VCheng
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Sep 29, 2010
- Messages
- 48,460
- Reaction score
- 57
- Country
- Location
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Induction J10b and integrate more advanced western avionics system on it. That is simple, cheap for PAF with less interest rate burden by loan, with no risk of being sanctioned cause the airframe and engine is made in china.soo the discussion was about the option for PAF against indian MMRCA....
Soo anybody have any sensible suggestion on that other than trolling?
Signed the deal long ago ... I dont know why people are over reacting !Induction J10b and integrate more advanced western avionics system on it. That is simple, cheap for PAF with less interest rate burden by loan, with no risk of being sanctioned cause the airframe and engine is made in china.
Signed the deal long ago ... I dont know why people are over reacting !
Simple Question : Which one will become operational first ? J10 or Rafale ? Has the MMRCA deal even signed yet ?
The J10 deal back in 2007 and they will be delivered by the end of 2013 at worst ( First Squadron ) ...
What does it matter if J10 comes first or Rafale. They'll need quite some time to be fully integrated in the doctrine's of their respective AF's plus their pilots would take quite some time getting used to those birds. In this regard I believe both IAF and PAF would be evenly matched because PF pilots get to train on the Chinese jets whereas IAF with their pilots doing about 200-300 flight hrs per year on their jets would catch up quick.Signed the deal long ago ... I dont know why people are over reacting !
Simple Question : Which one will become operational first ? J10 or Rafale ? Has the MMRCA deal even signed yet ? In the meantime JF17 BlK 2 will keep coming ... Whats the problem then ?
The J10 deal back in 2007 and they will be delivered by the end of 2013 at worst ( First Squadron ) ... Do Indians now consider the Rafale to be more capable than previous " God's gift to Aviation " SU 30 MKI ? What new things does it bring on the table ? We are already developing J2xx with China ...
My post does not suggest that at all, at least not unconditionally - how effective and advanced a net-centric war-fighting capability a military possesses will depend on the number and quality of assets deployed that make up the entire system, as well as how refined and tested the actual doctrine utilizing all those assets to their maximum potential is.1. By above post it looks like PAF can face any force or whole world in defensive mode but that's not the reality.
Not necessarily - the AWAC's and various other ground and air based systems that Pakistan possesses do not require satellite communication in order to be integrated into the overall C4 system.2. And for net centric warfare the most important requirement are:
a.) Dedicated communication satellite which PAF don't have IAF will have by 2014.
Satellite communication, as part of net-centiricity, will be routed through ground or air based C4 systems - as will non-satellite based communication - so in either case one side can disrupt communications of the other by going after the non-satellite based C4 nodes.What will PAf will do if communication is cut off.
Useful for developing intelligence BEFORE hostilities start - I fail to see their use during the course of a short one or two week war. And Pakistan can access satellite imagery from other sources.b.) Dedicated spy satellite which PAF don't have but IAF have.
Hence the shift away from the F-16 as the main fighter platform - but that said, the PAF was able to keep the F-16's flying through almost a decade of US sanctions, and has enough spare parts to keep them flying during the course of a short war.3. You are not ignoring:
a.) Dependance on USA for spares etc.
Science Fiction, and unsubstantiated.b.) Kill switch in F 16s
How will it blind the PAF? The PAF is not planning on flying around the world - it is going to be deployed primarily in Pakistani airspace and perhaps across the IB in Indian air space during the course of a war, and Pakistani pilots did just fine landing their aircraft during past wars when they did not have GPS capability in their air-craft.c.) Blinding of PAF by USA through denial of GPS as they have done it in Iraq.
Yes, after about 200 deleted posts.So has this thread been reopened
Thanks. We all here keep complaining about how the mods are biased, how they aren't competent enough, blah blah blah blahYes, after about 200 deleted posts.