PeaceGen
BANNED
- Joined
- Jun 2, 2012
- Messages
- 3,889
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
- Location
Saddam and his comrades made themselves into a constant threat to the region and the stability of the world-economy, the Iraqi people suffered because of this.
So yeah, while he was a teamplayer on the global stage, we supported Saddam,
and when he became a threat to the global stage (upsetting the petro dollar global arrangement *was* that, and still is to a large extent, much like the OPEC threat of the 1970s was real and severe),
especially when he chose to ignore sanctions and let his people starve,
we had no choice but to remove him.
Libya : same thing. re-introducing a gold-based economy? just not tolerable in today's world.
Gaddafi wanted to seem like the big strong dude standing up to the US, and he got zapped for it. By the people he held down in much the same way Saddam dealt with political ambitions of countrymen that weren't 'yes-men' (people who never ever criticize the leader of the country); violently.
And there are other things in the world that we in the West can not and will not tolerate, a nuclear-armed Iran and/or North-Korea, for instance. Give in too much, especially to some "need for military balance", and you end up in war. Because what is the reason to go to war? Fear and hate. *BOTH* being the driving forces for nuclear weapons ambitions of nations like Iran and North-Korea, and also for stupid moves that upset the world-economy (which is just as bad as rolling lots of tanks into another country), thinking the real motives will stay hidden if they are masked by lies and half-truths.
And this is all far from stupid logic, people.
If you can't see that, then you're lying or just not very smart yourselves.
And for those who truly don't understand yet how to stand up to the white man effectively,
i'm most willing to explain it.
it boils down to this : patient decades long negotiations and public discussions (more than satire or sarcasm - that's warmongering), *instead* of centuries-long wars. we've been through this before you know.. too many people died and suffered in the first Crusades.
and i'm not kidding this war on terror has the potential to become the age of the 2nd Crusades.
except this time it won't be armies moving back and forth over continents, it'll be more chaotic due to the infrastructure of roads and airtraffic now available.
but it could certainly go on for centuries, this war of terror,
making it the 2nd Crusades age.
instead of an age known for technological achievements.
one side has to be vastly stronger than the other side, and the stronger side should respect the "weaker" side. i say "weaker" because you'd only be weaker in military terms, by your own choice hopefully, and never be addressed as weaker in other aspects of life.
in practical terms : you fight with video cameras *instead* of with weapons (*NOT* both!).
please feel free to ask me specific questions on this topic.
or stay stuck in your hatred and suffering and bad Karma.
your choice.
now it's an informed choice too. sorry about that, you left me no other option, dear Muslims.
{meanwhile}
the Afghan Taliban is getting plenty of western media attention according to my RSS news feed.
i built that web-app myself, and while it is of use to everyone here, releasing the address to it reveals my real full name, my picture, and which city i live in. i'm not comfy with that. plus advertising one's own products goes against forum rules, so i could do it perhaps one time at most.
but to be the only one with access to this tool, which is only going to get more useful as more news sources are added (i host everything from CNN to Fox News to Russia's RT, to ArabNews and AlJazeera, etc, etc),
is not exactly fair to the debaters on this forum either.
so here goes (please don't kill me, i'm useful) : http://seductiveapps.com/news - all the headlines passing by in near real-time.
it may take a while to load the first time in other parts of the world than Europe, but it's well worth the 14-megabyte download and first-time wait of up to a minute at most. After that you can browse to specific categories in the News sub-menu at the top of the page.
it also runs on tablets and smartphones sold as new in the last 2 or 3 years at least.
Category : English News/World Headlines.
Local : 2018-03-05(Monday) 06:14:57
Remote : Mon, 5 Mar 2018 05:14:57 GMT
So yeah, while he was a teamplayer on the global stage, we supported Saddam,
and when he became a threat to the global stage (upsetting the petro dollar global arrangement *was* that, and still is to a large extent, much like the OPEC threat of the 1970s was real and severe),
especially when he chose to ignore sanctions and let his people starve,
we had no choice but to remove him.
Libya : same thing. re-introducing a gold-based economy? just not tolerable in today's world.
Gaddafi wanted to seem like the big strong dude standing up to the US, and he got zapped for it. By the people he held down in much the same way Saddam dealt with political ambitions of countrymen that weren't 'yes-men' (people who never ever criticize the leader of the country); violently.
And there are other things in the world that we in the West can not and will not tolerate, a nuclear-armed Iran and/or North-Korea, for instance. Give in too much, especially to some "need for military balance", and you end up in war. Because what is the reason to go to war? Fear and hate. *BOTH* being the driving forces for nuclear weapons ambitions of nations like Iran and North-Korea, and also for stupid moves that upset the world-economy (which is just as bad as rolling lots of tanks into another country), thinking the real motives will stay hidden if they are masked by lies and half-truths.
And this is all far from stupid logic, people.
If you can't see that, then you're lying or just not very smart yourselves.
And for those who truly don't understand yet how to stand up to the white man effectively,
i'm most willing to explain it.
it boils down to this : patient decades long negotiations and public discussions (more than satire or sarcasm - that's warmongering), *instead* of centuries-long wars. we've been through this before you know.. too many people died and suffered in the first Crusades.
and i'm not kidding this war on terror has the potential to become the age of the 2nd Crusades.
except this time it won't be armies moving back and forth over continents, it'll be more chaotic due to the infrastructure of roads and airtraffic now available.
but it could certainly go on for centuries, this war of terror,
making it the 2nd Crusades age.
instead of an age known for technological achievements.
one side has to be vastly stronger than the other side, and the stronger side should respect the "weaker" side. i say "weaker" because you'd only be weaker in military terms, by your own choice hopefully, and never be addressed as weaker in other aspects of life.
in practical terms : you fight with video cameras *instead* of with weapons (*NOT* both!).
please feel free to ask me specific questions on this topic.
or stay stuck in your hatred and suffering and bad Karma.
your choice.
now it's an informed choice too. sorry about that, you left me no other option, dear Muslims.
{meanwhile}
the Afghan Taliban is getting plenty of western media attention according to my RSS news feed.
i built that web-app myself, and while it is of use to everyone here, releasing the address to it reveals my real full name, my picture, and which city i live in. i'm not comfy with that. plus advertising one's own products goes against forum rules, so i could do it perhaps one time at most.
but to be the only one with access to this tool, which is only going to get more useful as more news sources are added (i host everything from CNN to Fox News to Russia's RT, to ArabNews and AlJazeera, etc, etc),
is not exactly fair to the debaters on this forum either.
so here goes (please don't kill me, i'm useful) : http://seductiveapps.com/news - all the headlines passing by in near real-time.
it may take a while to load the first time in other parts of the world than Europe, but it's well worth the 14-megabyte download and first-time wait of up to a minute at most. After that you can browse to specific categories in the News sub-menu at the top of the page.
it also runs on tablets and smartphones sold as new in the last 2 or 3 years at least.
- News Analysis: Will government's dialogue offer to Taliban bring peace to Afghanistan? Xinhua
- US, Afghan leaders agree on peace push, Taliban doesn't Newser
- Once-Feared Afghan Warlord Is Still Causing Trouble, but Talking Peace New York Times
Full coverage
Category : English News/World Headlines.
Local : 2018-03-05(Monday) 06:14:57
Remote : Mon, 5 Mar 2018 05:14:57 GMT