What's new

Outlawed Pakistan group LeT calls for holy war

Status
Not open for further replies.
.
:) What new thing you want me to post about Freedom Fighting??

In the past Freedom fight was fought with old weapons not sophisticated ones and Now the modern weapones have replaced the old tactics.

Thats new rest the Freedom Fight against the invaders is always the same.

From the day one, your so called fredom fighters are using AK-47,56 gernade lauchchers. Trust me Indian army doest have ak47 in late 80ss
 
.
In the past Freedom fight was fought with old weapons not sophisticated ones and Now the modern weapones have replaced the old tactics.

And then you cry foul, barbarism etc when they get answers in the language they know

d63074be658080829db8db2604e3365c.jpg
 
.
Being Indians you are already supporting TTP against Pakistan. So nah no problem.


:azn:
We do not support terror in any ways. Cross border terrorism is your area of expertise. This Headley guy is going to spill all the beans. lol
 
.
:) Kashmir was Never part of India. Thanks to my tribal Pathan warriors we liberated one part of Kashmir from Indian terrorism.:pakistan:


The rest is being engaged by Kashmiri Freedom fighters.


Not you fault jana, you peple have been fed wrong history during the zia era according to KK Aziz.

Remedy: Crash coure in History morning evening after food.

History of Kashmir

And still if you feel kashmir never belonged to india and indians are invaders so be it and it will always remain that way, our army will send the holy warriors to the holy heaven as usual.
 
.
I think one thread was closed for your such comments.

Anyway, its all about perceptions. Bhagat Singh who along with his friends sacrificed his life selflessly for the independence of British India ( India+Pakistan+BD). The british media always maintained Bhagat Singh as a terrorist. By dictionary definition, He was a terrorist. But from Indian perspective he was a freedom fighter. The same way as Goerge Washington.


So, you may not be thankful to the deed of Saheed Bhagat Singh, but we all are. So lets not pull him to all the threads endlessly.

Now coming back to the topic, the same pathan warriors you mention as holy warriors are termed as terrorists from Indian side. The side you call as Independent Kashmir is called as Pakistan occupied Kashmir in India. The Kashmir this side is called as Indian Occupied Kashmir in Pakistan. The holy warriors of LeTs may be Heros in Pakistan but are termed terrorists this side.

They have been trying to free kashmir for quite a while and I am sure they will keep on doing this. You keep supporting them and we will keep killing them. But in the end its just one thing

Matter of perception.

:agree: Indeed matter of perception because


1. Britishers rightly call Bhagat Singh a terrorist because he and his fellows followed violent methods for freedom.

2. Indians call him freedom fighter despite the fact that Gandhi had opposed him and despite the fact that Indians always show off non-violent methods of Gandhi but Indians do call Bhagat Singh a freedom fighter. Thats your preception because he was fighting against British rule.

Similarly

3. All those Kashmiri freedom fighters who are fighting against Indian occupation of Kashmir are Freedom fighters for us and Kashmiris same as Bhagat Singh for you.

4. Whereas they are 'terrorists' for Indians.


So indeed mattter of preception prevailing throughout the world.
 
.
Not you fault jana, you peple have been fed wrong history during the zia era according to KK Aziz.

Remedy: Crash coure in History morning evening after food.

History of Kashmir

Nah i wasnt born in Zia era so such thing is fed to me.


Kashmir is brutally occupied by India where Indain forces are killing Innocent Kashmiri women, children and youth.


Sorry we dont need Indian trash course about Kashmir
 
.
:agree: Indeed matter of perception because


1. Britishers rightly call Bhagat Singh a terrorist because he and his fellows followed violent methods for freedom.

2. Indians call him freedom fighter despite the fact that Gandhi had opposed him and despite the fact that Indians always show off non-violent methods of Gandhi but Indians do call Bhagat Singh a freedom fighter. Thats your preception because he was fighting against British rule.

Similarly

3. All those Kashmiri freedom fighters who are fighting against Indian occupation of Kashmir are Freedom fighters for us and Kashmiris same as Bhagat Singh for you.

4. Whereas they are 'terrorists' for Indians.


So indeed mattter of preception prevailing throughout the world.

so if according to you the british rightly called bhagat singh a terrorist because he used violant means the kashmiris freedom fighters as you call them are also terrorists because they use violant methods
 
.
Well what are they waiting for......bring it on.....Indians do not differentiate between a good jihadi and a bad jihadi like Pakistan...and there will be a lesser need for India Government to justify their anti-terror operations....... their so called Jihad will be over in not time ...just like Khalistan terrorism.
 
.
We do not support terror in any ways. Cross border terrorism is your area of expertise. This Headley guy is going to spill all the beans. lol

:rofl::rofl: door ka dhol suhanay. Indians are coming up with different excuses the matter of fact is that You have failed to gril Headly for his role and he was US spy no doubt about. Its unlikely of US was not aware of his actions.


And trut me i being a Pakistani dont care if US for saving its skin for roles in Mumbai, would put all the blam on any organisation.

The only ones should be stressed are Indians :) people have came and struck you and you are still looking in only one direction.


As far cross border terrorism, India has many terror camps in Afghanistan for fomenting terror in Pakistan.


Besides India is sheltteriing and funding BLA terrorists since long.


Apart from this India had created world dreaded terrorist Organisation LTTE which had carried terrorism uptill recently.
 
.
:agree: Indeed matter of perception because

1. Britishers rightly call Bhagat Singh a terrorist because he and his fellows followed violent methods for freedom.

Yes they followed violent methods. Where is it mentioned that freedom fighting needs to be non-violent only? Infact, India was the only country ( as per my knowledge) which got independence in non violent method. Even Subhash Chandra Bose also followed violent method and even was successful in occupying a large region in NE India.

2. Indians call him freedom fighter despite the fact that Gandhi had opposed him and despite the fact that Indians always show off non-violent methods of Gandhi but Indians do call Bhagat Singh a freedom fighter. Thats your preception because he was fighting against British rule.

Gandhi definitely believed and followed non-violent method. But, that does not give Gandhi any rights to term anyone anything. That time whole India was occupied and we all know what sort of barbarism was followed by britishers in India. Whoever patriot was there at that time, they followed their own method.

Again a word of perception, Imagine what if, Netaji Bose was successful in throwing british rule out of India? He would have been termed as Father of the Nation and may be today we would have been reading history portraying Gandhi as a coward and a p****.


3. All those Kashmiri freedom fighters who are fighting against Indian occupation of Kashmir are Freedom fighters for us and Kashmiris same as Bhagat Singh for you.

Bhagat Singh ( may god give him heaven), sacrificed also for the piece of land, you call as Pakistan. So, he was a freedom fighter for Pakistanis also.

4. Whereas they are 'terrorists' for Indians.

So indeed mattter of preception prevailing throughout the world.

They indeed are :sniper:
 
.
Well what are they waiting for......bring it on.....Indians do not differentiate between a good jihadi and a bad jihadi like Pakistan...and there will be a lesser need for India Government to justify their anti-terror operations....... their so called Jihad will be over in not time ...just like Khalistan terrorism.


Indian state terrorism does not differentiate beteween innocent people too


India Terrorism in Indian Kashmir
 
.
Sometimes i wonder if people like Bhagat singh just faught for India and had nothing to do with Pakistan........ They dont consider them their freedom fighters and end up comparing them with the banned organizations which have been resposible for spilling terror

Ms. Jana one simple question do you support LeT as they are fighting for the course of Kasmir?
 
.
Being Indians you are already supporting TTP against Pakistan. So nah no problem.


:azn:

Any proof... I hope that at least you can provide some proofs, which your govt. can't.

For me TTP is a terrorist organization. I won't slander freedom fighters by terming these monsters as freedom fighter.
 
.
Nah i wasnt born in Zia era so such thing is fed to me.


Kashmir is brutally occupied by India where Indain forces are killing Innocent Kashmiri women, children and youth.


Sorry we dont need Indian trash course about Kashmir


Oh no you guys do need crash courses in history, KK Aziz was not a fool to write on the distorted history fed to pakistani kids.

Kashmir was is & will always be an integral part of India and neither the pakistan backed militants nor the PA can do anything about it.

Status quo has to be maintained you see.

Lastly our army is ready and we have the money and the will to continue this pakistan backed proxy war for thousands of years. No problem for India.
 
.
Status
Not open for further replies.

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom