What's new

Open war in the South China Sea

1. More than half of Mongolian around the world are Chinese;
2. The cradle of Mongolian is in China;
3. The direct posterity of the Great Khan (Golden Family) are all Chinese;
4. Mongolian were one of the founders of the Republic.

Common sense.

If this is a delusion, then calling Akbar an Indian is also a delusion.


that is non-sense, not common sense...... Mongolians and chinese are two different races.... They formed united dynasty.....
 
"Old Prussian" was German.

Mongolia and Manchu never ruled a country named "China", such as Prussia never ruled a country named "Germany".



Mongolian and Manchus are Chinese, Yuan and Qing are Chinese history. They did nothing for you.



Vietnam => lost the whole country from China, France.
India (Big country)= > lost the whole country from Britain, France, Portugal.
China (Big country)= > lost cities of HK, Macau and other ports.

They all failed expect for Khalkha, willing you said.



Yup.



There was not such a country called "China" during that time.
Today Macedonia is an independent country too, so?



Still better than those countries lost their whole territories for vlt.
Besides, HK was "rent", but the others were "conquered".
Also there are territories of Argentina and Spain still under control of the UK nowadays.

Very hilarious argument.
What can we say in English about the history of the area of land in Asia as called in English "China" to day ? It mean "the China", this country doesn't existed in time when Mongoian and Manchus were Emperors there, there was Yuan and Man Qing countries, it's truth. :rofl:
 
Wait, so US occupied the current borders less than 300 years, beat the native, put them in reservations, and it currently contains almost all known race on earth in US society. What are are you trying to say?
 
that is non-sense, not common sense...... Mongolians and chinese are two different races.... They formed united dynasty.....

Mongolian (more than half of) are belong to the Chinese ethnic groups.
Your comment will be accepted if it was written as "Han/Manchurian and Mongolian are two different races".

Very hilarious argument.
What can we say in English about the history of the area of land in Asia as called in English "China" to day ? It mean "the China", this country doesn't existed in time when Mongoian and Manchus were Emperors there, there was Yuan and Man Qing countries, it's truth. :rofl:

There were not such country called "Germany", but "ancient German Nations";
There were not such country called "India", but "ancient Indian Nations";
There were not such country called "China", but "ancient Chinese Nations"

Get it?
 
Mongolian (more than half of) are belong to the Chinese ethnic groups.

That doesn't deny that a country now named "china" which was defeated by the Mongols; and Mongolians ruled over the Han Chinese on a land they named "Yuan Dynasty" (China today).

That can't be changed with any perspective.
 
That doesn't deny that a country now named "china" which was defeated by the Mongols; and Mongolians ruled over the Han Chinese on a land they named "Yuan Dynasty" (China today).

That can't be changed with any perspective.

Let me correct you:
[An ancient Chinese nation was defeated by Mongolian]
[Mongolians Chinese ruled over Han Chinese]
Mongolians Chinese are Inner Mongolian, they were/ are Chinese without a doubt.

Mongolian, Han and other Chinese ethnics established the Republic (Modern China) together,
according to this fact, those ancient nations established by these founders (Chinese) are certainly belong to Chinese history.
 
Let me correct you:
[An ancient Chinese nation was defeated by Mongolian]
[Mongolians Chinese ruled over Han Chinese]
Mongolians Chinese are Inner Mongolian, they were/ are Chinese without a doubt.

I understand what you are trying to explain.

What you say would be true if today no longer Mongolia country, instead it was annexed into China.

However, today still Mongolia country as you know.
That country defeated Han Chinese and ruled over Han Chinese. Then a part of them stayed the land they ruled, the land now named China.

Fortunately for the Han Chinese, quantity of Mongolians very little (but they fight better than Han Chinese so much), Otherwise, today we will see a different story on the land we're talking about.
 
I understand what you are trying to explain.

What you say would be true if today no longer Mongolia country, instead it was annexed into China.

However, today still Mongolia country as you know.
That country defeated Han Chinese and ruled over Han Chinese. Then a part of them stayed the land they ruled, the land now named China.

Fortunately for the Han Chinese, quantity of Mongolians very little (but they fight better than Han Chinese so much), Otherwise, today we will see a different story on the land we're talking about.

As I have mentioned above:
1. More than half of Mongolian around the world are Chinese;
2. The cradle of Mongolian is in China;
3. The direct posterity of the Great Khan (Golden Family) are all Chinese;
4. Mongolian were one of the founders of the Republic.
5. the main ethnic of Modern Mongolia, Khalkha, were not even belong to the Mongolian family during the Yuan Dynasty.

That country you say, Modern Mongol, was divided from Modern China, it never ever ruled Chinese. How could they ever on behalf of the posterity of their master, Golden Family (Chinese). Who gave them the right to on behalf of the half percent of Mongolian (Chinese) in the world.


Also there is a country called Macedonia nowadays, do you think that Greece people will be please to let this "Modern Macedonia" claims their history of Ancient Macedonia?
 
As I have mentioned above:
1. More than half of Mongolian around the world are Chinese;
2. The cradle of Mongolian is in China;
3. The direct posterity of the Great Khan (Golden Family) are all Chinese;
4. Mongolian were one of the founders of the Republic.
5. the main ethnic of Modern Mongolia, Khalkha, were not even belong to the Mongolian family during the Yuan Dynasty.

That country you say, Modern Mongol, was divided from Modern China, it never ever ruled Chinese. How could they ever on behalf of the posterity of their master, Golden Family (Chinese). Who gave them the right to on behalf of the half percent of Mongolian (Chinese) in the world.


Also there is a country called Macedonia nowadays, do you think that Greece people will be please to let this "Modern Macedonia" claims their history of Ancient Macedonia?

I said very clearly in # 142.You can read it again.

Now, I invite you to view the Mongol Empire map:

mongolmap.jpg
 
You can also take a look at the map of Macedonia empire.
Obviously you never read #143.

You are idiot when you are talking about Mancedonia here in referring to China. Macedonia was part of country called Yugoslavia in the last century. When Yugoslavia collapsed, it became independence state. It mean: China will collapese then Tibet, East Turkistant (Xinjiang), Inner Mongolia, Manchuria, NanYue will become independence states.:tup:
 
You are idiot when you are talking about Mancedonia here in referring to China. Macedonia was part of country called Yugoslavia in the last century. When Yugoslavia collapsed, it became independence state. It mean: China will collapese then Tibet, East Turkistant (Xinjiang), Inner Mongolia, Manchuria, NanYue will become independence states.:tup:[/

You Vietnamese alway dream that day come...but wake up with nightmare to realize that next day you will return back to be China's vessal state once again...remember you will never escapre China's gravity, unless you move Vietname far far away from China otherwise we will keep owning you in the future...

We chinese has a very good long term strategic vision: when we get NanYue, we control the red river...your pain in our hand as how we get Tibet and we control Brahmaputra river...and India is crying for the pain to get water treaty settle with us
 
You Vietnamese alway dream that day come...but wake up with nightmare to realize that next day you will return back to be China's vessal state once again...remember you will never escapre China's gravity, unless you move Vietname far far away from China otherwise we will keep owning you in the future...

We chinese has a very good long term strategic vision: when we get NanYue, we control the red river...your pain in our hand as how we get Tibet and we control Brahmaputra river...and India is crying for the pain to get water treaty settle with us

China's was vessel state of Russia and USA in cold war, it was long term strategic vision of idiot extremists in China.:P
 
China's was vessel state of Russia and USA in cold war, it was long term strategic vision of idiot extremists in China.:P

Hahaha atleast we dont have to beg for loan to buy weapons for our country, and our boundery is expanding all the time , our economy is second biggest in the world , we had $3trillions in fx reserves,we colonised pathetic useless disgusting thief country called vietnam for thousands of year:rofl:

That doesn't deny that a country now named "china" which was defeated by the Mongols; and Mongolians ruled over the Han Chinese on a land they named "Yuan Dynasty" (China today).

That can't be changed with any perspective.

LOL man you are really dumb the point of invading another country is to gain territory, how the heck the mongol defeated us where half of mongolia is now belong to china hahaha
 
Back
Top Bottom