express Tribune, August 1st, 2015.

.................

Oh well----he could claim that due to his disability---he did not hear the order

 

[livingdead]

300k damage for what?

 

[FaujHistorian]

300k damage for what?

without those pockets he had no place to store his chewing gum.

That ruined his Eid obviously.

 

[JonAsad]

nice- the Pakistani derziz are arrogant incompetent bunch of stupid and lazy people-

we should sue them- if he wins the case- he will set an example and
i will sue my darzi my doodh wala my garden wala my akhbar wala my mechanic even raat ko seetian bajanay wala-

without those pockets he had no place to store his chewing gum.

That ruined his Eid obviously.

Eid and pockets always comes together -
where will he put his eidi in?
Nala khol k in the shalwar every time?-

or or the eidi he has to give who will take the eidi if every time he has to open his nala put his hands inside to get the money?-

 

[Dubious]

nice- the Pakistani derziz are arrogant incompetent bunch of stupid and lazy people-

we should sue them- if he wins the case- he will set an example and
i will sue my darzi my doodh wala my garden wala my akhbar wala my mechanic even raat ko seetian bajanay wala-

janaab haath thora hola rakhain:

he gave Arif, the proprietor of DEAF Tailors, Ravi Road,

he had asked Arif to stitch two pockets on each kamees but when he received the suits, there were no pockets on the kamees.

Talk about arrogance to the tailors...Sure they ruin our clothes they are only human who asks

Rs300,000

from a mazdoor? I mean if he had

Rs300,000

would he be a tailor or a snobbish cross-dresser claiming to be a designer whom the whole world tolerates and calls their mistakes as fashion

Arif who told him that he was busy with his own Eid preparations and could not stitch pockets on them.

 

[Providence]

Oh well----he could claim that due to his disability---he did not hear the order

No not necessary. The amount sounds penalising and the case would be summarily thrown out in the arraignment itself.

Consequential damages needs to be proven. Can't be frivolous.

 

[Dubious]

No not necessary. The amount sounds penalising and the case would be summarily thrown out in the arraignment itself.

Consequential damages needs to be proven. Can't be frivolous.

Have you been to Pakistan?

 

[Providence]

Have you been to Pakistan?

No. But I trust the logic in the most stupidest human mind as well. ( absolutely no offence to general pakistanis )

 

[Dubious]

No. But I trust the logic in the most stupidest human mind as well. ( absolutely no offence to general pakistanis )

The relationship between Logic and corrupt legal systems was proven by JC report

 

[Muhammad Omar]

i should have sued my Tailor too he ruined by dress too.... Pockets were there but he mixed Someone else dress with mine the Hands of Kameez were off white the the rest was white

 

[Super Falcon]

Tailor should have stitched it when he asked him so now tailor should listen carefully to customers

 

[MastanKhan]

No. But I trust the logic in the most stupidest human mind as well. ( absolutely no offence to general pakistanis )

Hi,

Thank you for your post. Pakistani judges are not the brightest bulbs on the chandelier.

 

[untitled]

Wrong tailor
I thought it was Taylor swift
What was I thinking?

 

[kṣamā]

My "Tare Zameen Par" syndrome kicked in and I read "Traitor sued for not stitching Pockets "!!